I didn't get to writing last weekend's Lion rant. For those who don't know what that means, the last many weeks I've been writing about the upset I feel that Our Lions will be leaving. Posting my feelings, thoughts, opinions, suggestions, and related information, all in an effort to keep this action active.
At the start of my days in last weekend, which usually runs from Thur-Sun, I had a plan for posts. I like a good flow, so if I have drafts in the queue, I try arrange them in a certain way. Sometimes, like last weekend, I didn't get to my goal. I did the Fence update post Thursday, which was supposed to be followed by the Bison Meadow update, as I took a hiatus from regularly posting about both nine months ago, noting I'd update in the future (June for the Bison). Thoughts got a bit overwhelming, and a new realization I had earlier in the week halted my ambition.
As I start my days in, I look to the long list of drafts for some clarity moving forward. I still think there is stuff to document, but I also feel like it's useless to go on with it. Not only do I feel progress in fixing things at Our Zoo has been too slow moving, this new realization has left me less than optimistic about Our Zoo's future.
I have been saying for several years that Our Zoo under (former CEO/Director) Tanya Peterson, is "circling the drain". While Our Zoo has been rid of her for almost a year, I have never felt that more than now. Since her departure the largest actions from the Zoo, first choosing to eliminate Chimpanzees and now Lions, together with continuing to chase Pandas, has been a let-down and disheartening.
All the variables of this situation are not lost on me. Variables that in my opinion factor into three different, yet intertwined scenarios...
Lions/No Pandas. One thing we will never know for sure is, if Pandas had never come into play, would the Zoo have made the necessary surface upgrades to keep Our Lions home? I lean towards yes, because they did spend a rumored $300k on the perimeter panels that were supposed to contain the Jaguar. Although that happened even before Pandas, so who knows if there would have been funds to find.
Pandas/No Lions. With Panda chase in play, there was never any real way Lions could stay. There was no way, even if there were funds to upgrade the surface in their home, because their home is marked for Pandas.
No Money. There was never going to be a new enclosure built for Lions. It was just another lie told by former Director Peterson to further her agenda to use the Lion House for Pandas, and look like she cared, but never did. She knew she had run the Zoo's finances into the ground, and there would never be money for a new build for Lions.
I may often publish words that are based in the moment, that may end-up being fluid in development, but are always rooted in facts as I know them at that time, and/or gleaned from my personal understanding and experiences from many years involved with Our Zoo. Recent research breaking down some of the financial aspects Our Zoo has and is facing, has contributed to this new thought, that unfortunately, while we all might not be able to grasp as a possible reality, certainly seems like a very real outcome.
I have been bothered by Mayor Lurie's lack of attention to Our City Owned Zoo. He certainly deserves credit for getting rid of Tanya Peterson, even if it took him too long to do so. He has been at the helm of Our City for a year and a half. To my knowledge, he has never once visited Our Zoo, and allegedly ignored an invite to the Zoo's annual ZooFest, which historically is one of the only times, if not the only time, City Officials and the majority of Board Members, are on Zoo grounds. In my opinion, his only current concern for Our Zoo, is based on the acquisition of Giant Pandas, not for the financial gain (which is not a given) that is being projected for the Zoo, but for what hosting them can do for him. He has only referred to Pandas in words that relate to strengthening relations with China, and increased tourism from China, bringing dollars to SF. So, not what acquiring them might do for Our Zoo, but only what they might do for The City.
When it was announced that the City would float the Zoo a loan, I had many thoughts about the "repayment", considering several factors regarding the Zoo's financial status, how it ended up in that position, and the role the City has played in that. That's just a synopsis, I have a full post in draft detailing the breakdown of what that means. This left me looking at this loan as a temporary bandaid to basically keep the gates open and the Animals fed. It will do little to make a dent in any real fixes that Our Zoo desperately needs. That ball remains in the Zoo's court.
Then last week as the usual ticker tape of Zoo info streamed across my mind, I was left with this seemingly clear take on what's actually going on. In my opinion, it's crystal since there has been no indication that there will be any changes, such as, Increase in Management Fee, Board Restructuring, All Entities Roles Defined, or anything else that I consider essential to stabilizing Our Zoo moving forward. Our Zoo is in limbo, and most likely barely holding on. Our Zoo is being left to continue struggling financially in a time where costs of living are a sinking weight.
Regardless of the Mayor's personal reasons, for the last two years, we who care and are invested in Our Zoo have all been fed the mantra with the belief that bringing Pandas to Our Zoo is going to be it's saviour. While that does not align with what I've read about hosting Pandas, or what I believe to be logical calculations, that is what the Zoo thinks will happen. I hope it's accurate, because it's seeming like all we have to Save Our Zoo.
So, while I'm still not on board with bringing Pandas here (at this time), I have now realized that a very real game plan from the City could be, if there are No Pandas, there will be No Zoo.
I can completely see the Mayor closing the Zoo if it does not acquire Pandas, as it will no longer serve his agenda, and it doesn't seem like there will be any increase funding, so Our Zoo will not be able to thrive into the future in the way it needs to. That said, if Pandas do make it to SF, it could mean a lifeline for Our Zoo. It would have to. I will expand on this in a future post, but basically, if the Zoo holds on for the next two years, and does sees the arrival of Pandas, the City is going to have to not only pony-up an increase in Management Fee, but also put forth a Bond Measure on a future ballot, because without one, the Zoo will never afford to catch-up with necessary fixes, upgrades, or any new builds.
Considering the title of this post, some might be asking, How does this relate to Our Lions? Our Lions leaving, is directly connected to the Lack of Funds, and two years of Chasing Pandas.
I'm resigned to the fact that Our Lions will have to leave. While the reason now is related to health concerns, make no mistake, it stems from the mismanagement of the former Director, and Board Members who ignored their responsibility to Our Zoo and Our Animals, and supported her. The City is not without blame as well. And it makes me angry that we're going to lose Our Lions because of morally devoid individuals tasked with caring for Our Zoo. Each One has Failed Our Lions. Because regardless of the Panda factor, if there was better management within the Zoo, and with City entity oversight, there would be funds to have built Our Lions a new enclosure.
I have been critical of the Zoo for not trying hard enough to Keep Our Lions. I've come at it from the viewpoint that if it wasn't for clearing house for Pandas (which the Zoo still has not admitted), fundraising so surface upgrades to the Cat Yard could be done. I still believe that was a doable option, if Pandas were not part of the equation. That said, I no longer think the Lions can wait for the Panda chase to end either way to find out.
When I was at the Zoo this week, female Lion Lulu was napping in moat, but Jasiri (male) wasn't. I usually see them laying close together. I thought, What if he is consciously not going down into the moat, because its hard for him?
This left me really worried about the Lions immediate safety. And, it makes me mad that they waited to seek rehoming them, until it was seemingly convenient because they want to clear house to start work for Pandas. They have known Jasiri had this health condition since birth, and that it could present mobility issues as he aged. They have also known they would not have funds to build Our Lions a new enclosure. Why didn't they start prepping for this move years ago? Certainly as soon as Pandas threatened to displace them, which was over two years ago. I have now thought of this because, What happens if they can't find a new home for Our Lions, and there is a mobility issue starting to present, and it becomes a dangerous situation for Jasiri to maneuver the moat and yard?
It took six months for the SSP to identify a female companion for Jasiri after the loss of his Mama left him alone. I can only fear that finding a home for them will be harder, since it would have to be a Zoo that has no current Lion, and an available enclosure. We can't dismiss that it's almost been a year since the Zoo announced the Chimps were leaving, and our two boys are still here, as no new home has been found for them. And like with Lulu and Jasiri, separating Nick and Qadeer can never be an option.
The Zoo posted about Jasiri's recent wellness exam, noting he was in "great physical condition". I wonder if what was put forth publicly was the results of the complete health assessment, or just a basic all-clear for transfer signal? And/or maybe the exam doesn't show the starting signs of immediate issues?
In my opinion, during this state of limbo while Our Lions await a new home, the Zoo needs to immediately install cameras to monitor Jasiri's movement ability 24/7.
*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
> Related Posts:
Recent Lion/Panda Posts All In One Place - May 21- Present
https://iamnotananteater.blogspot.com/2026/06/recent-lionpanda-posts-all-in-one-place.html
> Content History: Use Search Box in upper left corner and search "Lions" , "Lion House" , "Pandas"
> Comments: Note that Anonymous Comments are accepted. I moderate all comments before publishing. If you are using this form for a non-publish correspondence, please note "Personal" on it. Thank you for your participation and/or feedback.
*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
Blogger's Statement
"Personal Opinions and Facts presented publicly are Not against the law or any rules. ... Censorship and Retaliation Actions in an attempt at Suppression are frowned upon by Healthy Societies."
For Full Statement see this post:
https://iamnotananteater.blogspot.com/2018/09/my-zoo-status.html
*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
I used to use (search) labels, but too often forget. I started noting "Hot Topic" in title, but fell lax on that. Now I'm just going to add labels, keywords, etc., here at the bottom with hashtags. Does it help in searches, who knows.
#SanFrancisco , #SanFranciscoZoo , #Zoos #SanFranciscoZoologicalSociety , #SanFranciscoZooCEODirectorCassandraCostello , #FormerSanFranciscoZooDirectorTanyaPeterson , #SanFranciscoRecreationAndParksDept , #FormerSanFranciscoMayorLondonBreed , #SanFranciscoMayorDanielLurie , #AssociationOfZoosAndAquariums , #AZA , #SpeciesSurvivalPlan , #SSP , #Animals , #Wildlife , #Nature , #AnimalWelfare , #AnimalCruelty , #AndeanBear , #KomodoDragon , #Chimpanzees , #PatasMonkey , #Fossa , #Orangutans , #Barriers , #PerimeterFence , #Pandas , #Bison , #Gorillas , #Lemurs , #Lions




































