Apparently It Seems No City Authority Will Take Action To Remove Zoo Director

As I continue to distance myself from much of the Zoo bullshit, and wrap-up blogging, I still feel drawn to identify Why the entities who have Authority over the Zoological Society to Remove Tanya Peterson as Director of Our Zoo, have refused to.  This negligence is evident with their non-action. 

Friday afternoon I made a call to the Mayor's Office in a long-shot attempt of getting an answer to the simple question...

Does the Mayor have Authority over the Zoological Society? 

We all know the answer, but the curiosity and frustration of Why no Authority entity has asserted themselves, had me attempt to seek out what I could, if anything.

The Mayor has been completely silent regarding the Zoo, so silent one would think he doesn't even know the City he presides over, not only has a Zoo, but owns one.

I spoke with Nardi, the Mayor's Office Receptionist. After I relayed what I have known to be the hierarchy, she agreed that was accurate, but couldn't confirm.  I asked if she could confirm that with someone.  She put me on hold to do so, but her attempt was unsuccessful.  There was not one person available who could confirm the Mayor's Authority.  

I was given the options of leaving a message which would be recorded into the Community Relations Portfolio, I could also be added to a call-back list, and/or send an email.  Sending an email is completely useless for a response.  Sending one to supposedly have someone read it, and for it to be recorded, is the only reason I continue to.  When you do email, the auto reply states, response in three days.  That has never happened.

I then engaged with another source and during that exchange, it was revealed that there are questionable factors that have lead the Recreation and Park Department to believe that they do not have the Authority to Remove Tanya Peterson. 

I am continuing to investigate the validity of their disbelief.  Until I learn more, I'm choosing not to document further details.

That said, as the City Department tasked by the Mayor's Office, to be the Oversight entity (which is a managing component) for Our Zoo,  regardless of what they believe, THE question then is,...

Why has Park General Manager Phil Ginsburg, not asked for the Mayor to assert his Authority?

Ginsburg's obvious lack of action, has some of us wondering if he isn't a Tanya Peterson supporter, like the Board Members she has surrounded herself with?  Is he too protecting his friend?  Someone even questioned whether she had something on him?

Park Commissioner Larry Mazzola was quoted in a recent news article using the words, "Complete Embarrassment", in reference to Zoo leadership.   

For me the Embarrassment is that Authority Officials have let this go on as long as it has.  

It's an Embarrassment that Authority Officials are not taking steps to override a Management entity of a City owned facility.  

In what reality do Managers rank above Owners?

While I recognize that the Mayor, was busy the last couple days with concerns about keeping the Country's self-appointed King out of Our City, but When will he be concerned with keeping the self-appointed Queen out of Our Zoo?

Related Post:

*The Lack of Action by City Officials is Astonishing - And Disgusting

https://iamnotananteater.blogspot.com/2025/06/the-lack-of-action-by-city-officials-is.html

~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Blogger's Statement

"Personal Opinions and Facts presented publicly are Not against the law or any rules. ... Censorship and Retaliation Actions in an attempt at Suppression are frowned upon by Healthy Societies."

For Full Statement see this post:

https://iamnotananteater.blogspot.com/2018/09/my-zoo-status.html

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

I used to use (search) labels, but too often forget.  I started noting "Hot Topic" in title, but fell lax on that.  Now I'm just going to add labels, keywords, etc., here at the bottom with hashtags.  Does it help in searches, who knows.

#SanFrancisco , #SanFranciscoZoo , #Zoos #SanFranciscoZoologicalSociety , #SanFranciscoZooDirectorTanyaPeterson , #SanFranciscoRecreationAndParksDept , #SanFranciscoMayorLondonBreed ,
#SanFranciscoMayorDanielLurie
#AssociationOfZoosAndAquariums , #AZA , #SpeciesSurvivalPlan , #SSP , #Animals , #Wildlife , #Nature , #AnimalWelfare , #AnimalCruelty , #AndeanBear , #KomodoDragon , #Chimpanzees ,  #PatasMonkey , #Fossa , #Orangutans , #Barriers , #PerimeterFence, #Pandas #Bison

The Lack of Action by City Officials is Astonishing - And Disgusting

At 10p, just over an hour ago, I got an email about this SF Standard article, published late afternoon.  I thought, I'll react tomorrow.  I'll make a video.  I'll go to RecPark Office.  

I'm just so disgusted by the Lack of Action by Park General Manager Phil Ginsburg and City Mayor Daniel Lurie, to put an end to this whole Zoo mess.  

I just don't understand it.  As someone who has been in management, who has fired employees for not doing their jobs, it escapes me how the satisfaction of being rid of the problem, has not moved either to act.

How can two grown men, be such cowards?

How can they allow this shit-show to continue?

https://sfstandard.com/2025/06/12/sf-zoo-4m-funding/

From the article...

>The zoo operates under the city’s Recreation and Parks Department and has its own governing board. Rec and Parks department head Phil Ginsburg told Chan at the Thursday board meeting that he understood where the concerns about the zoo were coming from.<

This is literally all he is quoted saying.  Not just in this particular circumstance, about the situation at all.  Other than a letter he sent Zoo Director Tanya Peterson about her non-compliance to the Audit, I don't recall him sounding off on anything that's happened, or surfaced over the last fourteen months of Our Zoo being in the news.  

Ginsburg seemingly continues to ignore what is allegedly the San Francisco Zoo hierarchy protocol, as the Zoo is in the Department he manages.   

Either the information former Board of Supervisors President Aaron Peskin confirmed to me is accurate and being ignored, or is inaccurate.  If the later, Why can't Phil Ginsburg and Mayor Daniel Lurie, comment one way or the other, Why they aren't taking any action?

People aren't stupid, Our Zoo is City Owned, there has to be an Authority above the Zoological Society, a management entity.  And that highest Authority, is allegedly the Mayor.

I'd go to Phil Ginsburg's Office at McClaren Lodge and ask him personally to settle this obvious curiosity, because frankly, Who is in charge, is extremely relevant at this point, but the last time I did that, Ginsburg cowered in his office and wouldn't talk to me.  

It's not like he, and the Mayor don't know that at least one City Resident wants this answer, because I have sent them both all my blog posts with letters, over the last two weeks.  They and their people are very well aware.   They apparently think they don't have to answer to anyone.  And they wonder why Tanya Peterson conducts herself in the same way.  

Why is it, Park Department General Manager Phil Ginsburg, and San Francisco Mayor Daniel Lurie, can not make a simple statement answering, Why they will not assert their alleged Authority over the Zoological Society, and Remove Tanya Peterson as Zoo Director?  

Instead, they support the Board of Supervisors withholding funds to the Zoo, a move that could be detrimental to the Animals.  

This action is not going to scare Tanya Peterson.  She is going to hold her position in the fight.  She has proven in so many ways that she doesn't care about Our Zoo or the Animals that live there.

No one really cares about Our Zoo.  If they did, someone would actually do something.  Someone with Authority would Remove the Problem.   

Unfortunately the two with Authority, Park GM Phil Ginsburg and City Mayor Daniel Lurie, either don't care, or don't have the guts.  

And it's Disgusting.

RecPark Commissioner Claims Dept Can't Make Zoo Do Anything!

On an hours sleep, I wrote this post last night just after 8p.  For two hours before the night ended I tried to order my paragraphs to flow.  I was not successful, it's 5:30a now, trying again.

Written Monday June 9.

Once again, after yesterday's post, I thought, I might get a break.  Silly me.  I guess there are going to be certain things that I'm going to just have to post about.  So, I'm not trying to be like bands that keep saying this is their final tour, I am striving to hang it up, but again certain things will have to be documented, and this is one of them.

The City's RecPark Commission Meeting was today. Commissioner Larry Mazzola had much to say related to Our Zoo.  Clearly disappointed, I appreciate his honesty and his outward frustration.  That said, while it seems he truly believes what he is saying, there are things that make no sense.

I'm sorry, I'm not trying to be a bitch about this but there are many of us who are exhausted and frustrated by The City's refusal to Remove a "Manager" from position in a City owned facility.  While I was glad to finally hear someone on the Park Commission mention the need for Management change at Our Zoo, it still seems the Commissioners who have sat on what is a Zoo Oversight Committee, do not want to admit their part in what's happened to Our Zoo.  

And yes, I am going to be a Dog with a bone about this, because I have literally sat and watched the negligence of duty and responsibility for over fifteen years.  So, yeah I got a bone to pick and rightfully so.

The Meeting Video can be viewed at the link.  His words run less than five minutes, starting at 49:55 in, under Item 4 Comments.  It's quite a thing, so give it a watch.

sanfrancisco.granicus.com/player/clip/50166

Mazzola repeatedly stated that the RecPark's involvement on the (Joint Zoo) Committee is only "Advisory".  If that is accurate, then Why Do the Commissioners Vote on Items to Approve?

Considering Zoo Director Tanya Peterson does whatever she wants, if the Zoo (aka Tanya) didn't have a responsibility to report to the RecPark, the Zoo wouldn't. The Zoo surely wouldn't be " seeking advice".

Mazzola boldly stated, "It's not the Commissions fault what's going on at the Zoo".  

Ahhh, Yes, in part it is.  The RecPark and the Zoological Society Board, have ignored Our Zoo for seventeen years, deferring to Tanya instead of taking an active interest in how she was running the place. 

Commissioner Mazzola himself was on the Zoo Committee when it voted to approve the acquisition of Orangutans, which resulted in those two adult sized Great Apes living exclusively in caged tubes for eight months.  No one on the Committee or Board ever questions where acquired Animals are going to live.

Mazzola also states, the Commission, "Can't make them (the Zoo) do anything...", in reference to obtaining documents.  

That might be true, but there is a seemingly confirmed Authority entity within the RecPark Department, that can Fire Director Peterson.  They can sure do that and put an end to not only the non-compliance, but the hugest part of this whole mess.

Something Mazzola also mentioned that's a little mind-boggling, is how the Zoo's lawyer is seemingly allowed to dictate what the appointed City Official can and cannot have access to, within a City Owned facility.

So, I guess we got to rehash once again, as it is all encompassing, the Recreation and Park Department's role in relation to Our Zoo.  Not only has it been my understanding for many years, as well that of several very long-term Staffers, that the RecPark, is tasked with being an Oversight entity, for Our Zoo.  I posted recently my inquiry to Supervisor Aaron Peskin, then President of the Board of Supervisors, to confirm this.  I asked, What City entity has Authority over the Zoological Society?  The answer was, "Recreation and Parks Department, under the Mayor".

Maybe Mazzola can flat-out clarify, How his statements then support what everyone has thought, and was confirmed by former Supervisor Peskin, as they then do not make any sense.  Seemingly, the Rec and Park, as well as Mayor, have Authority over the Zoological Society, which includes Zoo Director Tanya Peterson.

This Authority most certainly makes sense, as once again I repeat and document, Our Zoo is OWNED by the City of San Francisco, and only MANAGED by the Zoological Society.

So it certainly appears that the RecPark, is not only an Oversight entity, but has Authority to OVERRIDE.   That said, it appears that Mazzola is trying to say that the Commissioners have no Authority?   Maybe that Authority solely falls on Park General Manager Phil Ginsburg?  Or maybe it's just the Mayors?

So, either the RecPark does not have the Authority that we all think, or this is a play on words so the RecPark can continue to do nothing about Our Zoo's desperate need to have Tanya Peterson Removed as Director of Our Zoo. Followed by an overhaul of management, that includes Restructuring the Society (which I think could be beneficial as a Fundraising entity only), and a Redefining of the RecPark's role.

That said, Commissioner Mazzola said, he'd like to see the "Zoological Society gone".

Does that mean he is calling on the Mayor to take care of this, since he claims the RecPark is only Advisory?

Regardless of whether the buck is being passed, there is a City Official Entity that certainly has Authority over the Zoological Society, and that Authority needs to Remove Tanya, and allow the team of managers currently at the Zoo who are willing and ready to take over, to do so.  Even if temporarily.

So, Please Commissioner Mazzola, and Park GM Phil Ginsburg, enlighten us all with what's what.

Related Post:

*My Reactions To Chronicle Article -Saturday April 20, 2024

https://iamnotananteater.blogspot.com/2024/04/my-reactions-to-chronicle-article_28.html

Here are the two portions of that post that pertain the Commissioner Mazzola.

~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Blogger's Statement

"Personal Opinions and Facts presented publicly are Not against the law or any rules. ... Censorship and Retaliation Actions in an attempt at Suppression are frowned upon by Healthy Societies."

For Full Statement see this post:

https://iamnotananteater.blogspot.com/2018/09/my-zoo-status.html

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

I used to use (search) labels, but too often forget.  I started noting "Hot Topic" in title, but fell lax on that.  Now I'm just going to add labels, keywords, etc., here at the bottom with hashtags.  Does it help in searches, who knows.

#SanFrancisco , #SanFranciscoZoo , #Zoos #SanFranciscoZoologicalSociety , #SanFranciscoZooDirectorTanyaPeterson , #SanFranciscoRecreationAndParksDept , #SanFranciscoMayorLondonBreed ,
#SanFranciscoMayorDanielLurie
#AssociationOfZoosAndAquariums , #AZA , #SpeciesSurvivalPlan , #SSP , #Animals , #Wildlife , #Nature , #AnimalWelfare , #AnimalCruelty , #AndeanBear , #KomodoDragon , #Chimpanzees ,  #PatasMonkey , #Fossa , #Orangutans , #Barriers , #PerimeterFence, #Pandas #Bison

Zoo Director Should Be Put On Leave Of Absence Until Audit Compliance

After yesterday's post, "Officials Would Rather Withhold Zoo Funds Instead Of Just Removing Director", I literally said out loud, "I'm Done!".  I felt, with that post, I had done all I could, as far as documenting the saga in this blog.  I felt Free.

A friend who is invested in the wellness of Our Zoo, messaged me a bit ago after reading that post,... 

"They shouldn't keep the money from animals. The only money I would like to see withheld is Tanya salary."

They are right, and it is something I hadn't thought of when writing the post, even though it was in the same vein as my previous thought.  In a post dated December 13, 2024, I wrote...

"So, the audit.  Reported to take up to a year to complete, I guess that means another year of Our Zoo languishing under Director Peterson and her sucking $320,000+ from the payroll, for allegedly working less than part-time, as well as digging a deeper grave for Our Zoo.

Tanya Peterson should at the very least, be removed as Zoo Director, during the duration of the audit."

I had yet to send an email, along with my post to City Officials, including Supervisor Melgar, who's idea it is to withhold the Zoo's City Funding.  I have just now sent those emails, with the following notation...

"At the very least, Tanya Peterson should be put on Leave of Absence, until compliance is achieved.  The CFO and Board should be able to comply in her absence.  There is already a Team of management level Staff, who have come forward who can run the Zoo."

In my opinion, while we wait for the Mayor and the RecPark Officials to grow some Balls and Fire Tanya Peterson, putting her on immediate Leave of Absence, seems like the obvious step.  Unless of course the Mayor and RecPark Officials can't even do that.

The Animals daily needs and the Zoo's operation, shouldn't be threatened, because this woman won't play ball.

Related Post:

*Officials Would Rather Withhold Zoo Funds Instead Of Just Removing Director

https://iamnotananteater.blogspot.com/2025/06/officials-would-rather-withhold-zoo.html

*Consider Contacting City Officials

daniel.lurie@sfgov.org

recpark.commission@sfgov.org

myrna.melgar@sfgov.org

connie.chan@sfgov.org

board.of.supervisors@sfgov.org

Officials Would Rather Withhold Zoo Funds Instead Of Just Removing Director

In my previous post I noted that I was particularly bothered by a few recent statements made by District 7 Supervisor Myrna Melgar, whose District includes Our San Francisco Zoo.  I referred to one of the statements in that post.  This post will highlight the other two.

A Chronicle article this week, contained these quotes...

"During the board’s meeting Tuesday, Melgar said she had requested that Supervisor Connie Chan, who chairs the Budget and Finance Committee, make a motion to temporarily put the zoo’s $4 million of annual city funds in reserve until it complies with the audit."

“We will hopefully be able to support this organization, as they become successful, transparent and accountable,” Melgar said.

"Chan plans to ask for the money to be put in reserve during the budget hearing for the recreation and park department next week, her office said."

This really pisses me off.  Shame on Supervisors Myrna Melgar and Connie Chan for even the notion of withholding funds to the Zoo.  

They aren't hurting Director Tanya Peterson, they are hurting the innocent Animals there who have daily needs.

You want to use that tactic, you should think about the root of this whole Zoo horror show and rip the root out.  The City Supervisors should instead urge the Mayor and/or RecPark to assert their Authority and Remove Tanya Peterson as Director of Our Zoo.  

I myself have made notes for blog posts with the words, No more money for Tanya.   But, that means, she should not be able to use any funds without oversight.  Not that there should be no funds.  

The Zoo is already struggling financially because  Peterson has done little to no fundraising during her seventeen years grossly mismanaging Our Zoo, outside of courting Society Members during ZooFest and for other Wants, like Pandas.  

A friend of mine who is also a Zoo Member, emailed me after reading that Chronicle article...

"Such a shame that everything is a mess with the Zoo and the potential funding cuts would be so detrimental to the Animals, who are innocent in all of this. The fact that she is willing to risk the funding due to her mismanagement is alarming. Definitely not putting the Animals first."

It is mind-blowing that City Officials would entertain an idea that could cause potential suffering to the Animals.  Haven't they suffered enough?  Isn't the goal in this whole saga to make the Zoo better? 

Enough is enough.  

Why is everyone holding on to Tanya Peterson at all costs?

Hasn't she caused enough problems?  

Hasn't she kept Our Zoo in the media, under a bad light, long enough?

Hasn't she made Fools of all of you, throughout every turn, by ignoring to be held accountable for claims against her, and now for noncompliance?

Mayor Daniel Lurie, YOU have the Authority ... RecPark Commissioners, YOU have the Authority... Park GM Phil Ginsburg, YOU have the Authority

YOU Need to Fire Tanya, and End This Madness.

 ~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Blogger's Statement

"Personal Opinions and Facts presented publicly are Not against the law or any rules. ... Censorship and Retaliation Actions in an attempt at Suppression are frowned upon by Healthy Societies."

For Full Statement see this post:

https://iamnotananteater.blogspot.com/2018/09/my-zoo-status.html

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

I used to use (search) labels, but too often forget.  I started noting "Hot Topic" in title, but fell lax on that.  Now I'm just going to add labels, keywords, etc., here at the bottom with hashtags.  Does it help in searches, who knows. 

#SanFrancisco , #SanFranciscoZoo , #Zoos #SanFranciscoZoologicalSociety , #SanFranciscoZooDirectorTanyaPeterson , #SanFranciscoRecreationAndParksDept , #SanFranciscoMayorLondonBreed ,

#SanFranciscoMayorDanielLurie

#AssociationOfZoosAndAquariums , #AZA , #SpeciesSurvivalPlan , #SSP , #Animals , #Wildlife , #Nature , #AnimalWelfare , #AnimalCruelty , #AndeanBear , #KomodoDragon , #Chimpanzees ,  #PatasMonkey , #Fossa , #Orangutans , #Barriers , #PerimeterFence, #Pandas #Bison

There Is No Mistaking Who Has The Authority To Remove The Zoo's Director

I've been hitting this blog hard the last week, in an effort to document as much information and of course personal thoughts, dealing with the Removal of Tanya Peterson as Director of Our Zoo.  This effort is both for awareness and to send to City Officials, as I wrap-up things here for the most part.

I was particularly bothered by a few recent statements made by District 7 Supervisor Myrna Melgar, whose District includes Our San Francisco Zoo.  I'll make two separate posts in response to those statements, this one and the next one.

In a recent news article, Melgar told KQED, “Whether or not she should continue, that’s up to the board, that’s the way things are." ...  "She", being Director Peterson.

Uhh, No, That is NOT the way things are. ... That is certainly the way things are seemingly being allowed to play out by The Mayor and RecPark, but that is not the way the power is distributed.  To rehash, the Zoological Society Board, along with Director Peterson are Zoo Management, not Zoo Owners.  The City of San Francisco owns Our Zoo, and Authority lies with the Mayor and RecPark, regardless of whether they act on their responsibility.

Melgar, should better know who has Authority over Our Zoo. Making a statement like that is not only erroneous, but misleading to public awareness of the situation at hand.   In my opinion, not knowing also shows, like too many other Officials, a lack of care and/or interest in Our Zoo.

I have obviously long understood the of the Pyramid of Power involving Our Zoo.  Last Fall I knew things would ramp-up where Tanya and the Zoo Board were concerned, so I decided to contact the Board of Supervisors for confirming clarification, specifically regarding the Mayor.  After many news articles last year, I chose to email then President of the Board of Supervisors, Aaron Peskin, who stood out in articles making statements about the Zoo. This is a screencap of the correspondence.   

You can see, the RecPark is not only tasked with being an Oversight entity, it is the leading Authority Power along with the Mayor, over Our Zoo.   I knew RecPark had Authority over the Zoological Society, but I think all the news articles had quotes from Supervisors, so I considered the BOS might play a larger role.  I think that threw me off in where they were in pecking order in reference to Removing the Director, which is why I didn't include them in my query seeking confirmation on who had the ultimate Authority.   

As I wind down my efforts in this saga, this might be my last post about how San Francisco Mayor Daniel Lurie and the Recreation and Park Department, need to step-in and Do The Right Thing for Our Zoo.

The Mayor, RecPark Manager Phil Ginsburg, and Park Commissioners need to Recognize and Act on their Responsibility to the Betterment and Wellness of Our Zoo.

I have sent many letters to these entities.  There is not much more I can do.   Anyone reading this who is moved to, should be a Voice for Our Zoo, and send a letter to them at the email addresses below.  If you want to be anonymous, print out a letter and post mail it.

Related Posts:

See All Previous going back last couple weeks at least.

~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Blogger's Statement

"Personal Opinions and Facts presented publicly are Not against the law or any rules. ... Censorship and Retaliation Actions in an attempt at Suppression are frowned upon by Healthy Societies."

For Full Statement see this post:

https://iamnotananteater.blogspot.com/2018/09/my-zoo-status.html

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

I used to use (search) labels, but too often forget.  I started noting "Hot Topic" in title, but fell lax on that.  Now I'm just going to add labels, keywords, etc., here at the bottom with hashtags.  Does it help in searches, who knows.

#SanFrancisco , #SanFranciscoZoo , #Zoos #SanFranciscoZoologicalSociety , #SanFranciscoZooDirectorTanyaPeterson , #SanFranciscoRecreationAndParksDept , #SanFranciscoMayorLondonBreed ,

#SanFranciscoMayorDanielLurie

#AssociationOfZoosAndAquariums , #AZA , #SpeciesSurvivalPlan , #SSP , #Animals , #Wildlife , #Nature , #AnimalWelfare , #AnimalCruelty , #AndeanBear , #KomodoDragon , #Chimpanzees ,  #PatasMonkey , #Fossa , #Orangutans , #Barriers , #PerimeterFence, #Pandas #Bison

What Does The Mayor Have To Say? - So Far Absolutely Nothing!

Will San Francisco Mayor Daniel Lurie stay silent on what's going on with Our Zoo forever?  

His silence is letting down the Animals that call Our Zoo home, and Our Zoo as a historic City icon.  His lack of care and action, is denying this beloved facility the betterment for Animal Wellness and Our Zoo's future.

It's both disturbing and suspicious, the Mayor has not said anything about the Zoo, which is owned by the City of San Francisco, since he told the San Francisco Chronicle in December that while he was a “big supporter” of the giant pandas coming, he was still “assessing what it will take to realize this opportunity.”  As of February, his office told the SF Examiner, nothing had changed.

Not only is Peterson's future at the Zoo not a given, so is bringing Pandas.  While Peterson can still spin the Panda illusion, it seemingly has to have The Mayor's approval.  Something I somehow missed.

A search result had me circling back to that Examiner article from February that states, Peterson told the Chronicle earlier this year she had not signed the panda agreement and needed the support of Lurie to do so. 

So, not only has Mayor Daniel Lurie been unresponsive to his responsibility as the highest power Authority over the Zoological Society in regards to the most recent issue on the table, Tanya Peterson's Removal as Director, but with everything that has come to light, he is seemingly on the fence about Pandas.  But, first things first.  Tanya must go.

It's been exactly two weeks since the Zoological Society Board was unable to reach a unanimous decision on Peterson's fate as Director.  In my opinion Mayor Lurie is negligent in his duty to Our Zoo.  As a City owned facility, he should at the every least have made a statement.  With news of Board member resignations, on top of everything else, he should have made an executive decision to Remove Peterson.  By not doing so, he is not listening to Staff, and not acknowledging that Our Zoo is desperate for better management and leadership.  

In my post of May 23, the day the news of the Boards impasse was reported, I wrote several posts.  One directed at the Mayor, in which I said,... 

"Mayor Lurie needs to wake-up and do something to HELP Our Zoo."

The decision to Remove Tanya Peterson as Director of Our Zoo, needs to be made.  Obviously the RecPark are failing to even broach the subject, even though it's their Department that is tasked by the Office of the Mayor with Zoo Oversight.

The Mayor needs to act.  We are all waiting for Daniel Lurie to throw Our Zoo a Life-line. 

How much longer do we have to wait?

How much more evidence does Mayor Lurie need?

Related Post:

*Let's Not Forget Mayor Lurie Has Ignored Our Zoo - Email Him

https://iamnotananteater.blogspot.com/2025/05/lets-not-forget-mayor-lurie-has-ignored.html

~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Blogger's Statement

"Personal Opinions and Facts presented publicly are Not against the law or any rules. ... Censorship and Retaliation Actions in an attempt at Suppression are frowned upon by Healthy Societies."

For Full Statement see this post:

https://iamnotananteater.blogspot.com/2018/09/my-zoo-status.html

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

I used to use (search) labels, but too often forget.  I started noting "Hot Topic" in title, but fell lax on that.  Now I'm just going to add labels, keywords, etc., here at the bottom with hashtags.  Does it help in searches, who knows.

#SanFrancisco , #SanFranciscoZoo , #Zoos #SanFranciscoZoologicalSociety , #SanFranciscoZooDirectorTanyaPeterson , #SanFranciscoRecreationAndParksDept , #SanFranciscoMayorLondonBreed ,
#SanFranciscoMayorDanielLurie
#AssociationOfZoosAndAquariums , #AZA , #SpeciesSurvivalPlan , #SSP , #Animals , #Wildlife , #Nature , #AnimalWelfare , #AnimalCruelty , #AndeanBear , #KomodoDragon , #Chimpanzees ,  #PatasMonkey , #Fossa , #Orangutans , #Barriers , #PerimeterFence, #Pandas #Bison