Sunday, August 16, 2026

Pausing My Documentation and Interest Overwhelm In Our Zoo's Future

A literal spur of the moment thought, minutes prior to the free flow writing of this post, prompted not only the feeling that is the catalyst for this post, but allowed me to let go of dozens and dozens, of notepad documents related to the Zoo.  A couple years of notes containing draft posts, thoughts, ideas, research information, gone and now freeing my mind and future time.

The feeling I referred to, is a combination of many things, but all end-up under the umbrella of, Does any of it really matter anymore?

In the greater picture, there was the overall initial optimism that once the Zoo was rid of the former CEO/Director, and with all the past mismanagement identified, real change could be on the horizon.  That has proved not to have happened.

The City has not taken the role I would have hoped.  That role being the entity that seeks change in the management structure.  A restructuring and redefining is certainly in order, yet a year later, nothing has changed.  The Zoo Board, RecPark, and Joint Zoo are all continuing as they had in the past.  I don't follow politics, but I remember the Mayor making out of the norm changes while building his administration, and I would have hoped he would have done the same for Our City Owned Zoo.  

There was obviously a change in CEO/Director, but that is where it ended.  While I think there are many thumbs-up in this new leadership, there are also thumbs-down, as I've clearly documented.  That is critical criticism, and not meant to knock the new leadership.  

The Recreation and Park Department may have a new Manager, but will that change anything in the Park Commission's interpretation of it's role in regard to Our Zoo?

Likewise, the Zoological Society named a new Board Chairperson.  Has that done anything to change how the Board views their role as the highest managing entity?  

The answer to both those questions is seemingly No.  

There are too many factors that have Our Zoo in limbo, and that's not only frustrating, but seemingly damaging to the long-term success of Our Zoo thriving, and that doesn't sit well with me.  There is the year long lack of large scale fundraising, when Our Zoo is essentially broke.  That lack of fundraising for specific projects that are of current, or immediate future Needs are worrisome.  

The current Lion eviction is THE prime example.  In 2024, when architect design for Pandas taking over the Lion House were submitted to the City Planning Department, so were plans for a new Lion enclosure.  The thing is, there was no design, only location, and only Pandas was initially approved.  For me, that confirmed what I thought, there was never really going to be a new home built for Our Lions.  That was over two years ago.  Once Peterson was gone, fundraising for Lions should happened, and it still hasn't.   Why, is the big question.  The easiest assumption is, Donors are being courted for Pandas.  Our Lions Needs are being stepped over in the chase for Panda Want.  And as I understand the process, the Panda confirmation can't come until an enclosure is built, and approved by China.  It also seems the consensus regarding future plans, whether a long-term Master Plan, which per the Loan stipulation is July 2027, or any shorter term healing, such as, What's the plan for when Triple Grotto is empty, is something we the public aren't going to get clarification on. The Zoo's silence on seemingly important things on the checklist, are a silence that I have an issue with.  By that 2027 deadline, we will be two years into new leadership, possibly with No Lions, No Chimps, and No clarification on Pandas. To me, that just seems like a misuse of time that could have generated funds to save Our Lions.

As someone who has been a visitor my whole life (63 years as of last week), and someone who has monitored all I could for the last eighteen years, I admit I have certain expectations, and will not be happy with all decisions made.  There are certain things, like the Lion situation that I find completely unacceptable.  

The smaller picture is more personal.  In the past, I felt my documentation was doing two things, documenting for future proof of wrong doings, and as an avenue to point out things that needed attention.  Both were apparently valid.  I was told years ago that management level staff, including former CEO/Director Tanya Peterson, were regularly reading my blog.  Evidence of things I mentioned being fixed/done, seemed to support that.  As well, a good amount of my documentation, came-up in the 2024-2025 media light shined on mismanagement.

Contrary to the past, I don't think current leadership reads much of what I post, with the possible exception of when I've emailed specific concerns or ideas, which hasn't been lately.  Considering they are aware of this blog, and the type of content I post about, I would hope it would be of interest, as in my opinion, all clearly comes from the point of view of someone who cares about the betterment of Our Zoo.  

This is not meant to be pompous or self-indulgent, but as simple facts.  I am not some rando who doesn't know anything about the Zoo.  I very clearly do.  I also know I have valid concerns and ideas.  Concerns that have been legitimately acted on, and ideas that have been implemented.

During the early years of my deeper interest in all things Zoo related, I became friends with Keepers and learned about Enrichment.  I approached the Big Cat Keeper and asked if I could make Enrichment Toys.  That led to being approved by Vet Staff and a ten-month weekly toy making adventure.  That only ended when Zoo politics interfered.  Among other things, along the way, I relayed important health issues I witnessed, and made betterment suggestions that were implemented.  One especially meaningful was the removal of planks in the fence at the Farm between the back corral (not on public view) and the sand corral, making a window between, so Animals in back alone, like Slider the Cow was too often left, aren't segregated from others, and left staring at a wood barrier all day.  I crusaded successfully to stop Peterson from kicking our three long-timer Chimpanzees out of their home of near fifty years.  Even the Fairy Garden, something that was recently referred to by the Zoo, was my idea.  So, I do feel I have had some impact of value.  I know, I made a difference in the lives of Cobby, Minnie and Maggie.  And, if saving Our Beloved Chimp Friends was all I accomplished, I consider that win worth the eighteen years that the overwhelm of caring about Our Zoo has caused me.

Unfortunately, I don't think the asset factor of my intentions are still applicable. That's actually fine, as I hate blogging, I need a break from the weight of feeling like it's important for me to document something, because no one else will.    I feel like so many of my words lately are left stagnant, and that's a waste of my energy.  I may post again, especially if what I'm currently investigating is relevant, but the light's been shined bright, it will either be seen, or it won't.  I hope for the future of Our Zoo, someone sees it and pays attention to it, but no one paid attention to that fence that was left fallen for six weeks, so good luck to Our Zoo, they need it.

*~*~*~*~*~*

This post is one of a trio publishing today.  

They mark the end of my blogging as it has been.  

Please leave a comment or send a personal note on one of these last posts.  Would much appreciate the thoughts and feedback.

This is where I usually post Related links and my Blogger's Statement.  Related links (with the exception of the last three), are now up to the reader to search for.  This blog has 1000+ posts, covering most keywords for your interest.  Use the search box in the upper left corner.

Thank you to all who have taken time to read my words. Hopefully you will return for any one-offs I may post, which I'm sure there will be some.  I haven't stopped caring, just need a break in documenting.

Cheers,

Kim

*~*~*~*~*~*

The other two of three...

*Lion Fundraising That Will Never Happen - An Idea And A Rant

https://iamnotananteater.blogspot.com/2026/08/lion-fundraising-that-will-never-happen.html

*Long Winded Management and City Officials Bullshit Wrap-Up

https://iamnotananteater.blogspot.com/2026/08/long-winded-management-and-city.html



Long Winded Management and City Officials Bullshit Wrap-Up

I tried to use a word other than Bullshit, but there was not one that covered everything that has been present in what has brought Our Zoo to today's financial position, and in my opinion, lack of working toward a better future.

The past eighteen years has seen mass mismanagement on all levels by former Zoo CEO/Director Tanya Peterson's Leadership, gross negligence by the Zoological Society Board in their sought task to Manage Our Zoo,  gross negligence by the Recreation and Park Commissioners in their City tasked duty of Oversight of Our Zoo, and non-existent involvement by City Officials, including all Mayor's and Board Of Supervisors.   I include the BOS as over the last year, they are seemingly the only entity that has actually stepped-up to try and sort out some of the destruction caused by the lack of care and ignoring by every other entity.  Too bad they didn't act sooner.

And the boo-hoo by all, regarding former leadership using $12 mil in funds without approval... Well, this is what happens when there is no oversight or monitoring, just blind ignorance.  Unscrupulous goings on were documented and reported over many years.  No one cared to listen.  So, no shock to those of us who have cared and watched it happen.

Supervisors

For the sake of as brief as possible (but really no way possible) description of issue, I'm going to leave out the Supervisors, since as I said, they seem to be the only ones with any sense, balls, and knowledge.  In my opinion, they should take over all Oversight duties from the completely useless Rec and Park Commissioners.

Mayors

Working backward from my list, is now Mayor's.  I credit Daniel Lurie in being instrumental in ridding Our Zoo of Peterson.  That said, it took him way too long to get involved, and other than his selfish Want of Pandas, he seemingly really could care less about Our Zoo.   The later also applied to his predecessor, London Breed.  Where is she now with all her Panda love and fundraising enthusiasm?  No where, no care.  Prior to her, these fine folks <cough> were at the helm of Our City, Mark Farrell, Ed Lee, and Gavin Newsom.  Alleged friends of Peterson, who along with her friends on the Society Board, blindly supported her mismanagement, because they didn't care about Our Zoo.  

Rec and Park Commissioners

I have never experienced a group of "leaders", that combined could not be more inept.  Over the years watching the nonchalance from the Department's Representatives that sat on the equally inept and useless Joint Zoo Committee, was a real head-shaker.  Just utterly disappointing.   So many instances I can bring-up, all documented in this blog.  The culmination reading Commissioner Larry Mazzola's statement in the press expressing his astonishment at what was being reported about the mismanagement of Our Zoo under Tanya Peterson, and hearing him take offense to the backlash RecPark was receiving, because "they have no authority", over the Zoo, claiming they are "Advisory".  Advisory is useless.  The RecPark represents The City as the Owner of The Zoo.  They are present at Joint Zoo and are tasked with approving Animal Acquisitions and other Items.  They are an Oversight entity, except I guess when the going gets tough.  Many times Animal Care Staff brought up issues and were shot-down and demeaned by Commissioners and other Joint Zoo Members, including the Zoo's own Board.  If Mazzola or any other Commissioner not present for that, that's on the collective, as all should have been informed of these grievances, but no one cared.  Just like no one cares that the Bison Meadow continues to be dried out, yet another Summer, even though RecPark claimed the sprinkler was working a year ago.  It's evident in the lack of compassion for the Bison to have a healthy grazing habitat, that allows them to engage in their species natural behavior.  

Additionally, I'll note here that I passed the buck about my Bison Meadow concerns to an appropriate Zoo Staffer, who seemingly agreed on the issue presented.  In the follow-up on that, I was told they ran it up the flagpole and allegedly the flagpole didn't think it was necessary to pursue.  So, having a healthy landscape to graze on, is not necessary for grazing Animals?  This determination from inside the Zoo.

Continuing on, I have long said the RecPark Commissioners, and certainly former General Manager Phil Ginsburg, really have no care for Our Zoo.  I have long said repeatedly that the RecPark treats the Zoo as if it's not part of their department.  Among several things, it's evident in the simple exclusion of the Zoo in their email newsletter that lists Events. They have recently posted about the Bison, which is possibly the first time since the Parks 150th Anniversary in 2020, when the last group of Bison arrived.  More recently there has been no mention of the Zoo's Summer Events, Dinos Rule or Sunset Fridays.   Their support for Our Zoo is no where to be seen.

Lack of Care from this outside the walls entity, was a main contributor of Our Zoo's downfall.  The Lease agreement alone is relative to note.  It is grossly out of date, most importantly and certainly relevant to the Zoo's financial crisis, is the lack of increase in the Management Fee paid to the Zoo.  The  RecPark (The City) should have taken the initiative, considering the Zoo Board never did, to adjust the management fee to include a Cost of Living increase.  The $4 Million the Zoo received when the Lease was signed in 1993, with compounded yearly increase is estimated at $9.44 Mil by today's standard of purchasing power.  The back pay on that is est at $78-85Mil.  If Zoo leadership manages to keep it together til the Loan is paid off, the City should put forth a bond for minimum $80 Mil, to make-up for it, so the Zoo can move forward on the long list of upgrading.

If The City had paid closer attention to Our Zoo, and the group they allowed to manage it, coupled with Cost of Living increases, it would certainly not be in the position it is today.

While on the money factor, let's note, the blame for no Lease amendments over time, does solely lay on the Zoo Board.  No alleged attempts has allowed the City to get away with letting the Zoo fall into despair, and taking no responsibility for it. The Lease notes the Zoological Society is basically responsible for everything, including all repairs, upgrades, and new builds, and that is just the notation for Animal enclosures, not City owned buildings like the Mother's Building, which is a Historical Landmark, and the City has ignored it's mounting repairs for minimum sixteen years since I first heard about the crusade for renovation by an interested historian.  We must all ask, how, over the course of thirty-three years, How is that even doable, with the inflation over the last twenty-six since tech moved in? Expecting Board Members to foot that bill, I consider pulling a fast one.  But, again, the blame is on the Board for not revisiting this agreement.  Again we could all ask, Why didn't they?   In my opinion, I think the Board was happy not to have the City involved in what they were doing.  I have always said, they think they own the Zoo, and treat it like their private club, and we are all just allowed to visit.

Apologies for the last two paragraphs, they were not part of what I planned for this post, but is all relevant, and contain info from multiple draft posts, I discarded yesterday.  So, if I'm not moving forward with individual posts, inserting here seemed best for documentation.

Zoological Society Board

While Tanya Peterson was the Zoo's main evil, she was left to run wild destroying Our Zoo, by the Zoological Society Board. They supported her mass mismanagement, misappropriation of funds, lack of fundraising, committing Animal Welfare Offences, and terrorizing Staff.  The Board is made-up of many successful business men and women, how they think the hands-off approach was going to be an appropriate way to run Our Zoo is beyond me.  Additionally, how they thought over the course of thirty-three years managing the Zoo on a yearly compounded below cost of living management fee was going to keep Our Zoo updated in anyway, is either delusional or negligent.

Last August Our Zoo was finally rid of Tanya Peterson, and new Leadership has taken over the CEO position, yet as far as I can tell, nothing else has changed.  All the same uncaring, useless entities are status quo.  Where are the Board Members?  Why are they always background players?  At this time in Our Zoo's desperate history, they should be visible, and doing something to help the Zoo and it just isn't showing.  Why aren't they doing something to keep Our Lions?  They tout themselves the Fundraising entity, where are those efforts for Our Lions?  No where, that's where. 

*~*~*~*~*~*

This post is one of a trio publishing today.  

They mark the end of my blogging as it has been.  

Please leave a comment or send a personal note on one of these last posts.  Would much appreciate the thoughts and feedback.

This is where I usually post Related links and my Blogger's Statement.  Related links (with the exception of the last three), are now up to the reader to search for.  This blog has 1000+ posts, covering most keywords for your interest.  Use the search box in the upper left corner.

Thank you to all who have taken time to read my words. Hopefully you will return for any one-offs I may post, which I'm sure there will be some.  I haven't stopped caring, just need a break in documenting.

Cheers,

Kim

*~*~*~*~*~*

The other two of three...

*Lion Fundraising That Will Never Happen - An Idea And A Rant

https://iamnotananteater.blogspot.com/2026/08/lion-fundraising-that-will-never-happen.html

*Pausing My Documentation and Interest Overwhelm In Our Zoo's Future

iamnotananteater.blogspot.com/2026/08/pausing-my-documentation-and-interest.html


Lion Fundraising That Will Never Happen - An Idea And A Rant

In my last post I noted that I wasn't doing Zoo stuff this week, indicating a break from blogging.  I followed through on that, for the preservation of peace during my Birthday week.  

That said, the other day it hit me, I need a full-on break.  So, I batted out two posts, and am now back on this one, which was intended to follow the last, as it is related to my flow of consistent Lion/Fundraising posts.  All three will be published today, and will be the start of my break.

Many years ago I posted an idea for fundraising, based on Art installations that I had become an admirer of.  I used Our Zoo's Monarch statue as an example.  In my opinion, the Zoo really failed by not taking on my idea all those years ago to do Painted Bears as a fundraiser. I chose Bears because we already have a Monarch Statue that possibly could have been used as the form.  That said, we do have a Lion statue!

My interest started when I was in New Orleans in 2000.  I happened upon their Festival of Fins installation that included over 200 painted Red Fish statues, in locations around town. I endeavored to see them all, but an unrealistic goal.  When I got home, I looked online to find out more about them and see the ones I missed.  Learning they would eventually be auctioned off for a fundraising benefit, I immediately thought of The Marine Mammal Center.  I contacted them and suggested they do the same but with Sea Lions.  They replied and asked to meet with me to discuss this possibility, and my participation. I declined because at the time I only had the idea pitch, no further knowledge on how to make it happen. That wouldn't have happened today, but was the end of that, and unfortunately they never followed through. 

To my delight, in 2021 I was driving down Embarcadero and saw a gathering of painted Sea Lions outside the Aquarium of the Bay.  They had produced thirty statues in celebration of the thirty year anniversary of the arrival of Sea Lions to Pier 39. This happened in 2019, and somehow I didn't get the memo and I completely missed the event.  Thankfully, these have now been installed outside of this corral, and many can also be found along the Wharf.

This painted statue project has been done now in many incarnations.  After seeing the Fish in NOLA, NYC followed with the Cow Parade, Louisville did Pigs, Lexington did Horses, and our own City has now done the famous Hearts several years in a row, raising millions of dollars.

Of course this idea has never left my mind.  While former Zoo Director Tanya Peterson kept Our Orangutans in caged tubes, The thought of doing Orangutans for a Triple Grotto redo danced in my mind.  Over the last several months, my thoughts have been with Our Lions. So, of course this idea came to mind once again.  This is a great idea that could raise funds for a new Lion enclosure, so we can Keep Our Lions Home. 

Ironically, with my recent posts questioning Why there has been no Fundraising effort specific to Our Lions Needs, this new installation of Crows in Portland came my way last week. This project has some of the best statue artwork I've seen.  I especially like the bases used, as they can include information about the project, a QR code for  donations independent of the eventual sale of the specific statues, as well as purchasing smaller reproductions of statues and an other merchandise, that would be more affordable.

Including a link to project site, as I liked the detailed information it provided.

https://downtownportland.org/wildwood-follow-the-crows-portlands-new-free-art-trail/

In my post from March 30, I included a notation and graphic that was part of CEO Cassandra Costello's presentation at the RecPark Full Commission Meeting.  She stated she wanted to install statues at the corner of Sloat/Skyline at the Zoo's overflow parking lot.  

Why can't the funds being spent on at least one of those statues be for a Lion and used for a fundraising campaign of painted Lions, to build them a new enclosure on Zoo grounds, so they don't have to leave?

This is my original design.  Our Lions, at home by the beach. Surrounded by pink and orange Dahlias, the official flower of San Francisco.  I'm kinda obsessed with how this turned out. 

In closing, I just want to express further disappointment that knowing the eventual plight of Our Lions, current leadership and the Zoological Society Board, have done nothing to prevent Our Zoo from losing Our Lions.  Tanya Peterson may have created an illusion that Our Lions would be getting a new enclosure with the advent of Pandas taking over the Lion House, but she's been gone a year.  A new plan for keeping Our Lions here should have been priority starting a year ago.  If it had, they would have probably had enough money by now, but I bet they didn't and don't want to, because any large donations are probably going to Pandas. It's really disturbing that the Needs of the Animals that we already have, and that people care about, are being stepped over in the chase to get Pandas.

*~*~*~*~*~*

This post is one of a trio publishing today.  

They mark the end of my blogging as it has been.  

Please leave a comment or send a personal note on one of these last posts.  Would much appreciate the thoughts and feedback.

This is where I usually post Related links and my Blogger's Statement.  Related links (with the exception of the last three), are now up to the reader to search for.  This blog has 1000+ posts, covering most keywords for your interest.  Use the search box in the upper left corner.

Thank you to all who have taken time to read my words. Hopefully you will return for any one-offs I may post, which I'm sure there will be some.  I haven't stopped caring, just need a break in documenting.

Cheers,

Kim

*~*~*~*~*~*

The other two of three...

*Long Winded Management and City Officials Bullshit Wrap-Up

https://iamnotananteater.blogspot.com/2026/08/long-winded-management-and-city.html

*Pausing My Documentation and Interest Overwhelm In Our Zoo's Future

iamnotananteater.blogspot.com/2026/08/pausing-my-documentation-and-interest.html


Sunday, August 9, 2026

Two Fail Tuesday - For The Betterment Of Our Zoo, Neither Should Have Happened

I left the Zoo Tuesday wanting to document two Fails that night, but I didn't reach that goal, because shocker, I just don't want to write about every little thing.  I'm tired in general, and especially of Zoo stuff.  That said, it's now the end of the week and I'm getting to it now.  I didn't think I would, because I've had a extreme pain in my sinus/teeth almost non-stop last 48 hr.  I got a reprieve for a moment now and since I don't plan on doing Zoo stuff at all next week, I'm going to document this week now.  Will pick-up on drafts week after next.

I always seem to be positioned to witness things that need some kind of attention.  Not just at the Zoo, but in general.

The first Fail presented before I even got into the place.  I was next in line to buy a ticket, when I overheard the family ahead of me at the window.  They wanted to use their EBT to buy tickets (under the Museums For All program).  They said No, when asked if they were SF Residents.  Then they were told it was only for SF Residents!  When they were done, I went to the window. After I was asked about Residency, I asked if nonResidents could still buy EBT tickets for $5  (SF is $3).  They guy was looking at the screen, and then interacted with someone next to him, then answered Yes.  Now I was pissed.

I saw the family, before they got to the gate house.  I confirmed with them that what I had overheard was accurate.  They said yes.  I told them their tickets should have been $5.  I suggested they go back and get a refund, and purchase their EBT tickets.  As well to ask for a manger if there's a problem.  I continued in, and they went back to ticket window.

I looked at this as the Zoo ripping these people off, and that really upset me.  It literally had me muttering to myself all the way to Wolverines.  

I'll note that the ticket guy must be new, because I've never seen him before.  He was also probably being trained, as he had someone next to him.  Was this someone there when that family was buying tickets, I don't know.  BUT if he wasn't there, and the new guy didn't know, one of two things should have happened.  He should have asked someone else, or once I brought it up, he should have told the someone next to him, left the window and looked for them to make this right.  Did the later happen?  Not in the time frame I was talking to the family.  

In my opinion, this is a real problem.  This family came from out of town.  Are obviously on a low income budget, expecting to pay $20 for the four of them and instead paid $80+.  That's not right, and probably left a tainted opinion of Our Zoo.  

When my EBT discounted Membership expired last year, I chose not to renew yet and just buy EBT day ticket through summer.  If I hadn't, and walked straight through with Membership, this fail would have gone unchecked.  How many other families have either paid more than they planned because they were already there, or worse, been forced to walk away, because they couldn't afford to pay more?

Additionally, the new pricing signage is crap.  There is no fixed sign for prices.  There is a digital screen that rotates the prices in several different languages.  Not only does it take some time waiting to get to your applicable screen, it doesn't even show the EBT prices.  I get that it saves signage money when prices change, and it's being inclusive to a varied lingual community, but if there was a fixed sign that included the EBT prices, what happened, wouldn't have. Maybe they just need a posted Museums For All sign with the EBT prices.  There is space on right side of building, where old price sign was, and that now has two other signs.  Just thought not this so sorry no photo.

My last stop was Gorillas.  When I approached the first viewing area, I noticed lots of color and thought, party remnants. Quickly turned to training window and saw the sign, Happy Birthday Dara!  I was bummed to have missed it, and pissed once again that the Zoo gave no notice to the public.  I've written about this type of thing before, so I must sound like a broken record, but in my opinion, not giving the public a chance to be included is a valid fail in the path to bettering Our Zoo.

I researched Dara when she got here, and made a note about her Birthday, but didn't put it on my calendar.  So, my bad, my old overwhelmed mind didn't remember.  But, visitors shouldn't have to keep close track, they should be alerted.  I may sound like I'm boo-hooing for myself, but I'm not.  I know for a fact people will make a point to come out for events like this.  I don't understand how management doesn't get the connection that these types of celebrations/events, when the Animals are given fun enrichment is a huge factor in endearing people to Our Animals, and Our Zoo.  It's helping to build a caring community, and that benefits the Zoo. 

The Zoo may say they didn't know ahead of time, and that's just not valid.  There is prep for enrichment toys, and birthday treats.  The could easily announce a couple days ahead of time a Birthday, and say check back for time.  They could have a sandwich board at gate daily noting what's happening, including Birthdays and estimated party time.  They could have push alerts on their app for birthdays or other special enrichment fun.  

Anyway I just don't understand it.  People enjoy the celebrations.  I've been saying this for eighteen years, but you would think that especially at this point in time when the Zoo needs all the attendance, all the community support, that this would be a time to embrace that and make the most of it for the betterment of Our Zoo, and the joy it brings to those lucky enough to be included.







Sunday, August 2, 2026

A Year Of New Leadership - What Grade Do You Give It?

My block of IN days got reduced this weekend, so writing a blog post was not something I wanted to dilute my peace with.  That said, I thought after dinner I might work on the one that follows the last and see how far I get.  Didn't even get to.  

A fellow Zoo Enthusiast messaged me, reminding that it's now been a year since Cassandra Costello picked up the baton that former CEO/Director Tanya Peterson finally threw down in defeat, letting go of her selfish clutch on Our Zoo.  

Costello was hired as COO, but after the Board's six month unsuccessful search for a CEO/Director, she stepped-up and into the difficult role of leading Our Zoo out of the destruction left by Peterson.

This person, asked me a simple question... Based on everything you've seen and have heard, what grade would you give Cassandra overall in that time?

I quickly answered D+.  I would have given a C-, if not for the whole fence issue.  

I think giving overall kudos for bringing a different vibe, and lifting morale is due. Although I think some of that initial optimism has waned. I think many people both inside and outside the Zoo, are still keeping the faith, but for me, I would have hoped to see more progress, or have had strong reassurance from leadership of progress in motion.  Instead, while I've seen and heard little things, the choice to evict Our Chimpanzees and Lions, is upsetting, and I'm not alone in that feeling.  

While I've tried to remain optimistic, as the challenges a new CEO/Director coming into Our Zoo are not lost on me, especially the desperate financial position, but my patience is fading.  I've documented kudos, but I've also said many times, that what I've seen is in my opinion, just not enough stuff getting done.  Certainly not over the course of a year!  Too many fixes that are either still outstanding or took too long, like the fence.  Even if that that panel hadn't fell, she knew it looked like shit when she got there.  If there wasn't a plan to replace it, what was done recently, should have been done last year. 

For those who aren't around regularly, the week after my last fence post dated July 8, work started on the fence.  Whether my post was a nudge, or the fever of fixing for the upcoming AZA Accreditation Inspection pushed it to the top of the agenda, it's now fixed to a degree that it looks 1000x better. Even though I still don't know why they continue to hold on to a Fifty+ year old weathered wood fence.



I mentioned patience.  I admit I have little patience in regards to most things.  If I see or hear of a problem, not just Zoo related, my mind immediately tries to solve it.  So, after eighteen years of watching Our Zoo crumble, seeing all the fails, and lack of care from all entities (Board and City) tasked with protecting Our Animals and Our Zoo, when the main problem (Peterson) was eliminated, damn right I want to see and hear of immediate fixes.  I'm not unreasonable, I know too many needs require funding, I'm talking about the doable list.  From making sure all enclosure windows have Bird Strike preventative decals, to that damn fence.  Those things do not take a year to remedy.

With that, I have to wonder, why there are so many things still not done?  Is Costello just a slow performer, or if there is too much concentration on Pandas?   We don't get any updates.  Maybe big wheels are turning, but all we pretty much hear is about the expectation of Pandas.

And Fundraising!  Where is Fundraising?  I want to see specific fundraising, which is different than revenue driving.  Why has there been no push to raise funds for a new Lion enclosure?  Is it because they don't want to take away from possible Panda funds?  In my opinion the Society Members and Board Donors should be pulling together for Our Lions.  It's because of their negligent support of Peterson that there are no funds for Our Lions.  Absolutely no funds for Pandas should come from Society Members or Board Donors, aka those tasked with using their own funds for Needs, not Wants!  The Lions Needs are in this position because of the Panda Want.  And, It's Not Right!

For that matter, where is the Panda Funding coming from?  There has been much emphasis put on more transparency with this administration, but we hear nothing about Panda funding.  I have read that allegedly China dictates that no information be made public, so I assume NDAs of sorts are part of the agreement.  That said, it's not right that this Panda Want is not only costing Our Zoo beyond it's financial means, but it's costing us Our Lions, and we are not privvy to any details.  

Additionally, and again I'm not the only one who has this question, How long will the Panda chase last?  Is there a deadline for giving up if funds haven't been raised?  

So, I went off on a Panda tangent, but it's related to Our Lions eviction, and keeping that active has been a goal.  Never forget.

In closing, since I've brought up transparency, and the Board, though not really in relation, I think it's interesting, no, it's curious, that the Board has stayed silent.  Why is that?  Why has the public not heard anything from the Board, especially the Chairperson?  Not on what's happening in the Zoo, not on their Management plan, not about any Fundraising?  Isn't a large part of the Society/Board's management rooted in raising funds?

I like the grade evaluation.  If you have thoughts and a grade, leave a comment.

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

> Previous Post:

What Will Happen To Our Lions & Chimps - The Bottom Line Of My Main Concerns 

https://iamnotananteater.blogspot.com/2026/07/what-will-happen-to-our-lions-chimps.html

> Related Posts:  Use Search Box in upper left corner and search keywords pertaining to current post.  

> Comments:  Note that Anonymous Comments are accepted.  I moderate all comments before publishing.  If you are using this form for a non-publish correspondence, please note "Personal" on it.  Thank you for your participation and/or feedback.

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Blogger's Statement

"Personal Opinions and Facts presented publicly are Not against the law or any rules. ... Censorship and Retaliation Actions in an attempt at Suppression are frowned upon by Healthy Societies."

For Full Statement see this post:

https://iamnotananteater.blogspot.com/2018/09/my-zoo-status.html

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

I used to use (search) labels, but too often forget.  I started noting "Hot Topic" in title, but fell lax on that.  Now I'm just going to add labels, keywords, etc., here at the bottom with hashtags.  Does it help in searches, who knows.

#SanFrancisco , #SanFranciscoZoo , #Zoos #SanFranciscoZoologicalSociety  , #SanFranciscoZooCEODirectorCassandraCostello , #FormerSanFranciscoZooDirectorTanyaPeterson , #SanFranciscoRecreationAndParksDept , #FormerSanFranciscoMayorLondonBreed , #SanFranciscoMayorDanielLurie , #AssociationOfZoosAndAquariums , #AZA , #SpeciesSurvivalPlan , #SSP , #Animals , #Wildlife , #Nature , #AnimalWelfare , #AnimalCruelty , #AndeanBear , #KomodoDragon , #Chimpanzees ,  #PatasMonkey , #Fossa , #Orangutans , #Barriers , #PerimeterFence , #Pandas , #Bison ,  #Gorillas ,  #Lemurs , #Lions






Tuesday, July 28, 2026

What Will Happen To Our Lions & Chimps - The Bottom Line Of My Main Concerns

Admittedly, my mind is overwhelmed.  It's overflowing with Zoo thoughts, unfinished researches, unread documents, correspondence responses, and most recent, the handful of attempts to write a new post that relates to current thoughts on my mind.  I keep trying, but even as I write this, my mind has detoured to related thoughts, that possibly fit into this post, but turn into notes for even more drafts.  It's becoming increasingly hard to concentrate on one thought, when there are so many factors that relate to it.

Without much conversation dissecting details about everything with anyone in the know, someone like myself, who has watched the descend of Our Zoo to this desperate level, and who I feel has a decent grasp on the factors, this is how some of the factors look.  I say some, as there are so many.  I think whatever ends up here will be situational to specific issue triggers.  

In my last post I wrote, "I have been saying for several years that Our Zoo under (former CEO/Director) Tanya Peterson, is "circling the drain".  While Our Zoo has been rid of her for almost a year,  I have never felt that more than now.  Since her departure the largest actions from the Zoo, first choosing to eliminate Chimpanzees and now Lions, together with continuing to chase Pandas, has been a let-down and disheartening."

I have been in many conversations about Our Zoo's future. Some who wonder what plan new leadership might have, as a Master Plan is imminent.  I assume anyone who cares, has ideas of their own.  On May 10, I published a post I had been working since February titled, "What I Think Our Zoo Needs". It was a very detailed look at the property, current collection, species lost, and future acquisitions.

Just over a week before, on May 1st The City announced it was floating a Loan to the Zoo, "to support the operations and long-term financial sustainability". I factored in this newest awareness of Our Zoo's desperate financial position, to my ideas in that post.  In hindsight I think the majority are good ideas, but in the time since then, I don't think the Zoo can ever attain them, at least not without substantial help from The City.  So, they probably lay in the distant future fantasy column.

Less than three weeks after the Loan announcement, the plan to find a new home outside Our Zoo for Our Lions came into play.  An action I still believe is rooted in the Zoo's chase for Pandas, that would result in Pandas taking over Our Lion's House.  While that is most likely true, it's also true that Our Lions will eventually have landscape needs due to physical limitations from aging, that the Zoo can apparently not financially afford.

From my position, it seems the Zoo did not plan for the Lions future soon enough (due to several factors), and now finding a new home could take more time than their physical needs might dictate.  Last September, I was informed by the Chimpanzee SSP Coordinator, that the Zoo was seeking to rehome Our three remaining Chimps.  A home for Twiggy was found immediately, while almost a year later, our two boys are still waiting.  

Now, with Our Lions needs, and Our Chimpanzees in limbo, whether realistic to fruition or not, my thoughts are focused on ways to solve those two problems.  Unfortunately, with Our Zoo in financial desperation, every idea has some level of cost attached to it.  I still work out ideas, but they end-up, wrapped-up, in anger.  

Who am I angry at, or rather who am I angry at most?  While we all know from my fifteen years of documentation on this blog, and more famously from the media attention over the last two years, former CEO/Director Tanya Peterson mismanaged Our Zoo to the extremes.  There is no mistaking Tanya fucked Our Zoo in so many ways, but equal blame must go to the Zoo Board, SF RecPark, and The City.  Individuals associated with those entities for at least the eighteen years Peterson was at the helm, allowed it.  Their lack of care, lack of oversight, blind-eye, and laziness, contributed to an overall negligence.  That negligence has played a part in too many issues of note, but the one that has led Our Zoo to this point in time, is the money factor.  And, I get more furious about it everyday.  

In my opinion if those entities had taken part in the responsibility they were tasked with, providing Our Zoo with the oversight it should have had, and cost of living increases it should have had, there seemingly would not be the desperate issues it is facing today.  They would have had money for a rebuild on the Triple Grotto site long ago, before the first Chimpanzee eviction surfaced in 2015, before Orangutans were brought here and forced to live in caged tubes.  They would have had money to build a new Panda exhibit adjacent to Grizzly Gulch, where it should be.  They would have had the money to upgrade the Lion House and Cat Yards, that would have kept Our Lions in their home.  Now, these poor innocents are in tough positions, that they never should have been in. 

Shame on everyone who did a shitty job protecting Our Animals and Our Zoo.

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

> Related Posts:  Use Search Box in upper left corner and search keywords pertaining to current post.  

> Comments:  Note that Anonymous Comments are accepted.  I moderate all comments before publishing.  If you are using this form for a non-publish correspondence, please note "Personal" on it.  Thank you for your participation and/or feedback.

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Blogger's Statement

"Personal Opinions and Facts presented publicly are Not against the law or any rules. ... Censorship and Retaliation Actions in an attempt at Suppression are frowned upon by Healthy Societies."

For Full Statement see this post:

https://iamnotananteater.blogspot.com/2018/09/my-zoo-status.html

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

I used to use (search) labels, but too often forget.  I started noting "Hot Topic" in title, but fell lax on that.  Now I'm just going to add labels, keywords, etc., here at the bottom with hashtags.  Does it help in searches, who knows.

#SanFrancisco , #SanFranciscoZoo , #Zoos #SanFranciscoZoologicalSociety  , #SanFranciscoZooCEODirectorCassandraCostello , #FormerSanFranciscoZooDirectorTanyaPeterson , #SanFranciscoRecreationAndParksDept , #FormerSanFranciscoMayorLondonBreed , #SanFranciscoMayorDanielLurie , #AssociationOfZoosAndAquariums , #AZA , #SpeciesSurvivalPlan , #SSP , #Animals , #Wildlife , #Nature , #AnimalWelfare , #AnimalCruelty , #AndeanBear , #KomodoDragon , #Chimpanzees ,  #PatasMonkey , #Fossa , #Orangutans , #Barriers , #PerimeterFence , #Pandas , #Bison ,  #Gorillas ,  #Lemurs , #Lions










 






Saturday, July 18, 2026

Our Lions - There Is No Satisfactory Solution, Only Blame.

I didn't get to writing last weekend's Lion rant.  For those who don't know what that means, the last many weeks I've been writing about the upset I feel that Our Lions will be leaving. Posting my feelings, thoughts, opinions, suggestions, and related information, all in an effort to keep this action active.  

At the start of my days in last weekend, which usually runs from Thur-Sun, I had a plan for posts.  I like a good flow, so if I have drafts in the queue, I try arrange them in a certain way.  Sometimes, like last weekend, I didn't get to my goal.  I did the Fence update post Thursday, which was supposed to be followed by the Bison Meadow update, as I took a hiatus from regularly posting about both nine months ago, noting I'd update in the future (June for the Bison).  Thoughts got a bit overwhelming, and a new realization I had earlier in the week halted my ambition.  

As I start my days in, I look to the long list of drafts for some clarity moving forward.  I still think there is stuff to document, but I also feel like it's useless to go on with it.  Not only do I feel progress in fixing things at Our Zoo has been too slow moving, this new realization has left me less than optimistic about Our Zoo's future.

I have been saying for several years that Our Zoo under (former CEO/Director) Tanya Peterson, is "circling the drain".  While Our Zoo has been rid of her for almost a year,  I have never felt that more than now.  Since her departure the largest actions from the Zoo, first choosing to eliminate Chimpanzees and now Lions, together with continuing to chase Pandas, has been a let-down and disheartening.  

All the variables of this situation are not lost on me.  Variables that in my opinion factor into three different, yet intertwined scenarios...

Lions/No Pandas.  One thing we will never know for sure is, if Pandas had never come into play, would the Zoo have made the necessary surface upgrades to keep Our Lions home?  I lean towards yes, because they did spend a rumored $300k on the perimeter panels that were supposed to contain the Jaguar.  Although that happened even before Pandas, so who knows if there would have been funds to find. 

Pandas/No Lions.  With Panda chase in play, there was never any real way Lions could stay.  There was no way, even if there were funds to upgrade the surface in their home, because their home is marked for Pandas.  

No Money.  There was never going to be a new enclosure built for Lions.  It was just another lie told by former Director Peterson to further her agenda to use the Lion House for Pandas, and look like she cared, but never did.  She knew she had run the Zoo's finances into the ground, and there would never be money for a new build for Lions.  

I may often publish words that are based in the moment, that may end-up being fluid in development,  but are always rooted in facts as I know them at that time, and/or gleaned from my personal understanding and experiences from many years involved with Our Zoo.  Recent research breaking down some of the financial aspects Our Zoo has and is facing, has contributed to this new thought, that unfortunately, while we all might not be able to grasp as a possible reality, certainly seems like a very real outcome.

I have been bothered by Mayor Lurie's lack of attention to Our City Owned Zoo.  He certainly deserves credit for getting rid of Tanya Peterson, even if it took him too long to do so.  He has been at the helm of Our City for a year and a half.  To my knowledge, he has never once visited Our Zoo, and allegedly ignored an invite to the Zoo's annual ZooFest, which historically is one of the only times, if not the only time, City Officials and the majority of Board Members, are on Zoo grounds.  In my opinion, his only current concern for Our Zoo, is based on the acquisition of Giant Pandas, not for the financial gain (which is not a given) that is being projected for the Zoo, but for what hosting them can do for him.  He has only referred to Pandas in words that relate to strengthening relations with China, and increased tourism from China, bringing dollars to SF.  So, not what acquiring them might do for Our Zoo, but only what they might do for The City.

When it was announced that the City would float the Zoo a loan, I had many thoughts about the "repayment", considering several factors regarding the Zoo's financial status, how it ended up in that position, and the role the City has played in that.  That's just a synopsis, I have a full post in draft detailing the breakdown of what that means.  This left me looking at this loan as a temporary bandaid to basically keep the gates open and the Animals fed.  It will do little to make a dent in any real fixes that Our Zoo desperately needs.  That ball remains in the Zoo's court.  

Then last week as the usual ticker tape of Zoo info streamed across my mind, I was left with this seemingly clear take on what's actually going on.  In my opinion, it's crystal since there has been no indication that there will be any changes, such as, Increase in Management Fee, Board Restructuring, All Entities Roles Defined, or anything else that I consider essential to stabilizing Our Zoo moving forward.  Our Zoo is in limbo, and most likely barely holding on.  Our Zoo is being left to continue struggling financially in a time where costs of living are a sinking weight.

Regardless of the Mayor's personal reasons, for the last two years, we who care and are invested in Our Zoo have all been fed the mantra with the belief that bringing Pandas to Our Zoo is going to be it's saviour.  While that does not align with what I've read about hosting Pandas, or what I believe to be logical calculations, that is what the Zoo thinks will happen.  I hope it's accurate, because it's seeming like all we have to Save Our Zoo.

So, while I'm still not on board with bringing Pandas here (at this time), I have now realized that a very real game plan from the City could be, if there are No Pandas, there will be No Zoo.

I can completely see the Mayor closing the Zoo if it does not acquire Pandas, as it will no longer serve his agenda, and it doesn't seem like there will be any increase funding, so Our Zoo will not be able to thrive into the future in the way it needs to.  That said, if Pandas do make it to SF, it could mean a lifeline for Our Zoo.  It would have to.  I will expand on this in a future post, but basically, if the Zoo holds on for the next two years, and does sees the arrival of Pandas, the City is going to have to not only pony-up an increase in Management Fee, but also put forth a Bond Measure on a future ballot, because without one, the Zoo will never afford to catch-up with necessary fixes, upgrades, or any new builds.

Considering the title of this post, some might be asking, How does this relate to Our Lions?  Our Lions leaving, is directly connected to the Lack of Funds, and two years of Chasing Pandas. 

I'm resigned to the fact that Our Lions will have to leave.  While the reason now is related to health concerns, make no mistake, it stems from the mismanagement of the former Director, and Board Members who ignored their responsibility to Our Zoo and Our Animals, and supported her.  The City is not without blame as well.  And it makes me angry that we're going to lose Our Lions because of morally devoid individuals tasked with caring for Our Zoo.  Each One has Failed Our Lions. Because regardless of the Panda factor, if there was better management within the Zoo, and with City entity oversight, there would be funds to have built Our Lions a new enclosure. 

I have been critical of the Zoo for not trying hard enough to Keep Our Lions.  I've come at it from the viewpoint that if it wasn't for clearing house for Pandas (which the Zoo still has not admitted), fundraising so surface upgrades to the Cat Yard could be done.  I still believe that was a doable option, if Pandas were not part of the equation.  That said, I no longer think the Lions can wait for the Panda chase to end either way to find out.

When I was at the Zoo this week, female Lion Lulu was napping in moat, but Jasiri (male) wasn't.  I usually see them laying close together.  I thought, What if he is consciously not going down into the moat, because its hard for him?

This left me really worried about the Lions immediate safety.  And, it makes me mad that they waited to seek rehoming them, until it was seemingly convenient because they want to clear house to start work for Pandas.  They have known Jasiri had this health condition since birth, and that it could present mobility issues as he aged.  They have also known they would not have funds to build Our Lions a new enclosure.  Why didn't they start prepping for this move years ago?  Certainly as soon as Pandas threatened to displace them, which was over two years ago.  I have now thought of this because, What happens if they can't find a new home for Our Lions, and there is a mobility issue starting to present, and it becomes a dangerous situation for Jasiri to maneuver the moat and yard?

It took six months for the SSP to identify a female companion for Jasiri after the loss of his Mama left him alone.  I can only fear that finding a home for them will be harder, since it would have to be a Zoo that has no current Lion, and an available enclosure.  We can't dismiss that it's almost been a year since the Zoo announced the Chimps were leaving, and our two boys are still here, as no new home has been found for them.  And like with Lulu and Jasiri, separating Nick and Qadeer can never be an option.

The Zoo posted about Jasiri's recent wellness exam, noting he was in "great physical condition".  I wonder if what was put forth publicly was the results of the complete health assessment, or just a basic all-clear for transfer signal?  And/or maybe the exam doesn't show the starting signs of immediate issues?  

In my opinion, during this state of limbo while Our Lions await a new home, the Zoo needs to immediately install cameras to monitor Jasiri's movement ability 24/7.

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

> Related Posts:  

Recent Lion/Panda Posts All In One Place - May 21- Present

https://iamnotananteater.blogspot.com/2026/06/recent-lionpanda-posts-all-in-one-place.html

> Content History:  Use Search Box in upper left corner and search "Lions" , "Lion House" , "Pandas" 

> Comments:  Note that Anonymous Comments are accepted.  I moderate all comments before publishing.  If you are using this form for a non-publish correspondence, please note "Personal" on it.  Thank you for your participation and/or feedback.

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Blogger's Statement

"Personal Opinions and Facts presented publicly are Not against the law or any rules. ... Censorship and Retaliation Actions in an attempt at Suppression are frowned upon by Healthy Societies."

For Full Statement see this post:

https://iamnotananteater.blogspot.com/2018/09/my-zoo-status.html

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

I used to use (search) labels, but too often forget.  I started noting "Hot Topic" in title, but fell lax on that.  Now I'm just going to add labels, keywords, etc., here at the bottom with hashtags.  Does it help in searches, who knows.

#SanFrancisco , #SanFranciscoZoo , #Zoos #SanFranciscoZoologicalSociety  , #SanFranciscoZooCEODirectorCassandraCostello , #FormerSanFranciscoZooDirectorTanyaPeterson , #SanFranciscoRecreationAndParksDept , #FormerSanFranciscoMayorLondonBreed , #SanFranciscoMayorDanielLurie , #AssociationOfZoosAndAquariums , #AZA , #SpeciesSurvivalPlan , #SSP , #Animals , #Wildlife , #Nature , #AnimalWelfare , #AnimalCruelty , #AndeanBear , #KomodoDragon , #Chimpanzees ,  #PatasMonkey , #Fossa , #Orangutans , #Barriers , #PerimeterFence , #Pandas , #Bison ,  #Gorillas ,  #Lemurs , #Lions