Showing posts with label San Francisco Palace of Fine Arts Swans. Show all posts
Showing posts with label San Francisco Palace of Fine Arts Swans. Show all posts

Sunday, March 21, 2021

Palace Of Fine Arts Swan Update - Is Blanche Being Fed and Checked on Daily?

I visited Blanche yesterday afternoon.  It was very upsetting, and now there are so many questions.

Last week when I heard she was returned to the Palace of Fine Arts I was shocked and sad for her.  In my opinion, doing so was Irresponsible and Cruel.   

Here is the link, for those who need to catch up on her situation.

https://iamnotananteater.blogspot.com/2021/03/palace-of-fine-arts-swans-update-male.html

I was already in for the week when I heard this news, so I planned to check on her first thing Monday morning.  I didn't get there Monday or Tuesday, and was disappointed in myself.  So, yesterday was my next day out again. ... I'm a believer that everything happens the way it's supposed to, and the Universe confirms that every time it positions me where I need to be, and at the time I need to be there.

When I got to the Palace, unfortunately it was packed, and too many people with no mask.  I maneuvered that health assault obstacle course over to Blanche, who was at the edge of the Lagoon, with a woman who was feeding her, her daily corn.  

From visiting regularly for many years, I know the Swans are given a can of corn everyday, possibly twice a day. ... A few years ago when I was concerned about their diet, as I mostly see the Waterfowl at the Zoo get a soaked pellet type food, in addition to some greens, possibly some other veggies, I researched what exactly they should be eating, and corn was a staple mentioned.  The Ritz Crackers and Cereal I saw them being fed regularly by a Caretaker, were not.  I would assume that the salt content of crackers isn't the best thing, but I don't know that for sure.

I had not seen this woman before and asked her about the feeding schedule and additional diet she was getting, as I heard the Zoo had been giving both Blanche and Blue Boy an appropriate diet and that some food was sent "home" with Blanche.

The information the woman provided was concerning and raised unanswered questions.  Among the things she said were,...  She didn't know who, when or how often anyone was feeding her.  She was asked by someone (although she didnt know who, and was not in contact with them) if she could come on Saturdays to feed Blanche corn. She was under the impression that a some feeders need a break, and possibly longer as two were going on maternity leave.  She said they were still feeding her Ritz Crackers.  

I don't know what the recommended amount of Corn is, but I think both Swans were given one can to share, once or twice a day. While I stood there, Blanche ate almost the equivalent of three cans, out of a juice bottle.  She seemed ravenous.  I have to wonder when the last time she ate was?

Blanche eating her corn.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6DGExqz-yn0

After she finished all the corn there was, she moved along down the edge of the Lagoon towards people feeding the Ducks.  A girl came up and started feeding her a Cupcake.  I asked her not to, noting that she had a special diet.  Then a Family carrying six loaves of bread showed up.  I educated them about feeding bread, and also told them not to feed her that.  Blanche was still trolling for food, and I felt bad.  While in the moment, I felt it was the right thing to do, for her health, but I ended up feeling guilty, like I prevented her from a meal, when she was obviously hungry.  The whole situation was very upsetting.  And, I should not be feeling bad, because I'm not the one who is denying her what she needs at this point in her life. That's on the Caretaker Gayle, as she is responsible for Blanche's well-being, and the Rec and Park who should be monitoring the Caretaker.

Short clip of Beautiful Blanche on the Lagoon, going looking for a handout, because she's still hungry.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gPpiV36b0_g

I will keep repeating this, because I think its a valid thought, and again disturbing that returning her was the decision made.  It does not seem like it was in her best interest.  At her age, previous health issue, and vulnerable environment (both human interactions and possible toxins), she should still be at the Zoo, living in a controlled environment, monitored by Animal Care Professionals, and fed a proper diet.  I have no idea if a conversation ever took place between the Zoo, Rec and Park and the Caretaker Gayle, about a permanent retirement home at the Zoo, but I strongly feel like it should have.  I'm completely disturbed that Blanche is back on the Lagoon, and alone.  At the very least, once she got clean bill of health, they could have tried to put her at the Puente and seen how she adjusted.  It would have also given extra time for her to be monitored.

In my previous post I noted that my opinion about Blanche not returning to the Palace might not be popular with locals.  I don't know what the overall feeling is, but one of the neighborhood visitors said I was not alone in how I felt and that others that frequent the Palace were also upset that she was returned during the storm, and also worried about her being there in general.

I will continue to seek answers, as the situation seems unstable. While I did find out that the Gardeners have been feeding her, I want to find out how often.  I want to know if there is a schedule of reliable people committed to feeding and checking on her morning and evening everyday.   I want to know if anyone is following the Zoo's diet recommendations. From the information I have so far, no one seems to really know the complete management program and/or where Caretaker Gayle fits into that.  Is she even regularly involved?

I still believe that everyday that Blanche is out there alone, and unmonitored, is detrimental to her well-being.

I'm just very sad for this Precious Lady.  Please keep her in your thoughts.

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Blogger's Statement

"Personal Opinions and Facts presented publicly are Not against the law or any rules. ... Censorship and Retaliation Actions in an attempt at Suppression are frowned upon by Healthy Societies."

For Full Statement see this post:

https://iamnotananteater.blogspot.com/2018/09/my-zoo-status.html

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Sunday, February 14, 2021

Palace Swans Relocated to Zoo - Should They Stay Permanently?

Tues 3.9.21 ... Look for my update to this story in the next couple days.

~*~*~*~*~*~

Wednesday evening this article came through my email news alert.  

https://www.sfgate.com/local/article/Palace-of-Fine-Arts-swans-Blanche-Blue-Boy-SF-15941089.php

I hadn't been to the Palace in at least a month, and had been meaning to go by and check on the Swans, the past couple weeks.  With Blanche's age (although I didn't think she was 25!), I worry about her.  So hearing this news is very upsetting.  

The article states that Blanche was the one who was possibly ill, but that same night there was also a Tweet by the Rec&Park, that both weren't well.  Both possibly being ill, is concerning, and makes me wonder if they weren't fed something bad by someone.  I've seen them in vulnerable situations too many times.

I have been visiting Blanche and Blue Boy for over ten years.  I have been lucky to experience some beautiful moments with them and their Cygnets.  In 2013 the priceless event of two babies hatching in front of me, is something I'll never forget. 

Here is a clip just after the first one hatched 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PinJBXIQajQ

And the second one, with its sibling, just minutes after hatching.  ...  Side bit, ...  I had seen Flamingos at the Zoo hatch but this was totally different.  The Flamingo Eggs pipped and it took some time (usually 2-48 hrs) for the Chick to peck its way out.  I never saw any pip holes on the Swan eggs when they were being turned.  Standing there, I heard a loud knock, knock, Blanche talked to egg, and literally the egg must have just split open, because there was the Chick!  Exactly two hours later, Blanche was talking to another egg, sat down, knock knock, and she stood up.  The egg had just cracked open, and the Chick was right there.  Incredible!

Screencap from my Flickr.  Haven't posted there in a long time, but I have some nice photos, lots of Zoo Friends, from when I used to have time to play around with them, edit, add borders, text, etc.
If anyone is interested  

Another favorite, but scary sighting, was in 2012, when the whole Family, including Six full grown Cygnets, came marching back from Marina Blvd, where they had decided to take the kids to the beach across the street.  Evidentially not the first or last time they have left the Palace Lagoon with their babies.  

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wlASd--vsCo

I feel it's necessary to illustrate some history, to support my wonder, whether the Swans should stay at the Zoo permanently. I apologize it may be long. I'm going to make as short as possible, and I know will still in no way cover it fully.

Between 2012-2017, anticipating the hatching and visiting the babies was a wonderful thing.  Until it wasn't.  The last few of those years, babies started going missing in curious ways.  The Caretakers exclusively blamed Animal Predators, yet I witnessed and continue to witness, bad behavior from the public the whole time I'm there, every visit.  So, I was suspicious of their tales.  I suspected the Caretakers were taking the babies soon after they were born.  When the whole group of babies went missing over night, in 2017, I knew this had to be true.  

By 2018, I dreaded the Swans breeding season.  From the attention to building their nest, to taking turns sitting on the eggs that contained their babies, and then watching them hatch, only to have them kidnapped within a couple days. It was heartbreaking, and I promised to help them keep their Family together.  

I was there the day after they hatched, which must have been after I had left the day before, because they were already in the water.  I listened to conversations one of the Caretakers had with one of the Gardeners, they were discussing getting "the net".   I was so upset, I can't even describe how frantic I felt, trying to figure out what to do to help them keep their Family together, as it seemed the kidnapping was about to happen.  

I made alot of calls on the spot, Media (they wanted story but didn't have a News truck available), Animal Care and Control (agreed this was wrong, sent someone out, but eventually deferred to Rec&Park), Rec&Park (sent a Ranger who too agreed this was wrong, but deferred to boss, who deferred to Caretakers) , and the guy who they take the babies to, who I had been in contact with a few years before.  His words were the most telling of the situation.  He said that he takes the babies because that's what they (the Caretakers) want.  He felt because he sold them Blanche and Blue Boy that he had to.  He keeps them on his farm, unless he can find a home for them.  Very nice guy who only wanted what is best for the Birds.  In his 80s, this was not a solution that was going to last forever.  I sent an email to an influential source explaining all this.  My source tried to mediate my position with the Rec&Park, and the Caretakers.  Unfortunately, after dozens of phone and email conversations (with all, including other City Officials), and illustrating of how wrong this was, evil prevailed and the kidnapping of these babies from their Parents happened before they were two days old. 

Now you might ask Why? are the babies being taken from Parents.  I was told by one of the Caretakers, it was to save their lives, as the Raccoons would take them.  I am not an unreasonable person, and in no way do I want to see or know that any of these babies lost their lives, this way, but this was wrong.  To me, this was akin to taking a human babie from its Mother because something "might" happen to it in their care.  In my opinion, this is twisted logic, based on a hypothetical.

After this horror, and seeing Blanche and Blue Boy, visibly showing behavior equal to our depression, I further expressed my opinion to my source and the Rec&Park, as it was the Rec&Park who allowed this to happen.  This has to stop.  They continued to defer to the Caretakers "expertise", which is questionable in my opinion.

I had talked to someone I know who has worked with Birds for over Twenty-Five years.  He agreed that there needed to be Breeding Management.  He even suggested that maybe the Zoo should take over their care much like the Bison.  In my post kidnapping correspondence, I noted this, suggesting that they use dummy eggs in the proper way (as one previous attempt had Blanche just lay more eggs that hatched), to prevent them from breeding any further.  Additionally, I suggested a better diet plan after repeatedly seeing one Caretaker feeding them Crackers and Cereal, as well noticing that the plants that border the lagoon are not edible for them.  I suggested Waterfowl food, and a small area be designated for plants they can eat.  Neither have happened.  Aside from the algae and water weeds, it seems the only food supplement they get is a can of corn, some lettuce, and the cereal and crackers.  I did see one of the Caretakers flail some grapes in that repeatedly hit Blanche and she had purple stains all over for days.

I held my breath every time I went to check on them during the 2019 breeding season.  Blanche was on the nest, Blue Boy was guarding from the water.  One day, there were six new babies in the water.  One of the Caretakers arrived and was standing near me.  I had never met her before, but had seen her behaving badly during the hatching of 2013.  She approached me to ask if I was the one with the YouTube video (I had made about the kidnapping the year before).  I said, Yes.  She proceeded to tell me her position. I told her mine.  I told her that she had bad breeding management, and that taking the babies was awful.  I noted that I didn't want to see harm come to them, but that taking them from their Parents on a hypothetical is cruel.  We talked about switching out the eggs, as she had done it unsuccessfully before.  I told her she needed to do better then.  I offered people I knew who could help, she declined.  Then she asked me if I could help her be a Caretaker since her partner was diminished with dementia. I declined and said, I would help, for them, but not if this practice of kidnapping is going to continue.  She asked me to help catch the babies right then so she could pinion them.  I had never done that before and declined.  I stayed and watched, but ultimately learned nothing about what plans were in store for these babies. 

I don't know what transpired, but these six Cygnets were allowed to stay with their Parents.  A group of neighborhood regulars and myself, texted updates almost daily.  The six grew to a decent size, before two were taken by Human Predator.  I flyered the surrounding area in hopes someone caught it on a security camera but heard nothing, and the Police did nothing.  The four continued to grow, but sometime later, after two more went missing, presumed by a Coyote spotted in area that morning, the remaining two were removed.   

I think they ended up staying with the Parents for near three months, which was a good run, and after four went missing, removing them at that time was the right call.  It was very sad that the numbers dwindled, but not unlike other wild waterfowl.  I feel awful that they lost four of the six, and there is always a it of a thought struggle of, what if they had been removed from start?  I still believe, that the Parents deserve the right at a chance to raise the babies they put their souls into creating.  They may be considered captive because their wings are clipped and they can't leave the area, but they live as wild Birds and should be allowed to keep their babies until the natural time when they would all go their own way.  In this case, their own way, is being removed from the lagoon.  Again, losing the four was sad, but having Humans forcibly remove their babies just after hatching, in my opinion is far more traumatizing.

Thankfully, there was success last year in egg management, and there were no Cygnets hatched.  It was sad, but for the best, even though my heart broke for Blanche and Blue Boy to go through nest building and incubating and having nothing at the end.  At least their babies weren't taken from them.

Hopefully, this hasn't been too long of a read, because all information is necessary relating to my title question, Should the Swans stay at the Zoo permanently?  

Personally I think if appropriate space can be found for them, Yes!  Blanche deserves a retirement home, with consistent medical care, and good diet, and that home should include Blue Boy.   I was happy to read he was removed as well and brought to be with her.  As usual there is something I don't understand.  Why did it take twelve days?

The Rec&Park Tweeted this ... Hoping for regular updates.

I have watched these two and they are a bonded pair.  It's documented that Mute Swans mate for life.  I was shocked when in that 2018 conversation with the Caretaker, she told me she was thinking of removing Blue Boy!  We had been discussing breeding management and I asked her why she would ever have brought a male in, instead of just having females?  She didn't answer, but yet blurted her idea to remove him.  I was like, ahhh, No, you can't separate them.  You would have to remove them together and then bring in females.  She told me that Blanche didn't like Blue Boy.  This woman's credibility went from low to zero with that statement.  People, do they look like they don't like eachother?

So, with Blanche's age, the breeding management situation, and the dietary concern, as well as lack of regular medical care and the daily crap they put up with from humans, I think finding them a home in the Zoo would be in their best interest.  

Having Swans at the Palace is beautiful and idyllic, but unnecessary considering many factors and in recent years by the Caretakers own admittance, something that has been increasingly hard to handle on her own.

Thinking of unused areas (they can not be housed with any other Birds) with water sources, ideas popped in this order, ... the sea lion pool, the old Pygmy Hippo area, and then the pond in the Children's Zoo.  In my opinion,  the last being the best option as it is not surrounded by concrete.  

From Google Maps ... Orange is area. Blue is pond. Green is adjacent land area. ... A few of area I took recently.


It is a bit shallower than ideal, but I think might meet the 2-3 ft minimum depth requirements that I've read about.  It would need a few renovations, a border fence to contain them, and a night barn to protect them from Predators.  Additionally, I heard there might have been an issue with the drain, but if that can be fixed, I think that area could work.  Maybe the Rec&Park and the Caretaker could help with the costs of renovation. 

It would be great to see this pond alive again.  The Zoo has too many unused areas that need to be filled, and what better way than with Animals in need. ... I've had a post about this in draft for over a year.  Maybe soon  Stay tuned.

I'm Praying for Blanche and for Blue Boy if indeed they are both not well.  Hoping they recover and retiring them to the Zoo is considered.

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Blogger's Statement

"Personal Opinions and Facts presented publicly are Not against the law or any rules. ... Censorship and Retaliation Actions in an attempt at Suppression are frowned upon by Healthy Societies."

For Full Statement see this post:

https://iamnotananteater.blogspot.com/2018/09/my-zoo-status.html

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*





Friday, May 25, 2018

HOT TOPIC! - SF Rec and Park Allowing Volunteers to Kidnap Swan Babies!

Well, I again got delayed in wrapping up the posts I have in draft and getting them posted.  

On Monday 5.14.18 , I went to the Palace of Fine Arts to check on a Duck I observed with a foot issue the week before.  Also the week before I saw both Swan Parents, Blanche and Blue Boy off the nest, so I figured with hatching time at either near or passed, that there would be no Cygnets this year, OR that the Caregivers had once again taken them.  To my surprise and joy, there were two beautiful Cygnets, with their Parents!


Knowing these Swans very well, even having two eggs hatch in front of me in 2013, I once again became involved in the cruel drama that they suffer at the hands of the Volunteer Caretakers and SF Rec and Park.  I knew for several years that the Caretakers were taking these Babies soon after hatching, but couldn't prove it and no one believed me.  Well, this same day, I overheard the Caretaker and Gardener hatching a plan to "Net" the Babies!   Needless to say, I was near tears, that this might not only be happening, but possibly be happening while I was there.  I was thrown into a heightened state of anxiety, literally shaking as I tried to google search contact numbers for media that I didn't already have in my phone.  I called everyone I could think of, spoke with ACC, Park Rangers, Rec and Park Staff who all deferred to one person, who is and continues to be no help, because she refuses to acknowledge the factual reason the Caretaker is giving.  

I want to note because it relates to the SFZoo.  Dealing with Rec and Park in regards to this situation, it has become clearer that they do not care about Animals.  I have contacted them in regard to Wildlife issues before and they are no help.  I have found that in this situation with the Palace Swans, they defer to the Volunteer Caretakers, rather than take an active role in the management of the Swans.  Sound familiar?  It should, because (and this is a blog post I intend to do) the SF Rec and Park, along with the SF Zoological Society is supposed to take part in managing the Zoo, yet they defer to Director Peterson, rather than take that active role in management.  Why?  I can only assume because its easier for them.  They don't have to think about the Zoo, or in this case the Swans.  Others are appointed to head the management, so they just take whatever they say, whether the Swan Caretakers, or Zoo Director, as word and allow them to do whatever they want.  

Passing the buck is common, but what I find disturbing and curious about the SF Rec and Park, is that, our City claims to be "green"  and care about the environment, patting its back at every turn on their "accomplishments" in this area, yet when it comes to the Wild things that live here, both actually wild and in captivity, they don't seem to give a shit.  Its really upsetting.

With all the networking I have been trying to do to Help the Swans, I keep forgetting to post here for added awareness. ... The Cygnets are two weeks old now.  Hopefully my efforts have given them a stay from the Kidnapping.  Who knows because you can't get a satisfying answer out of Rec and Park.  The Rec and Park give one reason, the Caretakers another.  The later says they take them so they don't get eaten by Raccoons.   Rec and Park refuses to comment on the contradiction.  Bottom line, these Babies need their Parents.  These Swans were put to live on the Palace Lake as Wild Animals.  They must be allowed to take care of their Babies until the natural time they would separate in the wild, which is near adult size , after 3-4 months.  Taking them preemptively on a hypothetical is Cruel, and just as traumatizing as if  they were taken by Animal Predator.                                                                                              

                                                                                                                                                             There are alot of details to this situation.  I started a dedicated blog to this situation.  I have a post detailing all information, a post to my FB Group, Petition, and Video.  If this interests you please visit the blog and read the details.  I will continue to post there about what's going on.  Thank you!

Help Spread Awareness!
View and Share