The Earth, Air, Sea, Sculptures Return! - So Happy!

A few weeks ago a mural was starting at the Water Dept Pump Station on the corner of Sloat and Great Highway, a few steps west of the Zoo.  As a fan of murals,  I'd fantasized about one in that location since the start of when that huge slab of concrete went up.  I thought it would have been a nice opportunity for the Water Dept and Zoo to collaborate on a design.  Something colorful and nature related.  My vision was the ocean side with Sea Birds, Plovers to Pelicans, and the Sloat side, with Zoo Birds, Otriches to Penguins, big to small heading towards the Zoo.  It was a letdown to see a drab colored mural forming, and it wasn't until it was near done that you could tell what it was.  A collage of Calla Lilies.  

This past week, I spied something peeking out from behind the fencing in that location, that brought a huge smile.  The return of the Earth, Air, Sea Sculptures!, that once sat on that corner's spot. 

I'd have to long search for my own old pix, so I grabbed this from sfpuc.org (Westside Pump Station Project PDF).

When the construction of this project started and the Sculptures were removed, I wrote a bit about it in a post.

I was worried they had been trashed, so I contacted the Construction Company to find out their fate.  I was happy to learn the plan was for them to be replaced.  Had I not been told that, I would have suggested the Zoo take possession and display them.  In fact, in recent time, as the construction was concluding at the corner, I began to wonder about the Sculptures again, and had it on my to-do list to revisit their status.  Glad it resolved itself, and the plan didn't change in the three years since.

I am so happy to see these iconic pieces back home.  I don't even care about the lackluster mural anymore.  In fact, I think anything more would have distracted from these treasured gems.  

I love they are being showcased, but I would have liked to see them displayed more like they were before.  I think the positioning of the three pieces being together and turned towards eachother, showed them as a cohesive group.  I also like them on a bed of flowers.  Maybe that will be added.  All references are shown in the flashback photo at the top.

Without being able to get closer, it looks like theres a divider between the Lion and the Bird, which bothers me.  Again lends to me liking them more together as a group.  I also wish the Fish was turned slightly more toward center.  Those asthetic issues aside, I get pure joy seeing them again.  I only hope vandals show them respect.

Nice that the Lion's eye was restored.

History on the Earth, Air, Sea Sculptures ... Commissioned by the San Francisco Arts Commission for the San Francisco Clean Water Program.

I viewed this site before, but for some reason I couldn't get photos to load this time.  This is a screencap. 

artandarchitecture-sf.com/earth-air-sea

A bit about the artist.  At the bottom there is a list of her other works, which would be cool to seek out.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Fuller_(sculptor)

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Blogger's Statement

"Personal Opinions and Facts presented publicly are Not against the law or any rules. ... Censorship and Retaliation Actions in an attempt at Suppression are frowned upon by Healthy Societies."

For Full Statement see this post:

https://iamnotananteater.blogspot.com/2018/09/my-zoo-status.html

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

No Peace for Me - New Chronicle Article Just Dropped

So yea, just finished my last post and saw this.  I literally said outloud, "These F'ers Just Won't Let Me Have Any Peace"!

I ain't going to do a separate reaction post, I'm just going to insert my comments into this, because I don't expect there to be that much new to add.

Here is the full text.  You can view the article online here: 

https://www.sfchronicle.com/sf/article/panda-san-francisco-zoo-19524414.php

Bringing giant pandas to the San Francisco Zoo from China could cost as much as $70 million over 10 years, according to Jeff Pace, the zoo’s chief financial officer, who spoke at a zoo advisory board meeting on Thursday. 

This spring, Mayor London Breed secured an agreement to receive a pair of pandas from China. They could arrive next year. Breed and zoo officials tout them as an economic rainmaker for San Francisco, but a ballpark estimate of the total cost to keep and care for the pandas – which Breed said will be at least partly covered by private donations – has not been revealed until now.  

😮 "At least partly?"

Pace addressed the cost of hosting pandas during a meeting of the Joint Zoo Committee, composed of zoo representatives and members of the Recreation and Park Commission, the Commission of Animal Control and Welfare, and the San Francisco Zoological Society board, which runs the zoo. 

At the meeting, members of the animal rights nonprofit In Defense of Animals voiced opposition to the city’s plans to bring a pair of pandas from China to the zoo next year, citing concerns about lapses in worker safety and animal welfare cited by 20 current and former zoo employees in a recent Chronicle report. 

Fleur Dawes, director of communications with the group, said that $70 million was a “low estimate” for keeping the pandas over a decade, the typical time that pandas are loaned from China.

In response, Pace said, “$70 million is in the range of what it would cost to house pandas for ten years, but I think it's high.”

By comparison, the zoo’s total expenses were $24.7 million in the fiscal year ending in June 2023, according to its most recently available tax documents.

Just housing the bears could cost $25 million, the zoo estimates. But there is also food – thousands of pounds of bamboo per month – and veterinary care for the animals, in addition to the cost to rent the pandas from China, which is traditionally $1 million per year.

Vitus Leung, the zoo’s deputy director, said it’s premature to provide a definitive total cost estimate for the pandas. 

“While our CFO, Jeff Pace, agreed with the speaker about the ranges proposed by other zoos, it also is worth noting that the San Diego Zoo and Smithsonian National Zoo (in Washington, D.C.) sought the return of pandas after hosting them for many years, providing strong evidence that these zoos have financially benefited from having pandas,” he wrote in an email. “We remain confident that the arrival of the pandas at the S.F. Zoo and Gardens will have significant positive impact on attendance, enthusiasm and cultural significance.”

"Blah, blah, on significant impact.  They need to take on my suggestion that the Zoo only commit to hosting two years (temporarily).  Evaluating how significant the impact and additional revenue continue before hosting permanently, and building that pricey enclosure."

The mayor’s office also said it was too soon to comment on the total cost of pandas. 

“We're just not there yet, but throughout this process the city will continue to be transparent about this budget, financial details and plans as they are finalized,” said Parisa Safarzadeh, Breed’s press secretary.

The zoo and the city intend to fundraise for the pandas.

"What?!  Now the Zoo is going to fundraise for Pandas?  That was not part of the Mayor's original Plan.  All costs were on the City.  If the Zoo can raise money for Pandas, it can and needs to raise money for Orangutans.  If this is accurate, this is bullshit!!"

This month, the Board of Supervisors passed legislation from Breed that will allow certain city officials to solicit private donations for the pandas as well as other capital improvements at the zoo. Among those that officials plan to ask for donations are a host of major corporations such as United Airlines, Doordash and Salesforce. Some of those potential donors have contracts with the city.

The legislation initially would have only allowed officials to ask for donations to fund the panda program, but was expanded to benefit the zoo’s other projects after supervisors raised concerns about the conditions at the zoo outlined by the Chronicle.

"If the Zoo is now involved with fundraising for Pandas, the information here is confusing and conflicting.  Additionally, after the Board of Supervisors voted to allow the Mayor to move forward, I sent a list of detailed questions regarding the amount and use of the funds to both the Mayor and Supervisor Preston.  I have received no response."

Breed has frequently cited potentials for increased business and tourism as benefits of bringing in pandas. At other zoos with panda programs, attendance typically increases initially and then drops off, according to Nissei Asia and other news outlets. 

"Again, temporary hosting initially. Price tag reduced.  Funds raised fix the Zoo."

Larry Mazzola, the Joint Zoo Committee chair who is a member of the Recreation and Park Commission, said Thursday that he had invited zoo executive director and CEO Tanya Peterson to the meeting to discuss challenges at the zoo raised by the Chronicle. However, he said, an attorney advised Peterson not to attend because of an ongoing investigation being conducted by the zoo’s board after publication of the Chronicle’s report and after 97% of the zoo’s union members cast a vote of no-confidence in Peterson in April. 

“These accusations (contained in the Chronicle report) bother me, as a labor rep,” said Mazzola, who is also a business manager with United Association of Plumbers and Pipefitters Local 38. “I care deeply about how the workers are being treated, (at) what level they are being heard. And if they're not being heard that's a major problem. I intend to follow up on this.”

"Again, blah, blah, been two months.  What's the follow-up?  How long is the investigation going to take?  There is clear evidence of mismanagement by Director Peterson, neglect of management oversight by the Zoological Society, and frankly by the Rec and Park Commission.  This is an easy fix.  Replace Peterson, and get the Board and Park Commissioners to do their jobs as outlined in the Lease agreement."

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Blogger's Statement

"Personal Opinions and Facts presented publicly are Not against the law or any rules. ... Censorship and Retaliation Actions in an attempt at Suppression are frowned upon by Healthy Societies."

For Full Statement see this post:

https://iamnotananteater.blogspot.com/2018/09/my-zoo-status.html

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

If The Zoo Builds New For Pandas, They Must First Build New For Orangutans!

I ended my last post with this paragraph:

If the City of San Francisco, Mayor Breed, the San Francisco Zoological Society, Board Chair Melinda Dunn and Director Tanya Peterson, are all in on the Panda Plan, they need to build the Orangutans a new home on the site of Triple Grotto.  They should not be allowed to build a new enclosure for Animals who do not live at the Zoo, when Animals who do have been neglected.  The Mayor is fundraising for Pandas, the Zoological Society needs to pony up funds for the Orangutans.  Director Peterson and the Society wanted Orangutans, and did nothing to house them appropriately from day one, five years ago.  

There's alot of money in the Society, specifically the Board, and Peterson who is paid more than the Mayor and barely works.  Peterson and each Board Member need to write a check to the Orangutans.

It is no ones fault but Director Peterson's that there are apparently no funds for Zoo Needs.  The lack of fundraising by her is well-known, which is curious as before she was inserted into position as Director, she has been reported as a fundraising leader for the Zoological Society.  So, Why has she seemingly not done any fundraising since becoming Director?  And if she says she has, where is all the money?  There should then be sixteen years of money, that should have been going to upkeep and upgrade to the Zoo.  As someone who has closely watched over as much as I can, the only fundraising I see is the annual ZooFest specifically geared toward the deep pockets of Society Board and Members.  Which I will add never had helping the Chimpanzees or Orangutans as a theme any year respective to their needs. I have been keeping a notebook of fundraising ideas for over a decade, where are Peterson's?  During the Covid shutdowns, while Zoos all over were doing everything they could to keep funds coming in, in lieu of no gate sales, SFZoo did nothing, except ask for donations on social media, one time.  And Keepers, who's hours were cut, donated, while upper management took no pay cuts.  Either Peterson is void of creating ideas to raise funds, is lazy, just doesn't care, sees no value in the dollars of the little people, or in my opinion, all of the above.  If she did she would have started creating a caring and endeared Community when I suggested it directly to her in 2009.  So, she has no business to cry poor when Needs arise, because the lack of funds to provide and fix are solely on her.  

Also, Where is the $250,000 that was locked for Squirrel Monkeys, but never used for them?  

Oh and I won't rehash the funds continuously spent on Gardens and Art Installations.  

That new Canopy BS across from Orangutans, should be suspended immediately. It is not too far progressed to halt it. Increased revenue in the future from Pandas should go to recreate Bird string in this location.  I've heard space for Birds that have needed to be off exhibit for various reasons, including waves of Avian Flu, is tight and needed.

And it was so important to spend funds, reported to be $15,000, on yet another water station.  I don't even remember this thing ever working.

Additionally, this has been a wonder since a former employee spoke with me about it many years ago.... Why hasn't the Zoological Society ever renegotiated the annual Management Fee the City pays the Zoo?  It was set at $4 million a year in 1993, pretty sure there should have been some cost of living increases in the last thirty years?  Guess no one has been paying attention.  No surprise there.

So yeah, Director Peterson, and the Zoological Society Chair and Members, and even the City, for some back pay in what should have been fee increases, need to get out their checkbooks.  The kitty for Orangutans is still at empty. 

Time will tell whether the San Francisco Zoological Society will fulfill their moral obligation to the Orangutans, or if they will choose to continue to let them live in an inappropriate and ancient "habitat", while they build the "best habitat" for Pandas.  ... And Director Peterson, et al, better not even think of kicking the Orangutans out, like she tried to do to the Chimpanzees, rather than give them the home they deserve.  Dig deep people we are all watching.

Their decision will speak volumes to how much they actually care, and to the validity of accusations made, regardless of the slick statements they make.  As the saying goes, ACTIONS speak louder than words.  

Related post:

iamnotananteater.blogspot.com/2024/05/new-home-for-orangutans-heres-plan.html

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Blogger's Statement

"Personal Opinions and Facts presented publicly are Not against the law or any rules. ... Censorship and Retaliation Actions in an attempt at Suppression are frowned upon by Healthy Societies."

For Full Statement see this post:

https://iamnotananteater.blogspot.com/2018/09/my-zoo-status.html

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Don't Be Fooled, These People Are Dangerous!

So, I didn't plan to react to these Activists again, even after listening to their words at the Rec and Park Commission Meeting Thursday.  Then their display outside City Hall after the Meeting got media attention, and I saw this photo late yesterday in a KRON4 News article.

I haven't talked with many, so there might be more, but there have been a couple people I know, who think/thought these people would help in the effort to highlight why San Francisco Zoo Director Tanya Peterson needs to be replaced.  They are not helping.  Since most of their words are taken from previous News articles, some phrasing is accurate, but in my opinion their presentation of words is skewed and sensationalized.  

While I too believe that the Animals who have lost their lives, "did not have to", as Dawes quotes in her comments to the Commission, the tabloid way they going about presenting issues, really rubs me the wrong way.  Have they written or talked about each one of those Animals, what happened to them, why they lost their lives and why they think, they didn't have to?  My guess is that's a No on all points.  Holding signs like this, under a banner that uses the word "Abusing", is creating a slanted and abbreviated narrative, that only serves to further their agenda, not help the Zoo.  

Additionally, including signs about what happened to Pandas in Memphis, only shows they are riding the wave of San Francisco's Panda Plan to further their personal agenda.  None of these people have been present or vocal til now.  They do not care about the Zoo, the Animals or seeking to bring about changes that better the situation.  If they did, they would have been present since their last outburst in 2008. 

As I predicted from the first time they reared their heads, their agenda and their goal, is to get the Zoo shut down.  In my last post, I showed a quote by In Defense Of Animals, most likely local mouth piece Fleur Dawes, that states exactly that.  IDA is known for being Close Zoo Zealots, and they will (obviously) do and say anything to further their agenda. 

I have read through Justin Barker's SFZoo Watch, and while some bullet point suggestions in reference to change needed at Our Zoo, slightly echo my own, aligning himself with Fleur Dawes from In Defense Of Animals, and makes him part of her agenda.  Additionally, again as I predicted from day one, he does not go to the Zoo, and admitted that during his in person comments at the Commission meeting.

The Meeting archive video can be viewed at this link:

https://sanfrancisco.granicus.com/player/clip/46409?view_id=91&redirect=true

Hit start button first, then Item #6 San Francisco Zoo ... first is presentation by Zoo Staffer, then public comments start at 45:10 minutes in.

I have a really hard time with people who come out and spew fiery words, without taking the time to be at the Zoo, see things for themselves and talk to Staff themselves.  Pulling words and quotes from other sources is just not a valid approach in my opinion.  

In Fleur Dawes comments in front of the Commission, she mentioned a Bird "who plucks it's feathers from stress".  Did she go to the Zoo and see the Bird for herself?  Did she seek out an Animal Staffer and ask about the Birds history and condition?  Once again, I predict a definite no to the later.  I know this Bird and have spent time viewing him and his companion.  This past Monday, he sat at the fence with me for an extended time, eating while I talked to him.  He was not visibly stressed in any way.  That said, I have only seen him in this exhibit for a few weeks and haven't had a chance to learn more about him and his companion.

As I noted in my last post, I kept myself from posting about Zoo stuff for near two weeks.  I've been very at peace with that.  With my sweet visit with the Bird mentioned above and other Zoo Friends, it was a good Zoo week.  All I had planned for the weekend was to write a post about a development that made me happy. 

I've been saying, I'm done for some time, mostly for my health, but also for my own personal productivity, and honestly, there is not much more I can say, that haven't said in 900+ posts over the past thirteen years.  And, like I said, I wasn't even going to do this one, as after watching these two speak at Thursday's Meeting, I was so upset, ears pulsating, into the next morning.  I finally had to take anxiety medication when I woke up yesterday.

I truly don't know how to continue being so deeply affected by Zoo stuff.  It's been so many years that I have.  The Zoo has been a part of all my sixty years, but the level of involvement has been constant and passionate, since 5:30pm December 25, 2007, when I came home from my Christmas outtings, which included visiting the Zoo, and turned on the News.  I supported the Zoo through that tragedy, and my support has continued.  Only difference is, now I know too much, and my focus of support is solely on the Animals, and not the Zoo as a whole.  By that I mean, I do not support the way the Zoo is run or the management structure.  I support and advocate for a better Zoo, that will thrive into the future, operating at it's potential, soley FOR the optimum life experience of the Animals that call the Zoo home.

As I continue to navigate all things Zoo, and the upset it causes me, I will of course be vocal as new things arise, and probably even as the same bullshit continues, because I can't seem to help myself.

With all my efforts through the years, I was driven to document all the wrongs and fails, since no one else was being a Voice for the Animals.  I felt it was up to me, and if I didn't, I was letting the Animals down.  With all my words, suggestions, ideas, and solo championing, I felt it was up to me to save the Zoo.  At least, I made a difference in the lives of our three senior Chimpanzees.  And with that, I will close by saying, I will never give up trying to do the same for our Orangutans.  

If the City of San Francisco, Mayor Breed, the San Francisco Zoological Society, Board Chair Melinda Dunn and Director Tanya Peterson, are all in on the Panda Plan, they need to build the Orangutans a new home on the site of Triple Grotto.  They should not be allowed to build a new enclosure for Animals who do not live at the Zoo, when Animals who do have been neglected.  They can make all the statements they want that boast their accreditation, and no blame, but they know, Director Peterson knows, the disservice, disrespect and moral crime she perpetrated upon the Orangutans.  I saw it with my own eyes and so did everyone else.  Not one member of the Animal Care Staff, or myself, believe the illusion she has sold to others.  The proof is not only right there in the "habitat" they are languishing in, but clearly documented in my countless blog posts, photos and videos.  The Mayor is fundraising for Pandas, the Zoological Society needs to pony up funds for the Orangutans.  Director Peterson and the Society wanted Orangutans, and did nothing to house them appropriately from day one, five years ago.  There's alot of money in the Society, specifically the Board, and Peterson who is paid more than the Mayor and barely works.  Peterson and each Board Member need to write a check to the Orangutans.

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Blogger's Statement

"Personal Opinions and Facts presented publicly are Not against the law or any rules. ... Censorship and Retaliation Actions in an attempt at Suppression are frowned upon by Healthy Societies."

For Full Statement see this post:

https://iamnotananteater.blogspot.com/2018/09/my-zoo-status.html

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

I Called It! ... SFZoo Activist Says, "All Zoos Need To Close"

In my last post, I referred to Fleur Dawes and Justin Barker, as "Close Zoo Zealots", a term I made up years ago, as I constantly read ignorant words from anti-Zoo people.  As I predicted, these types, are dangerous for our San Francisco Zoo.

Barker and Dawes have hitched their personal agenda to the Panda Plan, using information seemingly mostly taken from the Chronicle articles published in April, and now random Panda " facts".  I doubt either of them have even been to the Zoo but maybe once in recent times, if that.  They don't need to for what they are trying to accomplish, which is clear in the title of this post.

Last weekend, I almost wrote another post about the Activists, after hearing both interviewed on news reports following the Board of Supervisors vote to allow the Mayor to proceed with her Panda fundraising plan.  I was so bothered by their words, that I wanted to express that, but ended up, staying on course with as I noted previously, by not blogging in the same way as I have been for the last thirteen years.  It was hard, because I really feel like their words are irresponsible and dangerous to Our SFZoo.  

Once again, not long before midnight, I decided to check Zoo mentions on Twitter, something I don't do daily.  There was Dawes again, spewing irresponsible words, in a video posted to the In Defense of Animals Twitter.  I had to respond...

view video here:

https://x.com/IDAUSA/status/1802823535506694172

There was another video of her, this time on KRON4 News.  Not only am I offended by her words, I find it offensive that News Media (KRON has not been the only one), gives airtime to Activists who don't even frequent the Zoo.  There seems to be no vetting before airing them. The Zoo has problems, but these Activists focus is misguided.  

Still, I was holding out for not writing a blog post, but once I read the few post replies under KRON's tweet, I could no longer let my tweet replies be all I said.  So, here I am, nearing 2a, ears pulsating, and Zoo blogging.

I called it, when I said these Activists are "Close Zoo Zealots".  Their agenda is clearly confirmed by IDA's own words (I assume by Fleur Dawes) in one of those Tweet replies...

This post has highlighted the words of Fleur Dawes, who is the local mouth piece for In Defense of Animals.  I do call-out "Activists", as Justin Barker has not only spoken, but also is heading an effort called SFZoo Watch.  I had previously seen on that site some indication that they had seemingly joined forces, but at this now almost 3a glance, I couldn't find it.  To my knowledge, Barker has not indicated a flat-out close zoo agenda, but is putting forth closing the Zoo as we know it and having it become a rescue only facility.  I personally don't see how a change like that fixes the current issues.  That said, any alignment between the two, considering IDA's following of the equally un-knowledgeable, their words could pose a threat.  

Their words and agenda, are not only dangerous to Our Zoo, but dangerous to Our Animals.  I know there are army's of people who want Zoo's closed, I've gone into verbal battle with them before.  I will not budge on my opinion, which is creating a movement to close an Animal Care Facility such as a Zoo is something that makes no logical sense, unless as a last resort.  San Francisco Zoo is not beyond fixing.  

Anyone who says, "...all zoos need to close and animals should be sent to sanctuary", is ignorant to the reality of such a statement.  First, there is an average of 2000 Animals in the average Zoo collection.  There is reportedly around 500 Zoo's (Including Aquariums) in North America, even if that number was lower, there are some with larger collections.  So, let's put the amount of Animals who would need "sanctuary", according to In Defense of Animals agenda, at one million. Each of those Animals, has housing, food and medical care.  

Now let's look at Sanctuaries.  I personally have experience with Sanctuaries, as I have been involved with trying to find Sanctuary homes for Animals I know who were in need of rescuing.  Anyone who actually cares about the well-being of Animals,  no doubt follows at least a few Sanctuaries on social media.  Those who do, know that Sanctuaries are constantly struggling to raise funds for the Animals in their care.  They have to constantly turn away Animals in Need because they don't have the funds and/or the space.  There is just not enough money and/or space to place every Zoo Animal in a Sanctuary.  That is the reality.  There are so many Animals in Need, as I'm writing this, all you need to do is look at a Facebook Group called CA/PNW Farmed Animals Needing Adoption (FANA) and see all the sadness.  So many Animals that have no homes and no medical care.  Those are the Animals in Need.  Not Zoo Animals who are already being cared for.

Of course there will be Zoo's and other Animal Facilities that are beyond fixing, and need the intervention.  Again, I do not believe San Francisco Zoo is there yet.  SFZoo needs a new Director, and a few others at the Zoo gone.  SFZoo needs the Zoological Society Board and the SF Rec and Park, to take their oversight duties seriously.  The whole management structure needs an overhaul.  The City (Rec and Park), and the Board, who have neglected their duty to the Zoo for at least the sixteen years I've been watching, need to come up with the funds to fix Needs.  Put these things in place, and Our Zoo can thrive.   That's what those who care should be focused on.  Not creating narrative that can hurt the Zoo and the Animals that call it home.

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Blogger's Statement

"Personal Opinions and Facts presented publicly are Not against the law or any rules. ... Censorship and Retaliation Actions in an attempt at Suppression are frowned upon by Healthy Societies."

For Full Statement see this post:

https://iamnotananteater.blogspot.com/2018/09/my-zoo-status.html

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

So Called "SFZoo Activists" - How Often Do They Visit Our Zoo?

Well, I guess being as invested in the Zoo as I am, and for as long as I have, letting go even a bit, is going to be a tough task in the current climate our Zoo is in. 

I was set-off this morning when this Tweet came up in my feed...

Before even clicking to expand the content, which includes a petition of sorts, I was quickly thumb typing a reply to In Defense of Animals, but ran out of characters, prompting this post.

We all know, I'm the first person to be critical of the San Francisco Zoo.  That said, when I am, I make sure to know what I'm talking about.  I write about issues that I've seen with my own eyes.  I do my own information seeking outreach, research, and investigation.  I don't speak out about something I've just heard about, unless I can confirm it on my own.

When the Zoo was in the news again on Thursday,  one of the articles contained quotes from Fleur Dawes, a representative for the local chapter of In Defense of Animals.  I do not claim to know everything about IDA, but I have checked them out a bit on two occasions.  My first experience of them was at least a dozen years ago.  I had started attending the Joint Zoo Committee Meetings, and I remember one of their people standing up and making a statement about our Lions, that contained errors.  I was bothered that someone would insert themselves into a proceeding, acting like they knew something, and then getting facts wrong.  These were not people who knew anything about our Zoo or the Animals that lived there.  They were clearly not people who have been to the Zoo and took the time to even learn about the Animals they were referring to.

The next time was this week.  My scan through their Social Media showed that they seem to have not posted anything in recent times other than this past week, or have seemingly said anything in reference to the San Francisco Zoo publicly since 2008, yet they are publicly speaking like they have been active activists for our Zoo non-stop.  So both times, it was obvious to me that the representatives speaking out against our Zoo, clearly know nothing about our Zoo, that they didn't glean from news reports, maybe even this blog. 

I'm all for constructive awareness for the issues that plague our Zoo, but not for sensationalism, which is how I think that Tweet reads.

While over twenty years ago, In Defense of Animals seemed to be a force in helping gain awareness for the Zoo's Elephants to be rehomed, and were active in trying to get the Zoo turned into a rescue only facility in 2008, they have seemingly been silent.  I don't think people coming out of the woodwork, on the occasion when the Zoo gets media attention, is constructive to helping the issues that brew at our Zoo every day. 

Where were these people when the Orangutans were living in caged tubes?   No where.  If they wanted to be outraged about something as it was happening, that would have been it.  But, they obviously don't come to the Zoo.  I'm sorry if this is judgemental, but as someone who has been deeply invested in everything that goes on at our Zoo, consistently for sixteen years, and to the point of physical distress, I'm offended by their intermittent outbursts and part-time activism for our Zoo.

I'm not trying to throw the efforts of others under the bus, but geez I've been standing alone, yelling from the mountain top, for over a decade, help would have been welcomed.  I'm just saying how random appearances on the Zoo issue band-wagon, make me feel.  If there are others who want to help the Zoo with change, be present more often, because as I see it, or rather hear it now, your voices are just echos.

The issues presented on their Socials for situations nationally seem valid, and hopefully doing some good, but their involvement in the current Zoo situation, is bothersome to me.  They are noting long lists of stuff, that include incidents that date back seventeen years, as well as lumping in references from other Zoos.  While the older incidents, such as the Tiger tragedy, are valid issues, for the specific situation of bringing Pandas to San Francisco, I think it's off course and doesn't lend to the real reasons, in my opinion, of why now is not the time for our Zoo to host Pandas.

Yes, there have been horrific avoidable deaths, including the most recent one, involving the young Penguin. I will never diminish those tragedies, or forget how they could have been avoided.  While I can not predict every situation, I highly doubt Pandas are going to die here.  I think saying such a thing, is a tabloid tactic, and hurtful to the Animal Care Staff.  I have never had one Keeper say to me that they fear for the lives of Pandas if they come here.  So, indeed there are reasons Pandas should not come to our Zoo at this time.  Them heading to their death, is not one of them.

Another curious player in the SFZoo Activist sport, is Justin Barker, who was quoted in a news article a few weeks ago, as "the head of a watchdog group called SF Zoo Watch".  Barker first appeared on my radar a few years ago when I came across his email interactions with the Rec and Park and Zoo Officials while seeking Zoo documents.  I have never heard him speak publicly about any Zoo issues, until now.  A bit of googling shows he was also involved in the effort to turn the Zoo into a rescue facility in 2008.  

Eleven years later, Barker's next "activist" efforts seemingly were the document seeking in 2019, which he referenced in a recent interview.  He is quoted, “I've been in this very, very long, slow, arduous fight with the San Francisco zoo, ... In an effort to better understand what's happening there … I have requested tons of documents”.  What did he ever do with the information?  Did he ever disclose his findings any where?  His interest seemed to stall, until recently, when he started SFZoo Watch in April, after the first Chronicle article was published.  If he's known there were problems for years, where has he been?  Certainly not at the Zoo, otherwise why wasn't he speaking up for the Orangutans (who arrived in 2019) when the were living in caged tubes?  Seems like that would have been energy better spent, than chasing the Zoo for documents.

I scanned his SFZoo Watch site, which consists of five short posts, mostly cointaining information from other sources, and photos of non-SFZoo Animals.  I'm not overly impressed, but appreciate any effort of awareness, as long as it's legitimate and not sensational.  I hope to see it at some point have some original content, and that it attracts people who actually know our Zoo and are serious about the issues there.

Someone back in 2011, suggested I connect with the In Defence of Animals people, as well more recently with Justin Barker.  As I told both the person thirteen years ago, and the one last month, I have no interest in aligning myself with those who I feel have different agendas than myself, and definitely less commitment.  Additionally, both parties seem to fall into my self coined category of "Close Zoo Zealots". 

They can do them and I'll do me, like I have been for sixteen years.  Good luck to us all, because the Zoo needs all the voices it can get.

While I do have an issue with some of the wording being used, as I did with that Tweet by In Defense of Animals, and the post it lead to, everyone is going to have their own agenda, which I may personally think is not in the Zoo's best interest.  As I wrap this up, what seems to be irking me most, is them trying to create the illusion that they have been active Activists for the San Francisco Zoo for decades.  A couple times with too many years in between, does not show any real care or passion.  It's not too late to help, but don't act like you've been helping all along.

I'm not going to rehash all my past thoughts and arguments as to why Pandas shouldn't come here at this time.  I truly believe there are only two reasons the Panda Plan should be put on hold or downsized from permanent to temporary hosting.  Both are money related.  The cost is outrageous.  The Zoo has long-standing and current Needs for the Animals who already live there.  Not making the later, THE priority, is irresponsible morally and financially. 

In my opinion, that is what everyone should be focusing on, regarding the acquisition of Giant Pandas.

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Blogger's Statement

"Personal Opinions and Facts presented publicly are Not against the law or any rules. ... Censorship and Retaliation Actions in an attempt at Suppression are frowned upon by Healthy Societies."

For Full Statement see this post:

https://iamnotananteater.blogspot.com/2018/09/my-zoo-status.html

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Will The Zoo's 95th Year, Be The Year Of Change?

Yesterday at the Zoo, Staff was busy putting up signage in celebration of the Zoo's 95th Anniversary.  

As I was taking my photo, a Security Guard came over and spoke out loud, "Why doing 95? (They did 90, and 80,...)". I said, he cause "Because this is the year shit will happen!  and by the 100th, the Zoo will be in good shape!"  

Crossing my fingers!

Every time I visit the Zoo, there is some conversation about stuff "happening", in the wake of the recent media attention on the Zoo.  Everyone is hoping there will be change as a result.  If there isn't, that just confirms how messed up the whole management structure is, and that no one really cares.  And sadly, I fear Our Zoo may not make it 2029. 

The last paragraph of my post before last, started with the sentence, " Good grief, I have to stop here."  Those of you who have been following along, may have understood that not only meant that post, but in general.  I have been saying for some time that I was working towards "being done".  That was not isolated to the posts I had in draft, but to Zoo blogging as I've known it.  I really feel at this moment in time, and the foreseeable future, there isn't much more, or rather much different things I can say.  I've been saying a whole lot for thirteen years, and much of it in repetition.  That said, you all know I will never be silent!  

So, those two reaction posts and that damn Madagascar one I've been talking about for six years, were all that was left.  I decided to keep the MAD post on hold til the pit is done.  Then  I'm sure I'll have alot to say!  As well, with things being shook-up, Pandas, and whatever other craziness presents itself, I'm sure I'll have some thoughts to share.  But, for now, I am going to try and take a break, in the sense that, I no longer feel like it's up to me to document everything.  I'll still post, but with no pressure on myself to do so. 

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Blogger's Statement

"Personal Opinions and Facts presented publicly are Not against the law or any rules. ... Censorship and Retaliation Actions in an attempt at Suppression are frowned upon by Healthy Societies."

For Full Statement see this post:

https://iamnotananteater.blogspot.com/2018/09/my-zoo-status.html

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Oliver Anaconda's Tribute Sign

On my visit last Monday I went to the Tropical Building specifically to see what was done to honor Oliver the Anaconda.

I had been told by a friend a few days before, that they had seen a Memorial for him at his home.  I felt bad I didn't know about this, and had already been to see Minnie's and brought flowers.  If there was a place for flowers, I wanted to bring some for Oliver as well. ... There wasn't.

There was a Tribute sign and I was happy to see that was done for him.

I noted Oliver's passing in a previous post (link at bottom).  He passed away on May 18th.  I heard about his passing a couple weeks later.  The Zoo didn't make a public announcement until April 12th.  I don't know when this Tribute sign went up, but I heard it was "soon after".  Soon after his actual passing or soon after the announcement?  No idea.  I'm just glad there was a visual recognition at his home.  Admittedly, I don't visit the Tropical Building very often.  So I'm glad I was alerted to it, so I could visit and pay my respects.  I should have thought to on my own.

I appreciate Oliver got a Tribute sign.  Not all Residents who have passed away do.  As I've said before, I think not recognizing every passing in this way is disrespectful.  Every Being deserves to be acknowledged.  Each one's life contributed something to the Zoo.  Not all are going to get containers for their friends/fans to leave flowers, but each one deserves a sign that gives tribute to their existence.

Related Post:

https://iamnotananteater.blogspot.com/2024/05/still-no-mention-for-minnie-thoughts-on.html

Note:  Tomorrow June 7, it will be one month since Minnie Chimpanzee passed away.  The Zoo still has not made a public announcement.  I just don't get it. 

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Blogger's Statement

"Personal Opinions and Facts presented publicly are Not against the law or any rules. ... Censorship and Retaliation Actions in an attempt at Suppression are frowned upon by Healthy Societies."

For Full Statement see this post:

https://iamnotananteater.blogspot.com/2018/09/my-zoo-status.html

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

My Reactions To Chronicle Article - Tuesday May 14, 2024

My first reaction to this article, was that it reads like my blog.  Many of the things mentioned, are things I've already written about.  

First of all, the title... "Pandas at the SF Zoo, some say it should fix "dilapidated" conditions first."  

I'm sorry, but no one, used the words fix the Zoo before Pandas, BEFORE me.  I first noted fixing the Zoo before Pandas, in a post dated April 14.  On April 21, I started a Petition titled, San Francisco Zoo Needs a Big Fix, Before Pandas!

I'm glad that notations about Animal Hoarding were mentioned.  The Orangutans situation is one of the cruelest, but not the only Animal Welfare offense to happen under Director Peterson.  As mentioned in the article, the Fossa before them were kept in temporary housing for six years.  What it doesn't note that I did, was their housing included over six months in quarantine holding, and over a year in old cages, before moving to the off view area FCC.  The Zoo also neglected to provide appropriate housing for the first Komodo Dragon, keeping him in a terrarium that he outgrew and couldn't even turn around in.  Additionally a group of Squirrel Monkeys were kept in a concrete room, with no outdoor access for over two years.  

The article reported, "John McNellis, a longtime zoo donor, called facilities at the zoo “sadly dilapidated.”  The $20 million it would cost to build a new panda enclosure might be better spent in bringing our zoo back into pristine, first-class condition." McNellis hoped that the panda gift would inspire the city to increase its annual financial support of the zoo, which has been set around $4 million since 1993, to at least $10 million, “so that the zoo can complete the long overdue repairs and capital improvements to its buildings, landscape and infrastructure. ... Ideally, however, we would have both a first-class zoo and a wonderful panda exhibit."

No shit!  And if someone like a Donor feels this way, Why are they only now speaking up?  This guy should have approached the Board way before now about the condition of the Zoo, it didn't get to this state overnight. 

And the reference to the annual amount the City pays the Zoological Society to "manage" the Zoo per the lease agreement, I've said this before, but will reiterate because it's mind boggling, ... Why has that amount not been renegotiated in thirty years?  There should have been yearly cost of living type increases.  Another ball seemingly dropped by The Zoological Society Board.

This quote by Vitus Leung, Deputy Director, was also included in the article...  "The zoo “remains committed to supporting all of our planned projects, including improvements to some of our current animal habitats. ... We are very grateful to our donors whose funds support these ongoing efforts. ...  We also look forward to adding new donors who are excited to support the San Francisco Zoo as we prepare for the momentous arrival of the giant pandas.”

More empty quotes from Zoo related "officials".  What does any of that actually mean?  It's all mumble jumble.  Improvement to habitats?  Does this mean after six years the Flamingo enclosure is going to get the last third of the netting finished?  Good grief, I know this crap reads well to those who don't know better, but to those of us who do, it's just BS.  But hey, make sure to get in that token Panda mention!  Which are also mentioned in following comments by the Mayor's spokesperson and the former Society Chair Ed Poole.  

Also quoted in the article, "Poole pushed back in an email. He said assertions suggesting that the zoo’s exhibits, whether permanent or temporary, “fail to meet the needs of our animals are entirely unfounded.”

Unfounded.  Is he for real?  He was the Zoological Society Board Chair at the time the Orangutans were living in caged tubes.  He is Unbelievable.

I don't mean to be rude, but I really have had enough of the ignorant and defensive statements by Zoo Officials, mostly Poole's, who as the former Board Chair, should have had a handle on what was going on at the Zoo and he didn't.  So, I'm sorry, but he should just stop talking.  I wouldn't care what any of these people did or said, if this wasn't concerning a place that deals with the lives of innocent Beings. As in previous articles, he continues to discard what Keepers are saying.  They just want to do their jobs, which is caring for the Animals, not be involved with dealing with the bullshit they have had to for sixteen years under Tanya Peterson.  They are Animal Care Staff and the Zoo is an Animal Care Facility, they know what they are talking about.  

Good Grief, I have to stop here.  I'm a broken record at this point.  All these people who have been tasked with making sure the Zoo is taken care of, have been negligent in doing so.  Not one of them is ever going to admit wrong doing, or apologize for the part they have played in ignoring their responsibility to our Zoo and it's inhabitants.

Related Post (includes full article):

iamnotananteater.blogspot.com/2024/05/fix-zoo-before-pandas-that-sounds.html

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Blogger's Statement

"Personal Opinions and Facts presented publicly are Not against the law or any rules. ... Censorship and Retaliation Actions in an attempt at Suppression are frowned upon by Healthy Societies."

For Full Statement see this post:

https://iamnotananteater.blogspot.com/2018/09/my-zoo-status.html

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

My Reactions To Chronicle Article - Friday May 10, 2024

Once again I've waited til the final hours of my weekend inside to tackle these dreaded posts in draft, when I'd rather be streaming something.  

I initially had my reactions to the article, that reported the San Francisco Zoological Society was conducting an investigation into allegations made public in recent Chronicle articles, split into two separate posts. I thought I would post my immediate reaction, and then a timely follow-up.  We all know that didn't happen.  Since it's been over three weeks, I'm just going to combine them.  

My first reaction to this is, was an outburst chuckle to myself, "the Society Board is the one who should BE investigated!"

While bright lights should be shined on Director Tanya Peterson, the Zoological Society Board should also be investigated. The biggest question regarding Zoo mismanagement is, Why has the San Francisco Zoological Society Board themselves been negligent in their management duties as outlined in the Lease Agreement?  

I've been monitoring the Zoo for sixteen years, BUT How long has the Zoological Society Board been ignoring their responsibility to, at the very least be an oversight entity in Zoo management?

Those  sixteen years coincidentally align with the start of when Tanya Peterson took over as Director.  I have witnessed her complete failure in that position.  I have witnessed the Zoological Society take no part in actually managing the Zoo.  The Society Board completely defers to whatever Peterson says or does, without question.  They have completely supported this woman.  This woman who has run the Zoo nearly into the ground.  Her actions, lack of care and compassion, have caused acts of Animal Cruelty.  Her lack of leadership skills and laziness, has left the Zoo with countless Needs because of no fundraising.  She has run the Zoo in a dictatorship, creating turmoil, divide, low morale, and fear among staff.  The list of offenses is long, and endless.  

Likewise I have witnessed the San Francisco Recreation and Park Department show no interest in the Zoo, which is in their department.  The Park Commission is supposed to also be an oversight entity, yet it has not.  Like the Board they defer to Director Peterson without question, poo-poo employee claims, and basically turn a blind eye, because they could care less about the Zoo.

I find it offensive that the San Francisco Zoological Society Board is calling for an investigation, when they too should be investigated.  They need to take responsibility for their negligence and ignorance.  Every Society Board Chair and Board Member over the last sixteen years, should be ashamed of themselves.  They allowed this all to happen. 

If the Society Board had actually cared about the Zoo, and not just Cocktail parties and back-patting, the Zoo wouldn't be in shambles and Director Peterson would not have gotten away with destroying our Zoo.  The lack of care and laziness by people entrusted by the City to manage the Zoo is disgraceful and unforgivable.  

The City of San Francisco needs to Investigate the San Francisco Zoological Society.  

The City of San Francisco also needs to reevalute the structure of management and oversight.  The City's Recreation and Park Department has also taken part in the disaster of Zoo management.  The Rec and Park's oversight is non-existent, and the Park Commission and it's Joint Zoo Committee Meetings are a paper-pushing joke.  

Wake-up people!!!  I'm sick of the feigning of ignorance.  Everyone's "shock" is disturbing.  All these entities have previously been alerted to mismanagement over the years.  I personally have contacted members of the Society, and Rec and Park, with no response.  I have seen with my own eye's, Animal Staff try to be heard by members of the Board and Commission, only to be met with eye rolling and reprimand.  

I do not believe any of these investigations will result in the main thing that is needed, and that is replacing Tanya Peterson as Director.  It is clear by statements made in this article, that the Board still supports Peterson.  I hope I'm wrong and that the new Board Chair Melinda Dunn will make some strong changes.  That said, she was a Board Member prior to becoming Chair, so in my opinion, was part of the negligence.

"... When asked for details, Dunn did not answer, but said, “The Zoological Society board is dedicated to collaborating with its leadership team and our labor partner to ensure a positive work environment for all our employees at the zoo. In alignment with this commitment and in cooperation with the union, we are utilizing several channels for gathering information.”

I'm sorry, but when I hear quotes in these articles from Zoo Officials, it makes my mind numb, trying to decipher the meat of it.  They always sound like slick, damage control words, that don't say anything. 

More odd words came from Director Peterson, “I fully endorse initiatives aimed at fostering positive dialogue and communication. I take immense pride in our dedicated employees and consider it an honor to collaborate with them in advancing the zoo’s mission.”  Good grief.  It's like bad comedy.  Sadly, the lives of living Beings are involved in all this.  I'm sorry but this is more untruths and damage control.  Peterson rarely, if ever listens to the Employees, certainly not the Animal Care Staff.  If Peterson ever cared about the Zoo, she would step-down.  It's been proven, No one wants her there.

Recreation and Park Commissioner Mazzola, "... said he is “investigating these issues” in preparation for the June meeting. ... “My goal is to have all of the facts out on the table with reasonable solutions so we can make the S.F. Zoo the best place to work for the employees, and the best place to live for the animals."

Again, the Rec and Park Commission needs to be responsible for the part they have played in their lack of participating in oversight of the Zoo.  In my opinion, his words do not reflect that.  That said, the June Meeting should be interesting, one way or another.

The article quotes Mayor Breed's spokesperson Parisa Safarzadeh, "...the Mayor is focused on construction preparation and fundraising for the panda’s arrival, which she called a multiagency effort. “The S.F. Zoo is one of the city’s most prized attractions. ... The mayor “supports the process actively in play for workers to report all concerns and raise issues. This process is happening as it should, and the mayor will continue to monitor all developments.”

Well, that was a mouthful of nothing.  Again, I find it hard to believe the Mayor cares about the Zoo in any aspect other than how it relates to getting her Pandas in there.

And "prized attraction"?  Why doesn't the Mayor have the Rec and Park replace the perimeter fence that is crumbling around their "prized attaction"?  I was told by that project manager, that the Zoo can pay for it themselves!  While the all other places in the department in need of a fence got one, even the Botanical Gardens that is also independently managed.  So, don't tell me the City cares about the Zoo.

I can't even with all these people's uneducated (lack of Zoo knowledge) statements.  It seriously makes my brain ache.  I can't expect all these people who are just now joining the party to understand all that's gone on in the sixteen years of Zoo Director Tanya Peterson's reign, but I also don't want to hear statements that portray they have any clue.  That may sound harsh, but what's harsh is that no one has cared for sixteen years.  It's frustrating and sad for those of us who have cared.

All these management entities, they can and will claim I don't know what I'm talking about.  I got one word for them all... Orangutans. ... Had everyone been doing their jobs, what happened to those poor Beings, would not have.  The Mental, Emotional and Physical detriment to them, is on every person in a management position (except Zoo Staff), who was tasked with the responsibility of caring about the Zoo and it's Residents.  They are not the only ones who have suffered, but they are the current poster children for why this place needs a real shake-up.

Investigate the negligence, by all involved in overseeing the management of the Zoo.

Put people in charge of the Zoo who care.  Who are invested in the place.  

Give the Community Board seats to actual community members.  People who are unbiased, not those already wearing rose colored glasses handed out by the Society.

It's too late for just damage control investigations.  I think the Mayor needs to step-in and do something, but I highly doubt she will. This is a City owned Zoo, and the Mayor has finally put her face on it, with the Panda news.  She should be making executive decisions to replace the Director, and set firm oversight guidelines to the Zoological Society Board and the Park Commission.  But, again I doubt that will happen.  In my opinion, choosing a new Director from a short list of capable past and present Staff, is the only way to show that putting someone in charge of a place they already care about, is the priority.  There are a few who know and care about our Zoo, who can do the job, invite them to apply.  Cleaning house, needs to start with removing the person who has caused this whole mess.  

Related Post (includes full article):

https://iamnotananteater.blogspot.com/2024/05/sf-zoological-society-is-investigating.html

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Blogger's Statement

"Personal Opinions and Facts presented publicly are Not against the law or any rules. ... Censorship and Retaliation Actions in an attempt at Suppression are frowned upon by Healthy Societies."

For Full Statement see this post:

https://iamnotananteater.blogspot.com/2018/09/my-zoo-status.html

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*