Why is Zoo Management Still Taking Risks With The Chimpanzees?

This was not my next planned post in draft, but... If I only get to publishing one post this weekend, it had to be this one. 

I've been trying to write this post for a couple days.  It's been brewing in my mind for months, so it's not a new issue, just a tired one.  

As I sat here last night ready to start, I got side-tracked by an article that was posted to Twitter by the SF Chronicle. ... "Bay Area counties urge vaccinated people to wear masks again as delta variant tightens grip."

No Shit! was my reaction, and I said it outloud, with a disgusted chuckle.   I knew this would happen.  Telling people they could discard masks was irresponsible.  As well as the extra vulnerability in stores now, this allowance has seemed to increase an already bad no-mask situation at the Zoo, specifically at the Chimp yard.

What I'm about to write for this blog post, about the Zoo's Covid Safety in regard to the Chimpanzees, is entirely based on thoughts and facts before yesterday's news.  I will note that news just confirms even more, that there needs to be stronger attention to protecting the Chimps.  Contrary to what the masses of asses across this land believe, this Pandemic is not over, and as long as the word Variant is in the News and on the loose, the Vulnerable need to be Protected.

It was March 9th, a week before the 2020 Shutdown when I first wrote about my concern for the Chimpanzees, and Orangutans when they were using the Chimp yard.  Apes can catch the same things as Humans, and with the perimeter fencing very close to the yard netting in several spots,  I felt they were very exposed in that exhibit.  

I heard that during the Shutdown, the path around the Chimp Yard was closed to non-authorized staff.   When the Shutdown was lifted, I expected it to still be closed.  It was not, and I was pissed.   

Why would Management open that path to the public, when it was not even open to most staff?

From my observations, there was nothing in place to protect the Chimpanzees and Orangutans.  There were no barriers to make sure people were kept at a distance from the fencing, and there was no signage, noting that these Apes who share our DNA, are vulnerable, and reminding that Masks were mandatory at all times in that area. 

I wrote about the Chimps vulnerbility and yard exposure five times (mar 9, aug 11, aug 14, nov 29, feb 21) since the start of the Pandemic.  Using the mandated guideline of six feet distance,  everytime someone stands at that fence unmasked, that in some places is less than five feet, I'd say even less, and one of the Chimps is sitting there, they are vulnerable to being exposed.  Factually, aerosol particles can travel up to 27 feet, so the whole area is a problem.  I used this graphic in one of my posts. 

My concern has never stopped.  During the first few weeks, I waited for something to be done.  Finally at the end of week three (after reopening), I talked to the Head of Safety.  I expressed my concern, and questioned if anything was going to be done to protect them.  I suggested a plastic barrier running the length of the perimeter, especially in those really close areas, either acrylic, or more cost effective sheeting.  He said it was being talked about.  Talked about while they sat out there, day after day, with people breathing on them?  Not good enough, but it never is.   I suggested signage at both ends of path, stating masks mandatory, that they share our DNA and are vulnerable.  He said, good idea, going to write that down, and literally pulled out paper and pen.  I'm sorry, but there are alot of people there, making alot of money, doing a whole lot of nothing on many fronts.  This situation could be a life and death one, and a member of the public has to approach them about it?  

So, a few days later, the start of week four, and I arrive at the yard, assuming I'd at least see some signs, and I see nothing.  Unexcuseable.  The Zoo has computers, color printers and laminators, there was no reason for there not to be signs, frankly by the end that day I suggested it.  I'd have had a sign there within the hour.   But here we were four weeks later after reopening, five months since the start of the pandemic and nothing.  

I blogged and complained about the perimeter fence issue what seemed like endlessly.  Then a ridiculous attempt at sheltering the most vulnerable place in the fencing went up.  You can read about that in other posts, I'm only mentioning it here for the timeline and to note that finally a few weeks ago, after staring at this thing for almost a year, I realized, it was not meant to protect the Chimps at all. 

Week five I arrived to see two signs, written by the Ape Keepers, hanging on the fencing.  Their words echoed what I suggested, and I was happy for these, but still felt more could be done.  The next week, these signs were gone.   Management had taken them down.  I blogged and asked,  Why?  I still don't understnad this action.  

Why would the Management of an Animal Care Facility, remove something that was acting as a deterrent, helping to keep these Beings safe?  

I suggested in a blog post, that they put some of the circles they had at other exhibits, at the yard.  The red circles did appear, but in the only place in the Zoo, they are half circles and placed right at the fencing.  Why couldn't they be full and placed back a bit?  The mind boggles.  

No further attempt to protect the Chimps and Orangutans was made as we headed into the second shutdown.  The Zoo was closed for two months.  During that time, the San Diego Zoo Gorillas contracted Covid.  When SFZoo reopened, the path was still open and there was no signage, no barrier around fencing.  Unbeleivable.   Then four weeks later, this sign appeared. 

I haven't written anything against this sign.  In reviewing the post I made about it, I can't believe I didn't express my actual thoughts.  I must have been delirious from the effort of there being a sign at all.  So, let's talk about that sign.  First, and I've said this before, the Zoo's signs are too wordy.  No one stands and reads wordy signs.  I think long-winded info is great, but in addition to short and to the point.  I have no idea who writes the text for the signs, but geez, it's always a miss.  Why is the lead buried?   I get why eating is mentioned, but wearing a Mask is the lead.  Also, if the sign plainly said,  Mask wearing at all times in this area, it's unnecessary to mention eating. 

This sign should have looked like this, along with a Stop Sign and Mask Graphic.  Would have added myself but my current photo editor doesn't work that way.

Last year they had a sign along the entry line, that simply said, Masks Are Required While Waiting In Line.  Why didn't the Chimps get a simply worded sign last year?  Even this newer version is configured better than the one at Chimps.  Why? 

There could have been a long-winded sign posted to the fencing along the path with the other signage.  In fact over a year later, there should be. THAT is an educational point that should be made.  ... A few weeks ago I thought it would be a good idea to put Mask Graphics at multiple points along the fence.  The other day there were graphics about World Chimpanzee Day placed how I imagined the mask graphics could be. 

Other signage I've seen online that is simple ... Signs like this should be at all areas where Masks are required.

Oh, and not simple is this newish sign at entry ...

No one is paying any attention to this one.  People on skinny paths wearing no mask as they walk right by.  People in the Chimp Dayroom wearing no masks come and stand right next to you.  The sign should just say, ... Masks Required In Some Areas.  Please Adhere To Signs.  Please Mask and Distance From Others When Six Feet Not Possible. ... People don't always read signs to begin with, they aren't going to read a novel as they enter.

A couple more notes about the plastic barrier idea.  So, it was never done to protect the Chimps, yet it was done at the Train to protect Humans.  I even saw some draped over the Bird Aviary at the Puente recently.  There's obvious value in using plastic sheeting as a protector, so again, Why not for the Chimps?  

Sixteen Months later, in my opinion any effort  Zoo management has put forward has failed.   The Chimps are vulnerable every minute they are out in the yard.  That is Irresponsible and Dangerous to their well-being.

With the Delta variant is on the loose, and others will surely follow, there is still a desperate need to protect the Chimps.  The Zoo has been packed, even on the weekdays that I'm there.  People from out of the area are visiting, some don't even bring masks into the Zoo.  The week before last, I ended up at Chimps later in the day than usual, and I asked no less than forty people in ten minutes to wear a mask.  That number is not exaggerated.  

Unfortunately, there is a good percentage of people who want to challenge the Mask requirement.  They are obnoxious, and argumentative.   One guy even asked me if the Chimps were Vaccinated because maybe he can catch something from them. ...  Digressing for one second, since Oakland Zoo was in the News recently for vaccinating some of their Animals.  I personally would never suggest this, as just like with people, there could be side effects.  I had a reaction that has lingered, and would not want that to happen to a non-Human Being who can't communicate what they are experiencing.  And with our Chimps being Seniors, that is something to consider.  That would be on Animal Care Staff to decide, not any member of the public.   That guy was way off base even questioning it.

The Zoo makes no attempt to deter this behavior, other than with that sign.  There is a Docent at the exhibit on Mondays, who tries to do her best.  She is only there a few hours, so its a free for all the rest of the time.  I have heard Keepers repeatedly ask people to put on their masks.   It is not the Keepers job to monitor the crowd.  The Zoo short staffs Keepers to begin with, and they have to be security as well?  Their job is to take care of the Animals.   The Zoo needs to staff that area at all times with Docents who are wearing the Safety Monitor Badges they had last year.  When that isn't possible, there is no reason why Security can't station there when they aren't on a call.  There seems to be two Security Guards in the Parking lot and frankly, the Chimps well-being is more important than Humans and their Cars. 

Bottom line, that area needs Signage and Monitoring.  When the later isn't available, I think the path needs to be closed.  I previously suggested and used this photo, the placement of metal barriers to keep people at a distance, while still be able to view the Chimps in the yard.  

There is no reason this can't be done.  Now that the Orangutans are in Triple Grotto, they are viewed at a distance. So viewing the Chimps outside at a distance for their safety, shouldn't be an issue. As well the Dayroom is open and the Chimps can be viewed close-up in there.

I had an idea this morning that I floated by someone to see if it was good to post or totally something that would not fly.  They said it was good, so at least one other person agrees. 

If the path was closed as pictured, but only to the general public.  That way it keeps the numbers down and filters out random visitors and out of towners, who I'd say make-up most of the no-mask offenders.  Members should then be given the opportunity to gain access by agreeing to remain masked (necessary as I've even seen Guardian Members with no mask) in that area, and purchasing an access wrist band (like those rubber ones) for say five bucks each, for themselves, family and friends.  The wrist bands are for easy ID from staff, as well the funds generated can go to Chimp Enrichment.   

Ok, I'm exhausted and anxious, as I worry constantly about the Chimps sitting at that fence possibly breathing contaminated air.  

It's your move, San Francisco Zoo. 

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Blogger's Statement

"Personal Opinions and Facts presented publicly are Not against the law or any rules. ... Censorship and Retaliation Actions in an attempt at Suppression are frowned upon by Healthy Societies."

For Full Statement see this post:

https://iamnotananteater.blogspot.com/2018/09/my-zoo-status.html

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

The Status Of This Blog

It's been three weeks since Cobby passed away.  At the time I wrote something short for my Facebook friends, intending to write something longer here.  I already had a "Passings" post started as there have been many Zoo Friends who have passed away in recent times, most without a mention from the Zoo. 

I feel that every Zoo Resident is important, and deserves their life to be acknowledged.   The Zoo seems to pick and choose who they mention.  Some get media attention, some get a sign at their home, some get a social media mention, some get ignored altogether.  Those are the ones that really hurt my Soul.  I just feel they all need to be recognized.  Each Being that lives at the Zoo, has someone who cares about them, even if it's not a visitor, it must make those who are that Beings Keeper feel really bad when that Being in their care does not even get acknowledged.  It takes nothing to make sign or a social media post.  It does say something about the essence of the Zoo, when it's not done.

I've decided to just go with the post I had started and add Cobby to it.  I would like to have done the post I intended, as I have known Cobby a very long time, and had a connection with him.  Those who know me and/or have followed this blog, know how much the Chimps mean to me.  

At this time, since I still have those posts in draft that I need to finish and publish.  I have to use whatever energy for blogging that comes over me, for them.  Over the past thirteen years of  Zoo related blogs, I have tried everything from just sharing all that I knew about the Animals in my first blog in 2009, to the Director's retaliation against me, to my Crusade to Save the Chimps, to other's with a mix of subjects.  It's been an exhausting ride, and I would love to do nothing more than just write about all the Zoo Happenings, especially the good things with our Animal Friends, but as you might know if you have been following along, I have not posted consistently for some time, so that's obviously just not something, as hard as I try, that I'm going to follow-thru on.   Zoo issues, really bring me down.  Writing about them takes alot out of me.  It's time consuming, not to mention unhealthy mentally and physically.  It's often taken six-eight hours to put together a post.  Organizing notes and thoughts, photos, links,  I try to present information the best way that I can, because contrary to what management might think, I don't just throw up made-up crap to start trouble.  My goal has and will always be to document (for awareness) what I think are real issues.  The Zoo likes to keep things secret, so most do not understand what is really going on there.  Outside of myself and those who work there, I doubt there are many who do, and that's how they get away with doing the things that just aren't right.  

As I said, it's been thirteen years since I started blogging about the Zoo in one way or another.  As a Richmond District Native, I grew-up going to the Zoo.  I have had a Membership my whole adult life, except for the two times the Director has taken it way because she didn't like my opinions.  In 2008, after losing my Cat of twenty years, I sought solace in the Zoo.  I worked flexible hours at home, so I went to the Zoo five days a week.  It was during that time that I became endeared to the the Animals as Individuals, and sought out learning about them and their history.  I talked to Keepers, and did in-depth research online.  In the following couple years I learned more about Zoo politics than I wanted to know, and that's how this all started.  

I love the Animals, and want the Zoo to be all it can be, for them.  The Zoo just needs to be better.  Better for the Animals, and for the Visitors, as it goes hand in hand, for the Zoo to thrive.  In the past decade, I just haven't seen that happening.  So I've documented it.  I have opinions.  I have suggestions.  That will never change.  Unfortunately, that has made me vulnerable to being targeted by the Director.  Regardless, I will continue to present the truth as I know it.  

Hopefully once I catch up on the posts I feel are most important to have documented, I can get back to other subjects.  But, for now, unfortunately I feel the best thing for this blog (and the future of the Zoo) is to finish those posts, because so many things need to be said.  The past two years have really proven that things there just aren't right.   It's upsetting and frustrating, but mostly sad, because I think our Zoo in real trouble. 

As of July 1, 2021 ... Blogger will no longer send out New Post Alerts to Subscribers.  If you are a Subscriber, you can follow me on Twitter ( leo811sf )  if you want to be alerted.  

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Blogger's Statement

"Personal Opinions and Facts presented publicly are Not against the law or any rules. ... Censorship and Retaliation Actions in an attempt at Suppression are frowned upon by Healthy Societies."

For Full Statement see this post:

https://iamnotananteater.blogspot.com/2018/09/my-zoo-status.html

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

What Does It Take To Get Thrown Out Of The Zoo?

I'm going to interrupt the posts I had from last weekend, to post this in a timely manner.

I wrote about this in the moment at the beginning of this week, while sitting in my car. I never write posts on the phone, but was very emotional and just wanted to get it out.  Phone glitched and I lost the original.  After that, I just needed to move on with my day and feel better.  

My usual visit days are Monday, Tuesday, and Wednesday.  As I headed to the Zoo Tuesday, I stopped to see the Owls at Sutro Park.  It was 8:30a and with my impending Zoo visit, my mind and emotions were still on something that happened at the Zoo the day before.  I experienced something I never have.  I didn't want to go to the Zoo.  By 10a I had decided not to and was really bummed.

I avoided people all day and had a great time with wildlife. Here's a photo of Papa Owl and of a Family of Western Bluebirds I watched for over an hour, as the fledgling was practicing flying, Mama and Papa with it, while they also flew to the cavity nest to feed their other chicks. 

So, back to what was bothering me.  Actually nothing new, the same old irritation at people not wearing masks.  What finally got to me this day, was the continued situation of the Zoo not throwing people out, who are deliberately offensive to other guests.  

What happened Monday, was the second time I reported a no mask situation and there was an attack on me that was not handled what I consider appropriately, and by that I mean the offenders should have been thrown out. 

So, I was walking on a path, and I saw two women coming toward me at a distance, one with her mask down.  I waited til they were about twenty feet from me, to see if she was going to put hers up.  With no place to distance myself, I motioned, and said, Can you put your mask up, we are crossing paths.  She looked at her friend, and put it up.  That should have been the end of it, but with the self-entitled it never is.  She stopped when she got to me and asked if I worked there.  I said, No, but I can easily call someone who does, who will then tell you the rules you already know.  She then says, You do you.  At that point I was ready to call Security, and I turn and her friend, is about two feet from me and has completely removed her mask, just to be a jerk.  They walk off.  Security happens by and I point them out and relay what happened, noting that the friend deliberately put forth what I consider a health assault and they should be thrown out.  Of course, I saw them again, so nothing happened.  ... I had previously called Security when a guy with two kids came and stood next to me at Gorillas, all not wearing masks.  I could have walked away, but why should I when there are rules.   I distanced myself and told him they all needed to be wearing masks, and he proceeding to school me on why they weren't, eventually calling me the Devil for even suggesting it.   I walked away and called Security.  Security talked to him, during which he was yelling at me and acting irrational.  His outburst actually had me a bit shaken.  When I saw Security later I asked what happened.  He said he filed a report and it was up to management to take action.  In my opinion calling me the Devil should have been cause for being thrown out, and if a Member (something they never ask offenders) further reprimand, but instead, he was was allowed to continue on with his day.  

I feel like the Zoo's policy coddles the offenders and the hell with protecting the other guests.   It's always been like that, even pre-pandemic.  I have reported people harassing and harming Animals and they don't even get thrown out.  I've even been sworn at for telling people not to throw stuff at the Animals, and Zoo management does nothing.  There's a sign of rules at the entrance that states something to the effect of, If you are offensive to another guest you may be asked to leave.  That has never been my experience.

I know Zoo management could care less about my experiences there and I know there are different rules for me than there is for other people.  Maybe these outcomes are just another case of that.  I guarantee, if I had sworn at someone or called them the Devil, I would have been banned from the place.

I know there are other guests being verbally and behaviorally assaulted and they just don't report it. There are alot of Members I see regularly and they are uncomfortable with the dining situation, people allowed to go maskless in general, crossing paths with them, and standing right next to them.  So, I'm not the only one who is sick of it.  One relayed an incident where she asked someone to put their mask up and was called a bitch.  This is all outrageous. Just because we are <cough> reminding people of the rules, we should not be victims and offenders should not go unpunished.  Non-members should to be asked to leave without a refund.  Members should be asked to leave for the day and have their memberships put on probation for at least a month.  

People know the rules when they make their reservations.  That should be binding.  Especially to Members.  I had an interaction at Chimps recently, that was a Wow moment. 

It wasn't crowded, I was in my circle, and two stroller mom's with additional kids approach.  They pass the open circle and stand in between, one about a foot from me.  I waited a minute, then pointed to the available circle, and said, there's a circle, we are supposed to be at a distance.  She sarcastically said, Oh we're going to do this?  I said, those are the rules. She didn't move and replied, You should stay home.  I thought, WTF? Are you kidding me?  I said, Well you should follow the rules.  I just stepped back out of my circle to distance myself.  When I did, I noticed she was wearing a Guardian Member lanyard.  So disgusted that a Member, told a random guest they shouldn't come to the Zoo, and because it was based on following rules.  I didn't report it, because nothing would have happened.  

This is what happens when rules aren't strict (leaving it up to basic signage and people's own responsibility) and there are no consequences for not following them.

I know there is always going to be some jerks who just won't follow rules, but frankly the Zoo can do better with the no mask issue.   Especially when it comes to the roaming maskless eating and drinking situation, that has become out of control.  I've wrote about it before, but maybe I need to post again and put some thoughts in their collective brains that haven't produced good protocol in the past year.

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Blogger's Statement

"Personal Opinions and Facts presented publicly are Not against the law or any rules. ... Censorship and Retaliation Actions in an attempt at Suppression are frowned upon by Healthy Societies."

For Full Statement see this post:

https://iamnotananteater.blogspot.com/2018/09/my-zoo-status.html

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Orangutan Update Part Two - The Current State Of Triple Grotto & My Ideas

This post was part of the previous post.  It stands alone, but noting this in case you want to stay updated with the Saga that is, a home for the Orangutans. 

So, as a reminder, this is what has been done at Triple Grotto.  ...

Everything that has been done, is so that the Keepers can access... since there is no netting.

AND this is because there are allegedly no funds (because factually no fundraising was ever done) to do anything in a way that would provide an appropriate enclosure.  

Nothing has been done for the Orangutans. 

When I wrote the first idea, it was last weekend, after seeing the Middle Grotto structure had been cut in half.  

Middle Grotto cut in half

I've mentioned netting in several posts.  I still believe that would have been the obvious and ideal way to go, considering the moat and the island size limitation.  It would have also provided them with something built in that they could use to move about naturally. Something they already make great use of when they are in the Chimpanzee yard. Per the Orangutan Husbandry Guidelines.....  Triple Grotto as is, is not set-up for climbing and swinging.  The Animal Care Staff will have to rig up hose and rope to create these options.  That is something that would have been done anyway, but considering the limiting size and structure already on the islands, it seems it might be a challenge.

I had thought of, and was going to suggest a climbing panel like what was on one side of an old Chimp structure in South Grotto years ago, might be a good idea for one of the two existing structures.  Then last week I noticed half the structure in Middle Grotto had to be cut down, due to corrosion. As well, in a discussion learned that those cargo style nets can be dangerous.  So, I then I had another idea.  I suggested that they build up another level with a platform, and look into a panel of some kind of netting, if possible, the same used in the Chimp yard, and attach it to one or a couple sides of the structure. Because as is, that half structure does nothing for the Orangutans vertical needs.  Just ideas, I know Animal Staff will do the best they can with what they have. 

North Grotto w/Net Idea

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Blogger's Statement

"Personal Opinions and Facts presented publicly are Not against the law or any rules. ... Censorship and Retaliation Actions in an attempt at Suppression are frowned upon by Healthy Societies."

For Full Statement see this post:

https://iamnotananteater.blogspot.com/2018/09/my-zoo-status.html

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

SFZoo Orangutan Update Part One - Franklin Park Zoo Plans New Ape Enclosure

Last weekend, I did something I had never done before.  I wrote three blog posts at the same time.  I near finished all of them, so it was quite productive.  I planned to finish in the evenings during the week and publish.  Days ran too long, so that didn't happen. 

This week presented an idea that went with the second half of this post.  So, I have now split the post.  Please look for the post following this one for part two. 

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

I've had this sitting here since the announcement a couple weeks ago. 

https://www.zoonewengland.org/zoo-news/2021/march/franklin-park-zoo-announces-new-outdoor-gorilla-habitat/

I understand that this is not directly related to our SFZoo Orangutan situation, but it indeed indirectly does.  This is a Great Ape enclosure.  Same basic design, whether for Gorillas, Orangutans, or another Great Ape species.  This is a new build, while our Triple Grotto is a renovation of an existing enclosure.  This is very modern, with a price tag to match.  

Point is, without any grand modifications, to Triple Grotto (being renovated for the Orangutans), there weren't a group of Zoological Society donors who would fund at the very least netting?  Not even filling in the moats, just netting so we could have avoided the skyscraper bridge eyesore.  And yes, I'm stuck on the netting aspect for the simple reason, if netting was part of this renovation, all that other cement and metal crap would not be necessary.  And yes, I know that there are plenty of Orangutan enclosures that are not netted, but I would bet that most have a substantial amount of topical space, while our existing grotto islands have very little.  

I have written so many things about Triple Grotto and configuration ideas.  One being, netting South Grotto before Orangutans were out of quarantine, so they had a dedicated space of their own from the start.  It didnt even need to be anything more than that.  Just so they had SOMETHING!  At this point, with last week being the two year anniversary of Ollie's (the male) arrival here, with female Amoi arriving two weeks later, at least they would have had a home of their own, two years ago.  Think about that. It's been two years.  Over 100 weeks.  Moving on.  I also have maintained filling in the moat (if net used) would be ideal for optimum topical space.  Even if they went back to their original plan of renovating only one grotto, but that one grotto with moat filled in and netting, that would be better than what they have done.

Another idea, keeping with the use of two Grottos, either initially or in the future, with more funding, or should I say, actual funding, was a walk-in viewing area like at Wolves could have been added in between the Grottos (where they have built the bridge craziness) and made it really nice, for the Orangutans, and visually pleasing to the aesthetics of the Zoo.  Adding an overhang on both sides of a viewing window would have not only provided a shelter area for the Orangutans, but also for visitors during rainy days.

Blue would be Net

Gold Walk-In viewing

Orange Windows

I'm not unreasonable.  I know all Zoos are struggling in the wake of the shutdowns and work with limited funds even before, but when I see basically nothing be done to raise funds for the better part of twelve years, it's upsetting and frustrating.

I have a post in draft about the lack of fundraising so the only other thing I'll say in this one, is a repeat from previous posts.  The San Francisco Zoo Director and Zoological Society decided to acquire Orangutans at the very least six years ago.  At that point, fundraising should have begun.  No excuses. That is what should have happened and it didn't.  Everyone should be asking why.

Yes I realize all this is moot, since the Prison Pit is already done.  I can't keep ideas from flowing, and I'm thankful my brain works that way.  It's good to think about what could have been.  What should have been.  When you do, also think about why this situation is a huge Zoo Fail.

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Blogger's Statement

"Personal Opinions and Facts presented publicly are Not against the law or any rules. ... Censorship and Retaliation Actions in an attempt at Suppression are frowned upon by Healthy Societies."

For Full Statement see this post:

https://iamnotananteater.blogspot.com/2018/09/my-zoo-status.html

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Less and Less Space For The Orangutans - Another Triple Grotto Update

Not only is there less and less space, I have still not seen one thing that is FOR the Orangutans.

As with my previous post titled,  Disgust At The Triple Grotto Renovation - Our Poor Orangutans, I was not going to do another Orangutan/Triple Grotto update until this joke of an enclosure opened, but I missed something in that post that really needs to be pointed out.  

The situation is getting worse, and I'm not exaggerating when I say this makes me physically sick.  It's hard to even go by there, just looking at (or thinking about) it makes me want to cry.  Tears are welling as I type this, with visions of this sick plan and the life Ollie and Amoi will be stuck with in this disturbing offering of a home.

So, the only new thing for this week, is the prison wiring went up, to keep the Orangutans from accessing the roof of the night quarters building. ... Hard to see in this photo, but it looked like a few rows of probably hot wire, around the roof of the building.

Additionally, what is worse is something I never even considered was permanent, when I saw it last week.  The huge box that holds and I assume acts as a stopper for the skyscraper bridge, is there to stay.  It's obvious that it is permanent, but like I said, never crossed my mind last week, as I'm pretty sure I was distracted by the whole bridge and platform monstrosity. 

The box, which is in both grottos, looks to be about 3.5 ft square cube.  Not only are they an additional ugly-ass eyesore, that is alot of space being taken up when you think about how small the topical part of the island is to begin with.

To get an idea of how these boxes, even further shrink the topical area. ... The islands are outlined.  They are approximately the same size as one quarter of the Chimp yard, as shown.  The red boxes on the islands show actual size, as the one that has two includes the twigging mound that is similar in size.  

It's hard to believe that this falls into any current aka modern guideline the AZA (Association of Zoos and Aquariums) has for housing Orangutans, or any other Animal.  But it's also hard to believe that the AZA and their SSP (Species Survival Plan) breeding program would send the Orangutans here without a dedicated enclosure.   But, they did. 

Two years later and I would still like to know what transpired between the AZA/SSP and our Zoo Director to make that happen.  It's truly shameful, yet neither party seems to think so. 

That all said, I personally don't have any faith in the AZA doing the right thing in many circumstances, so I'm not entirely surprised.  I started a post in early December 2019 titled, Is The AZA a Questionable Leader In Zoo Animal Welfare?  It was born out of a specific situation, but that was just a culmination of too many questionable instances put forth by the AZA/SSP that I've either known about at our SFZoo or read about in other Zoos.  

My draft list had gotten too lengthy for me to ever have the energy or the time to get to, so I narrowed it down to what I felt most needed to be documented, and that AZA post didn't make the cut.   That said, there are some very relevant points that come to mind that I'm going to include in this post. 

The first time I approached the AZA with a concern, I was told to send it to the Accreditation department.  Note that anytime you contact them, they usually do not respond.  You put forth your concern and it either gets attention or doesn't, and you never know what, if any action was taken.  

After years of ignoring my shares via Twitter to them about the breachable barriers that put Animals lives at risk, they contacted me and asked for more information.  Yet, of course when I sent it, there was no response.  There was also no action, as those breachable barriers are exactly the same years later.

Barrier issues is just one issue point.  Other's include, transferring and/or housing of Animals, when in my opinion it's not been in their best interest.  This includes, like with the Orangutans, acquiring Animals that have no place to live or have been hoarded away to inferior housing.  

One example that was disgusting, is the Zoo housed Squirrel Monkeys in a concrete room, with no outdoor access for more than four years.  Either the AZA didn't know about it, or didn't care, but what is curious is that the Santa Ana Zoo got it's accreditation yanked for the way they housed small Monkey species, that actually had an outdoor area.  There just seems to be something not quite right with the things that are allowed to happen at SFZoo.

An article about the Santa Ana Zoo accreditation issue.  Noted in the article is the reasoning.  Here's a screencap. 

https://www.ocregister.com/2017/06/09/outdated-monkey-exhibits-lead-to-loss-of-accreditation-for-santa-ana-zoo-but-officials-have-appealed/

Yet, the AZA has no issue with sending Orangutans, to live at a Zoo that has no dedicated enclosure for them.  It will be interesting to see what they think when they see Triple Grotto!  Still outdated, and now surrounded in concrete. It surely is NOT modern!

So, I don't know what they consider good or bad. It seems to be fluid, depending on what Zoo you are.  We certainly seem to get passes in situations that seem disgraceful and in the current (yet, not only), case of the Orangutans, cruel.

San Francisco Zoo accreditation is this year.  Will the AZA think this shit-show at Triple Grotto is an acceptable housing situation for Great Apes in the the year 2021?

Related post and video

https://iamnotananteater.blogspot.com/2021/03/disgust-at-triple-grotto-renovation-our.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ykFLabiXrs

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Blogger's Statement

"Personal Opinions and Facts presented publicly are Not against the law or any rules. ... Censorship and Retaliation Actions in an attempt at Suppression are frowned upon by Healthy Societies."

For Full Statement see this post:

https://iamnotananteater.blogspot.com/2018/09/my-zoo-status.html

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Palace Of Fine Arts Swan Update - Is Blanche Being Fed and Checked on Daily?

I visited Blanche yesterday afternoon.  It was very upsetting, and now there are so many questions.

Last week when I heard she was returned to the Palace of Fine Arts I was shocked and sad for her.  In my opinion, doing so was Irresponsible and Cruel.   

Here is the link, for those who need to catch up on her situation.

https://iamnotananteater.blogspot.com/2021/03/palace-of-fine-arts-swans-update-male.html

I was already in for the week when I heard this news, so I planned to check on her first thing Monday morning.  I didn't get there Monday or Tuesday, and was disappointed in myself.  So, yesterday was my next day out again. ... I'm a believer that everything happens the way it's supposed to, and the Universe confirms that every time it positions me where I need to be, and at the time I need to be there.

When I got to the Palace, unfortunately it was packed, and too many people with no mask.  I maneuvered that health assault obstacle course over to Blanche, who was at the edge of the Lagoon, with a woman who was feeding her, her daily corn.  

From visiting regularly for many years, I know the Swans are given a can of corn everyday, possibly twice a day. ... A few years ago when I was concerned about their diet, as I mostly see the Waterfowl at the Zoo get a soaked pellet type food, in addition to some greens, possibly some other veggies, I researched what exactly they should be eating, and corn was a staple mentioned.  The Ritz Crackers and Cereal I saw them being fed regularly by a Caretaker, were not.  I would assume that the salt content of crackers isn't the best thing, but I don't know that for sure.

I had not seen this woman before and asked her about the feeding schedule and additional diet she was getting, as I heard the Zoo had been giving both Blanche and Blue Boy an appropriate diet and that some food was sent "home" with Blanche.

The information the woman provided was concerning and raised unanswered questions.  Among the things she said were,...  She didn't know who, when or how often anyone was feeding her.  She was asked by someone (although she didnt know who, and was not in contact with them) if she could come on Saturdays to feed Blanche corn. She was under the impression that a some feeders need a break, and possibly longer as two were going on maternity leave.  She said they were still feeding her Ritz Crackers.  

I don't know what the recommended amount of Corn is, but I think both Swans were given one can to share, once or twice a day. While I stood there, Blanche ate almost the equivalent of three cans, out of a juice bottle.  She seemed ravenous.  I have to wonder when the last time she ate was?

Blanche eating her corn.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6DGExqz-yn0

After she finished all the corn there was, she moved along down the edge of the Lagoon towards people feeding the Ducks.  A girl came up and started feeding her a Cupcake.  I asked her not to, noting that she had a special diet.  Then a Family carrying six loaves of bread showed up.  I educated them about feeding bread, and also told them not to feed her that.  Blanche was still trolling for food, and I felt bad.  While in the moment, I felt it was the right thing to do, for her health, but I ended up feeling guilty, like I prevented her from a meal, when she was obviously hungry.  The whole situation was very upsetting.  And, I should not be feeling bad, because I'm not the one who is denying her what she needs at this point in her life. That's on the Caretaker Gayle, as she is responsible for Blanche's well-being, and the Rec and Park who should be monitoring the Caretaker.

Short clip of Beautiful Blanche on the Lagoon, going looking for a handout, because she's still hungry.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gPpiV36b0_g

I will keep repeating this, because I think its a valid thought, and again disturbing that returning her was the decision made.  It does not seem like it was in her best interest.  At her age, previous health issue, and vulnerable environment (both human interactions and possible toxins), she should still be at the Zoo, living in a controlled environment, monitored by Animal Care Professionals, and fed a proper diet.  I have no idea if a conversation ever took place between the Zoo, Rec and Park and the Caretaker Gayle, about a permanent retirement home at the Zoo, but I strongly feel like it should have.  I'm completely disturbed that Blanche is back on the Lagoon, and alone.  At the very least, once she got clean bill of health, they could have tried to put her at the Puente and seen how she adjusted.  It would have also given extra time for her to be monitored.

In my previous post I noted that my opinion about Blanche not returning to the Palace might not be popular with locals.  I don't know what the overall feeling is, but one of the neighborhood visitors said I was not alone in how I felt and that others that frequent the Palace were also upset that she was returned during the storm, and also worried about her being there in general.

I will continue to seek answers, as the situation seems unstable. While I did find out that the Gardeners have been feeding her, I want to find out how often.  I want to know if there is a schedule of reliable people committed to feeding and checking on her morning and evening everyday.   I want to know if anyone is following the Zoo's diet recommendations. From the information I have so far, no one seems to really know the complete management program and/or where Caretaker Gayle fits into that.  Is she even regularly involved?

I still believe that everyday that Blanche is out there alone, and unmonitored, is detrimental to her well-being.

I'm just very sad for this Precious Lady.  Please keep her in your thoughts.

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Blogger's Statement

"Personal Opinions and Facts presented publicly are Not against the law or any rules. ... Censorship and Retaliation Actions in an attempt at Suppression are frowned upon by Healthy Societies."

For Full Statement see this post:

https://iamnotananteater.blogspot.com/2018/09/my-zoo-status.html

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*