Birmingham Zoo Orangutan's SFZoo History

Well, maybe my mental ambition for posts this weekend was more than what I'll end up doing.  On the "resignation" post on Tuesday, I wrote there would be "Unpacking" posts to follow.  Don't worry, there are many docs started and many notes to organize.  Just not sure even one of those will be ready by days end today.

Last week started with me making notes for two posts not related to the Director situation.  They then got back-burnered, as the Director's resignation came to the front.  I'm bringing one to the top of the list now, as I had it pretty much written, and it flows with my last post about our incoming new Gorilla.  

Before I continue, I want to note something I discovered, while researching Cecil, our new Silverback.  I had forgot to share it in my previous post about his acquisition.  Our Bawang, is Cecil's Auntie!  I love learning about familial connections, especially between new acquisitions and existing residents.  Cecil's mama Muke is Bawang's sister.  Curiously, Bawang was moved to SF, the year after her birth in 1980.  Muke was born in '81 to the same Mama, so they most likely never met.  While Cecil's arrival will not be a reunion, since he and Bawang never knew each other, for me, there's a warm feeling knowing they will be living together. 

Monday morning my Mother shared a video to me on messenger of the Johnny Carson Show from the 80s. .... I remember as a kid watching the episodes that had Joan Embory from the San Diego Zoo as a guest.  Without any plan or ambition of a future career, each time I would say, "I want her job".

While the most present memory when I've thought of those appearances, is the Marmoset peeing on Carson's head, the video she shared was of babie Orangutans.  This clip was familiar as I have seen it at least once over the years, the last time must have been so long ago that the name of one of those babies didn't resonate with me.  This time it did.  Oliver, was he one of the Orangutans that was a part of Our Zoo's history?

Those who know my Zoo history, know I have been coming to the Zoo since I was a babie, sixty-one years.  It wasn't until 2008 that a devastating loss had me seeking solace in Our Zoo Animals.  It was then that I started learning about them as individuals.  Research has always been an interest, so learning all I could about these Friends, and the Animals I grew-up visiting, thankfully filled many sad hours.  After exhausting every news article archived online, I developed an interest in the genealogy of Our Animals.  My introduction to Studbooks came when a Keeper shared the Lion and Tiger ones she had with me.  Learning about Our Lions was of initial interest, as I had spent a good amount of time with the three who arrived at Our Zoo from a breeding facility in South Africa as Cubs in 1997.  I learned Our Lion Ladies Amanzi and Sukari were Sisters, and that Our Tiger Ladies Padang and Skylar were Auntie and Niece respectively.  This cool discovery was something Keepers didn't even know.

I wanted to share all I was learning about Our Zoo Friends, mostly to help endear others to Our Zoo, like I was, especially after the Tiger event in 2007.  So, in 2009 I started my first blog ever, "goober's sfzoo friends", like this one, it is also named for my sweet Tapir friend Goober.  That blog holds a special place, as it is pure goodness.  It was before I unintentionally got caught up in Zoo bullshit.

Years ago, I searched online news for the Orangutans who used to live at Our Zoo decades ago.  I knew of four, Lipz, Rusty, Oliver and Thelma.  It was near fifteen years ago, that I found Lipz at Birmingham Zoo.  She was in the news after giving birth to her daughter Nairi.  Nairi's father, is a fella named Oliver.

I learned this Oliver was the same who I had heard many stories about from a friend who was the Ape Keeper from the 60s - 80s.  John Alcaraz was our Senior Chimpanzees first Keeper.  He worked with many Animal species, primarily Apes, and he LOVED his Orangutans.  John developed the Trees Project, which allowed the young Orangutans to play in the trees in the back of the Zoo near the Gorilla enclosure.  Here he is reading with a young Oliver.

So, was this Oliver, the Oliver from the Carson show clip?  After watching it, I pulled up the Orangutan Studbook.  Yes, this was babie Oliver!  While seeing Apes in this way may not be comfortable in today's consciousness, this was a different time, and Oliver is beyond adorable.  I consider this an absolute priceless discovery, and a precious gift.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=I8Jl4M-9rbc&pp=0gcJCfwAo7VqN5tD

While both Oliver and Lipz were SFZoo Residents, their time here didn't overlap.  They never met in SF, but they found love in Birmingham and with their daughter Nairi, all three still reside there together.  Oliver turned 45 in June, Lipz celebrated 43 in May.

Oliver and Nairi

Lipz (next to Nairi)

After seeing the video of Oliver and making the connection, I thought while we all wait for Tanya's exit, I'd build a post around it and share.  Hopefully you've enjoyed this.  Also hoping there will be a time where all I do is write about the Animals, and other good things the future, if done right, will bring Our Zoo.

Related Links ... My warm and fuzzy Zoo blogs!

My first blog, exclusively about the Animals.

*goober's sfzoo friends

https://gooberssfzoofriends.blogspot.com/2009/06/welcome.html

My Enrichment blog - I made Toys for the Friends

*the big cat nip

https://thebigcatnip.blogspot.com/2010/08/welcome.html

Our Beloved Animal Amanzi with Lion sized Firecracker and Ice Cream Cone, circa 2010.

New Beginnings For Our Zoo & Our Gorilla Family

This past Tuesday not only brought news of the current Director's resignation, but it also brought news of the acquisition of a new Gorilla.  Tanya Peterson's internal goodbye letter to Staff was shared to me, and tucked in between all her usual fluffy bullshit, was the sweet morsel that a new Silverback would be arriving soon.

When I first hear about new Zoo Friends, I want to learn more about them, especially their name.  When I visited the Zoo Wednesday, I inquired, but learned it was all on the hush, until his home Zoo announced it.  Thankfully my curiosity was fed yesterday, when news out of Kentucky, was the Louisville Zoo's male Cecil was "heading West".

His arrival will be an exciting time everyone, especially Our Ladies, Bawang, Monifa, and Kimani.  Visiting Gorillas has had a sadness in the air since the loss of their Silverback Oscar Jonesy in February.  Jonesy was always upfront keeping an eye on the peoples, with his absence, the Ladies are often scarce or seemingly and understandably, still mourning.  The arrival of Cecil is sure to bring back some life to Our Troop.  

I found this photo from last fall, and chose to use it here, as media have all used the same photos, and I also love Zoo Friends with Pumpkins.  The link below it is to Louisville's video announcement, which I thought was pretty good, and shows Our Ladies as well.

https://www.facebook.com/Louisvillezoo/videos/748439790981611/

The news reports have mentioned future breeding recommendations. Both Kimani and Monifa had prior recommendations.  It is my hope that Kimani will be Cecil's first choice.  Don't get me wrong, I love Miss Mo (as I call her), but in addition to her not loving motherhood the first time around, I have felt bad for Kimani since her arrival six years ago.  The other Ladies never seemed to accept her, and she always seems to be an outcast.  I'd like to see her come into her own in this troop.

One of the things I am very happy about with this acquisition, is apparently Cecil will be retaining his name!  I immediately smiled, and even now as I write this, it's bringing tears.  The Animals identity being respected, not only means something to me, it means something period.

For those who know me, or have followed this blog, the name changing at Our Zoo has been a real issue for me.  My first experience with it was back in 2010 when Hippo Tucker arrived.  His name, like so many others that followed, in what became an epidemic, was stripped from him, and changed, not once, but twice.  Thankfully, when he left he got his identity back in Cincinnati.  

I understand the reason behind some name changes, but reasons are not always good or acceptable.  There have been changes with money attached, and flippant changes with no money or care, made by Director Peterson.  Initially, most of the changes I experienced were donor related.  Again, while I understand the reason, I think there are other ways to raise funds.  Unfortunately, Director Peterson never sought many other ways, or in the case of new acquisitions, never presented alternatives, like donor plaques.  The go to was selling off identities, which is both uncreative and disrespectful.  Often accepting inappropriate names for the check on top of it.  Unless the Animal is a newborn with no name, it's just not right.  

Coincidentally, on my way to the Zoo Wednesday morning, a thought came to mind.  It surprised me that during this recent time, when the chance of change in Director was possible, I had not thought of this.  It surprised me, because it's been a fantasy of mine for many, many years.  With Tanya Peterson on her way out, could Our Zoo Friends get back their Original Names?  

In 2019, the arrival of four new Chimpanzees and two Orangutans, brought a really disgusting component to name changing.  I'm pretty sure all but one had money attached to it.  The first Chimpanzee who arrived had his name sold.  Qadeer, which actually has a meaning, was changed to Gombus, which isn't even a word.  Searches at the time only brought up food, asking if I meant Gumbo.  The three who followed, Jamie, Twiggy, and Nick, became Beth, Connie and Michael. Allegedly renamed by Director Peterson to honor Society Members, no money attached, only the lack of Care and Respect.  There is no honor in changing the name of any Animal, especially a Great Ape.  Orangutans Ollie and Amoi, also got new names, Berani and Judy.  I think the name Judy is on the wall in the Chimpanzee Dayroom, so probably another disrespect with no money specifically attached.  Where tje name Berani, came from I can't remember.  

Of course I'd like to see every Zoo Friend who's name was not sold, regain their identity.  While completely doable, that probably won't happen.  That said, at the very least Our Great Ape Friends, Twiggy, Nick, Amoi, and hopefully Ollie, can once again publicly be known by their original names.  It would be admirable if the Zoo reached out to Qadeer's donor, and explained (my fantasy), with new management an effort is being made to reclaim Animals original names, and offer a plaque instead.  Sadly, Jamie passed away carrying a name that was not hers.

Hopefully, Our Great Apes future, sees them reclaiming their original identities, and that moving forward, future acquisitions like Cecil, will be allowed to keep their names.

Our Zoo - Gaining Independence

The timing for current Zoo Director Tanya Peterson's Resignation, could only have been better had it happened years ago.  Preferably before she kept Our Orangutans living in caged tubes for two years.

The news of Peterson's not soon enough departure next month, coinciding with Independence Day, is fitting.

Our Zoo has been saddled with her mass mismanagement for seventeen years.  It has seen extreme abuse of power.  Tanya ran rampant through Our Zoo.  There is so much that could be noted, but in my opinion, the worst has been her treatment of all Living Beings.  She refused to listen to experienced advice from Animal Care Staff, causing a wide range of welfare issues to Our Animal Residents.  She terrorized and threatened Staff, creating low morale, and forcing longtime dedicated Animal Care Staff to leave.  

As I said, there is so much more.  The saddest part of watching what has happened every step of the way, is that none of it had to happen. There didn't need to be this contention.  Unfortunately, that is what happens when someone asserts their self-entitlement.

Tanya Peterson, already a Society Member, was put in place interim.  She had no on the grounds experience, zoo knowledge or profession education.  Yet she launched and ran her reign like she knew what was best for Our Zoo, sadly and shamefully, she did that also with the lack of care.  

Coming into position, Peterson had the good fortune of a dedicated Animal Care Staff that included longtime individuals, some who had been there decades.  Some who even started as teenage volunteers, who planned to dedicate their professional lives to the Zoo they grew-up loving.  She ruined their experience to the point they left.  The list of good, caring people that she ran-out is long.  I talk about the Animal Care Staff the most because I know and have known them the most, because of my care and endearment to Our Animals.  

Our Zoo is foremost, an Animal Care Facility.  I've said it repeatedly.  That was lost on Tanya Peterson.  That is the most critical component in every one of her fails, that the Animals are the Soul of Our Zoo.  

Moving forward, I hope the Members of the Zoological Society Board who backed Peterson blindly, and were negligent in their attention to her management and the Zoo in general, will take a different approach.  I hope they will choose a new Director that has knowledge about what it takes to manage an Animal Care Facility.  

I have previously expressed my opinion about making that choice.  Our Zoo has alot of healing and repair in it's future.  I think having someone who has been here and experienced not only the fails during the Peterson years, but who was here before and had great optimism for the future of Our Zoo.  Someone who already knows Our Zoo, and most important, Cares about Our Zoo.  I hope the Society looks internally first.  They should immediately be accepting applications from current longtime Staff.  

I hope to see a bright future for Our Zoo, and not a repeat of the last seventeen years.  A new Director who will build a knowledgeable management team, allowing Our Zoo to thrive.  

July 4, 2029, Our Zoo's 100th Anniversary.  That Independence Day should see Our Zoo shining it's brightest! 

Related Post:

*Ding Dong ... She's (Almost) Gone!

https://iamnotananteater.blogspot.com/2025/07/ding-dong-shes-almost-gone.html

Ding! Dong! ... She's (Almost) Gone!

For those who haven't heard the News, Tanya Peterson is on her way OUT as Director of Our San Francisco Zoo.  

The moment we've all been waiting for, has finally come.  

Let the healing (and celebrating) soon begin.  

I got the News about 5:30p, about a half hour after it breaking in media.  Thank you to those who texted me!  I had gotten home an hour before and checked Google news and nothing.  Proceeded to wrap-up my day and then Pow with the Wow!  I hadn't expected there would be any developments on this revealed until later in the week.

There is so much to unpack now that we're finally here.  So, this post will be short, but I'm sure I'll have many over a handful of days through the weekend.  The wheels have already been turning for the last four hours, so I'm going to sift through my notes so I keep this simple, and leave further dissection for the coming days.

I think I'm not the only one who is curious about what transpired to make this finally happen.  It was heavily reported that Tanya, "has no intention of leaving".  So, one must assume this was not her idea.  And, while the Mayor denied having Authority,  when he finally got involved, it happened quick!   The most seemingly possible scenario is the Mayor pushed to remove her.   We know the Board, now made up of her supporters, didn't want to remove her.  Maybe the Mayor finally asserted himself, the Board had no choice, and they laid it on the line, giving her the opportunity to resign and save face.  All we know now and possibly forever, is that it's done.  

I'm still wondering, what moved the Mayor to get in the game? As I wrote in a previous post, I'm not saying my efforts pressuring the Mayor had anything to do with it, but it would seem my almost daily, consistent badgering via email and social media, had to have had some impact.  As well, before I started going hardcore on him, I had already been on the RecPark Commission and GM, ultimately urging them to ask the Mayor for help removing Peterson.  All I can see is he was silent, until I was vocal.  Whatever it was, we owe him Thanks, even if he made us wait too long.

Seven weeks ago, when the Zoo Board was voting over and over to fire Tanya, I had a thought that made me smile.  I wondered something I hadn't before.  I asked Google, Has any Director in the history of the San Francisco Zoo been fired?  The AI Overview response was, "While the San Francisco Zoo has had its share of leadership changes, there is no record of a Director being formally fired." 

It would have been perfect Karmic satisfaction for me if Tanya had been the first Director to ever be fired from Our Zoo, as I was the first person in the history of Our Zoo to have my Membership revoked, ... at her hands.  Ironically, because I cared about Our Zoo, something, contrary to what she is still trying to make people think, she never has.

It's ok though.  It's enough, even ironic that she has lost a job she wanted to stay in, whether by her own volition, or by ultimatum suggestion.  It's a beautiful thing, and still has the feeling that some Karma was at play, either for the way she treated me, or the many staffers she was shitty to.

Ironically, I woke-up this morning, and had a graphic in mind, as we all waited for the outcome of the Mayor's "talks with the Zoo Board".  I've become a bit compulsive with my AI graphics. I didn't have anything new to document about the Director situation, but of course the thoughts and feelings continued.  I feel like the graphics I've made interpret a condensed version of what I'm feeling and thinking.  Akin to the saying, "a picture is worth a thousand words".  My thoughts were, what if the Mayor's talks with the Board are not successful.  What if he continues to maintain that he has no Authority, and the Society Board doesn't budge.  

I planned to post the graphic and the paragraph above, but it was getting late and I needed to jam out the house.  Thought I might do it while out, tried but fast on the go as day was running late, and later when on the way home, I stopped to help a Canada Goose who was walking on the shoulder of a four lane freeway.  

Then the news.  

So, in closing for tonight, I'll share that graphic, as it was a future many of us had felt could be the reality for Our Zoo.

Now, hundreds of us are relieved and rejoice.  Now she knows she can't just do whatever she wants indefinitely, and contrary to what she believed, Tanya Peterson does not own Our Zoo.

 

Mayor Seemingly Maintains He Has No Authority Over Zoo Board

I just emailed the Mayor as planned since my first post this weekend.  I am making a post that includes it, in light of last evenings KPIX News report.  I saw it after publishing yesterday's post late last night.  I hadn't planned on reacting to it, as it really is more of the same from Lurie.  That said, it is important to document the updates, as well the Mayor continuing to maintain the position that he has no Authority over the Zoological Society, really bothers me.

How can it be possible that Managers (Director/Board) have Authority over Owners (City)???

This needs to be publicly explained.  Zoo Staff, Members, Visitors and Residents of The City deserve to understand this and Why Director Tanya Peterson is running the show.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=8vw0iNf6c7E&pp=0gcJCfwAo7VqN5tD

My email to Mayor Daniel Lurie this morning...

Why Do You Deny Your Authority Over Zoological Society?

Hello Mayor Lurie,

You're long-awaited entry into the saga that is, Removing Tanya Peterson as Director of Our Zoo, was Disappointing.

Once Park GM Phil Ginsburg, along with Larry Mazzola and the other Park Commissioners wimped out, it was up to you to assert your Authority, the top Authority, and you too have buckled.

KPIX News reported, "Only the Zoo Board has the Authority to Fire Peterson".  That had to have come from some official capacity.

That statement is seemingly untrue.  I read the Lease Agreement to confirm what has been well-known knowledge throughout staff and myself.  I had previously been told by former BOS President Aaron Peskin, as well as RecPark that the Authority, lies with the RecPark, under the Mayor, leaving you in that top position.  

Screencaps from the Lease Agreement supporting that, are included in my blog post from yesterday.

*He Said, She Said, And Other Authority Nonsense

iamnotananteater.blogspot.com/2025/06/he-said-she-said-and-other-authority.html

I will also include additional post links at the end, but they should not stop you from further exploration of my blog archives, as I think it would benefit you at the very least, to educate yourself on some key notations you made in your statement,...

“Under new leadership, it has an opportunity to be truly world-class and seize the exciting opportunity to energize our city and welcome visitors from around the world by bringing pandas to San Francisco,” he said. “I am confident that stable, permanent leadership will strengthen the zoo and our city’s ability to welcome pandas.” 

Leadership and Pandas.  I discuss both in many posts on my blog.  Bringing Pandas to Our Zoo at this time, meaning before taking care of the long list of Needs Our Current Zoo Animals and Our Zoo are Desperate for, is Irresponsible.  Continuing with the current management structure, only changing the Director, is of course the immediate welcome, it is not the only change that Our Zoo needs to thrive at optimum.  Now is the time to Fix all of the Fails that Tanya Peterson and the Society Board have allowed to plague Our Zoo for the last seventeen years.

If you continue to stand firm in your apparent position, that you do not have top Authority, it would make you seem stronger in character to publicly address,... 

Why you as the highest City Official, believe you do not have Authority over the Zoological Society, a Management entity, in regard to a City Owned Facility? 

Thank you

Kim...

> Regarding Pandas...

*The Moral Crime Of Bringing Pandas To Our Zoo

https://iamnotananteater.blogspot.com/2025/05/the-moral-crime-of-bringing-pandas-to.html

*What Will Happen If the Panda Plan Goes Through

https://iamnotananteater.blogspot.com/2025/05/what-will-happen-if-panda-plan-goes.html

> Regarding Leadership...

*A Crucial Moment In Time For The Future Of Our Zoo

https://iamnotananteater.blogspot.com/2025/05/a-crucial-moment-in-time-for-future-of.html

*The Change That's Needed To Save Our Zoo - Part Two - Restructuring Management

https://iamnotananteater.blogspot.com/2024/10/the-change-thats-needed-to-save-our-zoo_19.html

End of Email

Those who want to be a Voice in this Outrageous saga can email the Mayor at daniel.lurie@sfgov.org

 

He Said, She Said, And Other Authority Nonsense

In last night's post, I highlighted some of the statements from two news articles regarding the Mayor's surprising and long-awaited entry into the saga that is, Removing Tanya Peterson as Director of Our Zoo.

It was late so I just noted my immediate thoughts.  I woke-up this morning with more to add.  I also read the Lease Agreement, which was exhausting, so I watched a movie and took a nap.  Apologies for late posting once again.

I also had this graphic already made weeks ago, that I finally had some text to add to it.  I think I had a premonition there might be a showdown!  

It's curious there is even a question as to who said what.  Shouldn't calls to government offices be recorded?

While I would never trust anything Tanya said as truth in even the slightest way, would she be so careless as to completely change the dialog of a conversation with the Mayor?  I'm leaning towards Yes she would, but it would be pretty brazen.  But, that is the Peterson way.

That said, while I know nothing about Mayor Lurie's honesty, Why would he lie about what transpired?  What would the gain be?  

The outcome is the same as what could have happened if Tanya's side of the story is true.  That outcome is, Lurie has now reportedly requested the Zoological Society Board seek a replacement for Director Peterson.

In my opinion, if the Mayor continues to take the non-Authority role, Why would the Board even entertain his request?  The remaining Board Members have already rallied to support keeping Peterson in place.

It's also my opinion that a new Director may have a hard time with the Board as is, if they lose their favorite child.  I continue to maintain that the only road forward must see a complete management overhaul that includes not only Replacing the Director, but Restructuring Management to split into two components, Society Members and Animal Care Staff, with Members of the Animal Care Staff, also having a seat at the table.  The Society's bias and negligence, dictates change.  Also, the roles of the Society Board and the RecPark Dept, who has also been negligent in their oversight responsibility to Our Zoo, desperately need to be Redefined.

In my June 15th post, "Apparently It Seems No City Authority Will Take Action To Remove Zoo Director", I documented some efforts I made to further confirm what we all seemingly know to be accurate as to who has Authority over the Zoological Society Board.

I wrote...

>I then engaged with another source and during that exchange, it was revealed that there are questionable factors that have lead the Recreation and Park Department to believe that they do not have the Authority to Remove Tanya Peterson.< 

> I am continuing to investigate the validity of their disbelief.  Until I learn more, I'm choosing not to document further details. <

I responded to the above exchange, asking questions, that have gone unanswered.  Considering I've given it a reasonable amount of time, I will include that correspondence here.  I think it's important to document, questions to City sources that go unanswered, especially ones that are trying to clarify something this important.

Original inquiry...

"Considering yesterday's news regarding the supervisors moving forward with plan to withhold the zoo's funding, we are all wondering why Phil Ginsburg has not asserted his authority to remove Tanya."

"Are we all and all including many staffers who have worked there for over 20 years, wrong in who has authority over the Zoological Society? Because everyone has thought it is the Mayor and RecPark."

"And last year I confirmed that with Supervisor Peskin. ... Is that not still accurate?"

Response...

"It is a very unusual case. In our lease and management agreement with the Zoo, it is plainly written that way. However, it refers back to a portion of the City Charter that was since repealed (in 1996). I don’t necessarily think it was specifically repealed because of the zoo – it probably covered a number of different topics and this was an inadvertent result."

"As such, for example, I don’t have any records of the Commission hiring the current Zoo director. So, as we understand, the SFZS has ultimate authority over the decision to hire the director."

My first reply...

"Thanks for that information. But considering the Zoo is City owned regardless of who put her in position shouldn't the RecPark and or the Mayor still have the ultimate authority?  I mean seriously considering what is going on a Management entity should not have the ultimate authority."

"And maybe the RecPark is hands tied but the Mayor isn't right?"

"Do you have a copy of that City charter or can send me the portion that would apply? Otherwise what is in the lease agreement should stand?"

My added reply...

"I just have some questions in addition to the ones that I asked you in the last email."

"So is there a loophole being looked into?"

"So I'm assuming that every other director was approved by the commission? Why was Tanya not?" 

"And assuming that the Mayor has ultimate authority can't the Commission or Phil, whoever's in position, ask them for the Mayor's help in removing Tanya?" 

This exchange happened at the end of a business day before weekend. The reply I received was an auto out of office response for the duration of a full week.  

My last reply...

"I found a copy of that City Charter online.  Within the four Zoo references, I didn't see, or maybe understand?  How it relates to current issue?"

"If issue thought to be, whoever hired Tanya, has to fire her, and if RecPark should have, or had previously approved the hire of Directors, wouldn't that be a loophole?  Tanya was only interim, so maybe RecPark didn't approve, and then that approval fell through cracks when she stayed indefinitely?"

"After the Tiger event in 2007, wasn't RecPark who called for then Director Manuel Mollinedo's resignation?"

"Regardless of any of this, the Mayor should be the Authority to Remove her from a City Owned Facility.  A Management entity can not possibly have the final say over a "business" they do not own."

End of Correspondence

Again, I read the Charter available online and found no references to Authority.

In light of the Mayor's deflection of Authority, I screen-capped the related entries from the Lease Agreement.  Unless I am not interpreting the wording accurately, the Agreement seems to clearly state, that the Recreation and Park Department, and Mayor, have Authority over the Zoological Society Board.

Note mentions of "City" refers to San Francisco, "SFZS" refers to the SF Zoological Society, "General Manager" refer to the GM of the SF Recreation and Park Dept, and "Commission" refers to the SF Recreation and Park Commission.

The fact remains, the Zoological Society, and Tanya Peterson as it's Director, are Management Entities.  The Zoo is City Owned.  Owners have Authority over Managers.  It's seemingly that simple.

~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Blogger's Statement

"Personal Opinions and Facts presented publicly are Not against the law or any rules. ... Censorship and Retaliation Actions in an attempt at Suppression are frowned upon by Healthy Societies."

For Full Statement see this post:

https://iamnotananteater.blogspot.com/2018/09/my-zoo-status.html

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

I used to use (search) labels, but too often forget.  I started noting "Hot Topic" in title, but fell lax on that.  Now I'm just going to add labels, keywords, etc., here at the bottom with hashtags.  Does it help in searches, who knows.

#SanFrancisco , #SanFranciscoZoo , #Zoos #SanFranciscoZoologicalSociety , #SanFranciscoZooDirectorTanyaPeterson , #SanFranciscoRecreationAndParksDept , #SanFranciscoMayorLondonBreed ,
#SanFranciscoMayorDanielLurie
#AssociationOfZoosAndAquariums , #AZA , #SpeciesSurvivalPlan , #SSP , #Animals , #Wildlife , #Nature , #AnimalWelfare , #AnimalCruelty , #AndeanBear , #KomodoDragon , #Chimpanzees ,  #PatasMonkey , #Fossa , #Orangutans , #Barriers , #PerimeterFence, #Pandas #Bison

News Alert! SF Mayor Speaks! Says Zoo Director Is Resigning!?

In my previous post, published this morning at 10:30a, I continued to express my disappointment in the silence of The City's Mayor, Daniel Lurie.  I've been going at him hardcore on blog posts, which I've sent him, and on Social Media. Additionally, doing the same to RecPark, urging them to ask the Mayor to assert Authority.  Hopefully it helped make a difference.

Coincidentally, a half hour ago,  twelve hours after publishing, I finally got around to sharing my post to friends.  As I was getting ready to close-up and watch a movie, my email Google News Alert for "san francisco zoo" came through.  Apparently, if I had searched News myself I would have seen the two articles on the results earlier today.  I've recently abandoned that habit.  Funny timing, considering the juicy bits of this development. 

So the Mayor is FINALLY getting in the game.  

First, the SF Chronicle's offering...

https://www.sfchronicle.com/sf/article/san-francisco-zoo-peterson-20398098.php

Highlight Quotes...

> Lurie told his advisers and one San Francisco supervisor that Peterson had said to him that she planned to resign as CEO and executive director of the San Francisco Zoological Society, which runs the city-owned zoo. On Friday evening, Lurie’s office issued a statement to the Chronicle welcoming the expected change in leadership. ... But on Friday night, Peterson’s spokesperson said she had no intention of leaving. <

> According to a source close to Lurie, Peterson told the mayor in their phone call that she would send in her resignation, supposedly to the Zoological Society, that day and would move on. The mayor then told Peterson he appreciated her service to the city. He also offered her an in-person meeting, but she said that wasn’t necessary because she would resign, according to the source. <

Aside from this He Said, She Said, in which Tanya Peterson once again, created a narrative to support the illusion she wanted to sell, which was seemingly to make the Mayor's head-spin, the other take-away unfortunately, is that the Mayor is supporting Pandas.  So, another person who has no idea about what bringing in Pandas at this time (before fixing Our Zoo), will do to Our Zoo, has stars in his eyes about this. ... I guess first things first.

The SF Standard's offering...

https://sfstandard.com/2025/06/28/sf-zoo-lurie-tanya-peterson/

> Lurie released a statement Friday night urging the zoo board to “develop a plan to name a new CEO,” <

Mayor Lurie also is seemingly fine with allowing the Zoological Society continue to run the show. Another action made wearing blinders.   The whole of management needs to be Restructured and the Society's role needs to be Redefined.  Removing the Puppet and keeping the Puppeteers, in my opinion, will not fix the main issues.

> The zoo is under the city’s Recreation and Parks Department but operates independently with its own governing board. While the mayor has no direct authority over the CEO’s employment, his involvement adds political pressure to the situation. <

Ugh, so apparently the Mayor is also declining to be an Authority in the situation.  Apparently either Deferring, or Relinquishing? the Authority to the Zoological Society, a Management entity of a City Owned Facility.  A real head-shaker, and unreal position to take as The City's Top Official.

So, I guess it's, Let The Games Begin!  

~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~

Blogger's Statement

"Personal Opinions and Facts presented publicly are Not against the law or any rules. ... Censorship and Retaliation Actions in an attempt at Suppression are frowned upon by Healthy Societies."

For Full Statement see this post:

https://iamnotananteater.blogspot.com/2018/09/my-zoo-status.html

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

I used to use (search) labels, but too often forget.  I started noting "Hot Topic" in title, but fell lax on that.  Now I'm just going to add labels, keywords, etc., here at the bottom with hashtags.  Does it help in searches, who knows.

#SanFrancisco , #SanFranciscoZoo , #Zoos #SanFranciscoZoologicalSociety , #SanFranciscoZooDirectorTanyaPeterson , #SanFranciscoRecreationAndParksDept , #SanFranciscoMayorLondonBreed ,
#SanFranciscoMayorDanielLurie
#AssociationOfZoosAndAquariums , #AZA , #SpeciesSurvivalPlan , #SSP , #Animals , #Wildlife , #Nature , #AnimalWelfare , #AnimalCruelty , #AndeanBear , #KomodoDragon , #Chimpanzees ,  #PatasMonkey , #Fossa , #Orangutans , #Barriers , #PerimeterFence, #Pandas #Bison