I woke up early yesterday morning, with thoughts still swirling about the Zoo's social media posts about Our Lions, and wrote the majority of this post. Then I shutdown. I desperately needed a thought siesta after trying to wrap my mind around what was put forth in their post. I thought I just needed a movie and a nap, but I needed the whole day. That doesn't mean the upset from Our Lion's situation subsided, it just means I tried not to think as deep as writing a post would require, but enough to make note of the continued thoughts.
Today, again I attempted first thing, but now it's Noon-ish. I can't put it off any longer, as the notes I made last night, turned into drafts for nine posts. Ugh.
This post is born out of the surprisingly curious vibe of the Zoo's post. I got a heads-up via an Anonymous FYI sent through the blog's comment form, noting the post "conveniently not mentioning pandas". Thank you to whoever sent that! I'm always appreciative when I get FYI's and Personal notes.
First, because of how the Zoo's posts to both Facebook and Instagram, are exclusively worded in regards to Our Lions future health that might present issues with the landscape of the Cat Yard, I want to make something clear.
Everything I write comes from a position of care. I am here for Our Animals. I wouldn't put myself through the upset it causes me, if I didn't care about the nonHuman Beings that I've been endeared to and who are a big part of my life. I want whatever is best for them.
I have spent eighteen years emotionally invested in Our Animals, and in Our Zoo. That time frame, was unfortunately littered with probably the worst mismanagement in the history of not only Our Zoo, but of any Zoo. As someone who has watched, and absorbed the details of endless wrongs, I am going to be that person, who dissects, every aspect of everything that goes on there.
As briefly stated above, the Zoo's post was a statement that included notations about the Lion's future health, enclosure obstacles, as the reason for rehoming Our Lions. As noted, they Never mention Pandas, or the future use of the Lion's House and Yards, for Pandas. I can understand after the comments made to my posts on local socials, and made to the Chronicle story on their Facebook, the Zoo needed to do some damage control, which is how I see this post they made. Excluding the mention of Pandas was smart, but created an illusion. Essentially, they shifted the focus (blame) on Pandas for the Lion House eviction, and put it on Our Lions, which is not right. They should own the truth, because when upgrades start for Pandas, there will be no denying it.
What they did worked. It garnered near 100% comments supportive of their decision. The Zoo's post had more interaction on this, than on any post that they've done in recent times. Probably by people who for the most part don't even go to Our Zoo, and who are not invested in Our Zoo's survival. That said, their post has also created what could be a curiosity, as there's a few different scenarios that can be conjured up.
1) Pandas are coming and Lions have to go for reasons given.
2) Pandas are coming, but enclosure can still house a Big Cat that doesn't have potential aging issues.
3) Who knows if Pandas are coming, both Cat Yards can occupy able bodied Big Cats.
So, here we are, with these facts.
1) 2024 ... Zoo is planning for Pandas, who will live in The Lion House.
2) 2024 ... The Lions can't stay in the Lion House, if/when there Pandas.
3) Dec2024 & Jan2025 ... Plans for a new build Lion Enclosure were submitted to City Planning.
4) Aug2025 ... Former Zoo CEO/Director Tanya Peterson resigns. Leaving Our Zoo in Financial Ruins due to near two decades of mismanagement.
5) Early May2026 ... Post Audit release, Zoo seeks a loan from The City to stay afloat, after severe deficit and prior misappropriation of funds were publicly revealed.
Despite this desperation, the Zoo is still working to acquire Pandas.
6) Late May2026 ... Zoo announces it's plan to Move Our Lions completely out, and to another yet determined Zoo. Noting future possible aging issues, and difficulties that could present with current facility obstacles.
SFChronicle notes, "Though the plan to bring pandas to San Francisco could still fall through, zoo management has made the decision not to upgrade the lion house to meet the needs of its aging residents"
So, here we are, seemingly exactly what my first post opens with, "Our Beloved Lions Jasiri and Lulu will be leaving their home at Our Zoo. They are being kicked out in favor of bringing in Giant Pandas."
Someone correct me if my take on this (or anything else) is not accurate. Seriously, I urge insiders to please use the comment form to FYI me, because my comprehension of this situation is...
The Zoo has CHOSEN not to Upgrade THE LION HOUSE for LIONS, But, will Upgrade THE LION HOUSE for PANDAS.
I know there is probably no funds at this time for Lions, and that Panda funding is pending. That said, in my opinion, this action says something about priorities, and who is valued.
The plan has always been to clear the Lion House for Pandas, though initially a new enclosure for Lions was to be built.
So, either something has changed (doubt it), or Pandas are still in the Plan and the Lions are being evicted REGARDLESS of a hypothetical, possible, future health issue with the enclosure.
People THIS is most likely what's actually happening.
Now if that is not what's really going on here, then it begs some questions that the Zoo and Mayor need to answer.
> Zoo needs to clarify...
*Is the plan still for Pandas to exclusively occupy the Lion House and the adjacent Big Cat Yards?
*Is one Big Cat Grotto being kept vacant for future use by Pandas?
*Why is one of the Big Cat Yards being kept vacant?
*Is the Zoo fundraising for Pandas?
*Is fundraising for Pandas a joint effort between the Zoo and the Mayor?
*What percentage, if any has been raised?
> Mayor needs to clarify...
*Are you fundraising for Pandas?
*Is fundraising for Pandas a joint effort between the Zoo and the Mayor?
*What percentage, if any has been raised?
The Zoo should NOT be Fundraising for Pandas. That should exclusively come from City efforts. Any funds raised by the Zoo from any efforts, should go to the Animals that currently live there. Like the Lions!
A comment to my last blog post had an appropriate idea,...
Makes sense considering he is seemingly pushing hard for Pandas to further political ties with China and boost City Tourism. Additionally, there is the issue of The City not renegotiating the Lease Agreement, which has denied the Zoo of proper Cost of Living increases for thirty-three years. That dissection will happen in a separate post.
Without whatever the Mayor is allegedly working on regarding fundraising, the Zoo could not raise Panda funds on their own. So as it appears, Pandas has now become HIS Want. Because it's not the Want of staff or the Zoo-going public. BUT dare I say, it is seeming to be increasingly necessary to try. I do not say that lightly, and I might change my mind, but in this moment, my mind is on Keeping Our Lions, and being able to provide what they need. That said, I am still against Pandas coming here, to the Lion's House, at the expense of Our Lions.
Since by their own admission, this move is based on a future possibility that there will be a time when as they age the yards moat access will become a health issue. That future is not now.
That said, the bottom line truth of the matter is, there are no funds for the Lions, only for Pandas. It is seeming that the Zoo does need the initial revenue increase Pandas may provide, if indeed those funds go to the Zoo, and can help Keep Our Lions. That said, there should then be no reason that Lion upgrades (or a new enclosure) can't happen over time.
So yea, the Zoo needs to try harder to keep Our Lions. If they wanted to, they could try and change that funding obstacle. Considering the current scenarios in the air, and the time frame between now and when Pandas are rumored to be arriving, there should be no reason the Zoo can't postpone plan to rehome Our Lions for a year, and try to raise funds for an upgrade to keep them in their home.
I would personally volunteer to do fundraising. I have three ideas now (increased from two) that I would share and facilitate the execution of, if the Zoo was interested and asked.
There should be no reason one of two options can't be attained.
5.28.26 ... Chronicle Article Regarding Lions Leaving - Full Text, No Paywall & My Letter to Editor
5.28.26 ... Zoo Finally Announces Plan To Move Our Lions And It Stinks!
https://iamnotananteater.blogspot.com/2026/05/chronicle-article-regarding-lions.html
For back history regarding Pandas taking Lion House away from Lions, Use Search box in upper left former, "Lions" , "Lion House" , "Pandas"
*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
Blogger's Statement
"Personal Opinions and Facts presented publicly are Not against the law or any rules. ... Censorship and Retaliation Actions in an attempt at Suppression are frowned upon by Healthy Societies."
For Full Statement see this post:
https://iamnotananteater.blogspot.com/2018/09/my-zoo-status.html
*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
I used to use (search) labels, but too often forget. I started noting "Hot Topic" in title, but fell lax on that. Now I'm just going to add labels, keywords, etc., here at the bottom with hashtags. Does it help in searches, who knows.
#SanFrancisco , #SanFranciscoZoo , #Zoos #SanFranciscoZoologicalSociety , #SanFranciscoZooCEODirectorCassandraCostello , #FormerSanFranciscoZooDirectorTanyaPeterson , #SanFranciscoRecreationAndParksDept , #FormerSanFranciscoMayorLondonBreed , #SanFranciscoMayorDanielLurie , #AssociationOfZoosAndAquariums , #AZA , #SpeciesSurvivalPlan , #SSP , #Animals , #Wildlife , #Nature , #AnimalWelfare , #AnimalCruelty , #AndeanBear , #KomodoDragon , #Chimpanzees , #PatasMonkey , #Fossa , #Orangutans , #Barriers , #PerimeterFence , #Pandas , #Bison , #Gorillas , #Lemurs




















